Andre dirrel...super six champion?

Calzaghe would whitewash Froch, bottom line.

so its his arrogance...because hes had two fight of the year contenders of 2008 and 2009 so you are already talking bs on that... Is it because he slates claslappe dubious cv??? you can nuthug him all you want,he will never sleep with you kid sorry 2 break it 2 ya

i dont hate him,just think he is horrible too watch and runs his mouth a lot for someone who isnt that good dont worry i get your obsession with him,he is from nottingham and so are you and its all your s*ithole of a city has,dont worry i understand so its his arrogance...because hes had two fight of the year contenders of 2008 and 2009 so you are already talking bs on that... Is it because he slates claslappe dubious cv???

he beat pacal world champ, taylor and dirrell...time for you to start being in camp froch...comon did he shag your mum or something??? spill the beans why you really hate him... i dont hate him,just think he is horrible too watch and runs his mouth a lot for someone who isnt that good dont worry i get your obsession with him,he is from nottingham and so are you and its all your s*ithole of a city has,dont worry i understand

froch just isnt that good mate you will understand one day na i dont want a girlfriend,i have enough fun with yours he beat pacal world champ, taylor and dirrell...time for you to start being in camp froch...comon did he shag your mum or something??? spill the beans why you really hate him...

allan green had froch winning, buncey had froch winning, showtime had froch winning, boxinbg scene had froch winning, ea5t5ide boxing forums had forch winning, the ring side press had froch winning...even gary shaw admitted it was no robbery and it wasa fair result... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo keep trying but you hate for froch is making you seeth to much..calm down and get a girlfriend... froch just isnt that good mate you will understand one day na i dont want a girlfriend,i have enough fun with yours

froch lost but got a lucky decision get over it kid allan green had froch winning, buncey had froch winning, showtime had froch winning, boxinbg scene had froch winning, ea5t5ide boxing forums had forch winning, the ring side press had froch winning...even gary shaw admitted it was no robbery and it wasa fair result... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo keep trying but you hate for froch is making you seeth to much..calm down and get a girlfriend...

round 10 dirrells only decent round he had a point deducted... nice try but the fights on youtube.....dont need a ugly no mark like you to try and convince me...plus i was actually there and had froch up by 6... as i say nice try but your flogging a dead horse if you think you can out debate me... Stick to watching these videos... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp7DrCtdTXQ froch lost but got a lucky decision get over it kid

lol i found it left hook and he wasnt hurt Dirrell actually hurt froch which had him back pedalling to the ropes in the 10th i believe round 10 dirrells only decent round he had a point deducted... nice try but the fights on youtube.....dont need a ugly no mark like you to try and convince me...plus i was actually there and had froch up by 6... as i say nice try but your flogging a dead horse if you think you can out debate me... Stick to watching these videos... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp7DrCtdTXQ

I don't think he can over come, because your post trying to make the case for such a thing, was written in capitals. But also, because he already has one loss against not the favourite 1/2 guys in the tourney. So he's likely to pick up another loss. That = not winning it.

Froch wasnt landing shit, and get that picture out of your sig it was Frochs biggest punch landed and was more of a push than a punch, a green prospect made your God look like shit wrong...froch best punch was in round 8 that sent dirrell all puch drunk..the fact that dirrells face looked like it was in a car crash with a bloodied nose, lips and eye shows you need to start bowing down to froch and leave that chinny khan who got kncoked out by a horrific fighter called prescott and a shit fight called limmond... Keep tryin though...you may oneday out debate me...

ive learned from fighting pactards that there is no sense in arguing with a blinded fanboy that cannot admit his favorite fighter has flaws. You are very biased and ignorant. which means that an actual debate is impossible with the likes of you. its like debating george bush. he is just gonna say the same dumb shit over and over. thought you wernt going to respond to me again??already youve lost aload of credibility already.. The reason you are seething is because ive beaten you in this debate worse than jermaine taylors head in the 12th round against froch... Now jog on and live by your word and dont respond to me again..

which makes you what i have thought of you all along. a biased froch nuthugger. thanks for clearing things up im done arguing with another thick headed froch fan. The split decision was warranted. If it was a street fight Froch would have won. But this is a boxing match. But as i said before Dirrell only has himself to blame.Good day. *USA_pugilist translator on* ive lost the debate to slimshandy69 and so ill use the old im not argueing with this superior poster again *USA_pugalist translator off*

Ho i just pulled the BBC report on teh Calzaghe Vs Reid fight: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sport/279246.stm Reid said: "I can't argue with the decision. Joe was the better boxer on the night and I knew I could not catch him for speed."

Nah it has come to early for Dirrell this tournament. Dirrell may become a great boxer further down the line but not in this tournament. If he does think he can duke it out and not run he may find himself on the canvas more often than not.

lmao you should read your posts... I didnt say froch landed alot...but the poit being is, you have to land alot more than 39 punches to bloody the nose lips and create swelling under the eye..froch hits hard, but thats god mode if he can do that with only landing 39...and ill assume those alleged 39 punches half of them were to the body.. Fact is showtime didnt make a fuss aboutt he result, even gary shaw effectively admitted froch won..and certainly admitted it was no robbery and they ****ed up tactically... Shogun verses machida, calzaghe hopkins, robin reid calzaghe are robberies..this my friend was robbery that it was a split decision...all 3 judges should have scored it to froch, by 3 rounds to be precise.. I was actually at the fight, which means i can score it alot better than you, and live i had froch up by 6, re watching on tv i had froch up by 3..with dirrell not winning one round..Whoa Whoa Whoa!! Calzaghe beat Reid comfortably, and thats coming from a guy who was a Reid nuthugger at the time, the only controvercy in that fight was that Paul thomas was allow to keep his Judges licence. Post fight Reid sat on teh apron and said the better fighter won the fight he was too good for me, all the boxing press had it for calzaghe, it wasn't even a close fight to be honest Joe just slowed down after he hurt his hands. the fact is Paul Thomas is an appauling judge and this wasn't his first or his last total brainfart, which why he is a womans boxing judge these days.

Kessler wins it imo.

so now we score boxing on the way someone looks after a fight? Dirrell was never hurt. Froch was. Never said Dirrell won by a large margin. He only has himself to blame for losing the fight by holding and evading excessively. but he was the better boxer in that fight hands down. lmao you should read your posts... I didnt say froch landed alot...but the poit being is, you have to land alot more than 39 punches to bloody the nose lips and create swelling under the eye..froch hits hard, but thats god mode if he can do that with only landing 39...and ill assume those alleged 39 punches half of them were to the body.. Fact is showtime didnt make a fuss aboutt he result, even gary shaw effectively admitted froch won..and certainly admitted it was no robbery and they ****ed up tactically... Shogun verses machida, calzaghe hopkins, robin reid calzaghe are robberies..this my friend was robbery that it was a split decision...all 3 judges should have scored it to froch, by 3 rounds to be precise.. I was actually at the fight, which means i can score it alot better than you, and live i had froch up by 6, re watching on tv i had froch up by 3..with dirrell not winning one round..

lmaoooooooo arthor abraham looked shit.. Froch and Dirrell looked shit, Abraham good. Nothing would fit Froch's style worse than an effective counterpuncher like Abraham.

lmaoooooooo arthor abraham looked shit.. The version of Taylor that fought Abraham would have owned Froch the last 5 rounds of their fight as well. And unlike Froch, Abraham was competitive all the way. Carl took a volume of punches to a tko, while Abraham knocked him out cold with one shoot.