No, sir. Look at who posts there. Look at the target audience.
i didnt read the whole article though... i might read it later
http://goatmilk.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/jackie-chan.jpg
http://wawam.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/manny-pacquiao.jpg
http://oneasianworld.com/blog/about_manny.jpg
i'd go with jackie
disagree.....any insight leading up to this match-up is highly entertaining for me. both camps were interesting. i love both fighters. their professionalism, dedication, and respect for the sport will make this one of the greats.
.
K-None.
I believe that you know what I mean, and I will choose to leave it there.
Please PM me if you really want elaboration.
is jackie chan more good looknig than pacquiao?
I saw Cotto on the Travel Channel w Tony Bourdain. He was wooden.
He also lacked charisma on that MTV Nitro show.
We probably shouldn't expect him to be dynamic at this point.
Manny is a dynamic fighter. Fun to watch. But outside of the ring, his looks and language skills hurt him.
define good looks
almost fell asleep watching that, cant wait for hopkins jones 24/7, that should have some drama lol
It really wasn't as bad as Jones-Calzaghe 24/7. That still got to be the worst one.
That was a great 24/7, idk what you guys are talking about. It will be a great fight, and I think Cotto will take the decision. If Pacquaio wins, I think he wins by knockout.
The thing is...I feel like if Cotto cared less about being professional, I think he'd be really entertaining.
I get the feeling that he's chill as hell and is probably mad fun. It's just when it comes to boxing he takes his professionalism serious.