Why are people saying Dirrell hurt Froch?

froch got hurt at the last 12 seconds of the 10th round.

froch was buzz

Just watched the Showtime version, the lead commentator was a bit OTT. Dirrell threw a left hook in the 11th with deflected off Froch's right glove and he starts screaming "Froch is in trouble!!"......errr no. :lol1: He did buzz him in the 10th though

Someone upload it. At no point did I think Froch was in trouble. I remember Froch busting Dirrell's nose though. The guy didn't want to fight. frochs knees buckled twice!!!!! one from a straight and from an uppercut in the 11 n 12 wat fight did u watch?? they took a point from dirrell for holding but when froch does a 3 hit rabbit punch combo they dont even warn him, they even replayed it, dirrells head is down n froch is chopping away lol. Dirrell could have finished froch if he had more experience, he never jumped on froch when he hurt him

Dirrell buzzed Froch with a left hook in the 10th. He wasnt badly hurt seeing as he was throwing punches 3 seconds later.

he gets hit big and your saying it's to spoil tactics? what if he's recovering? The thing is, I didn't see Froch land much at all. At least nothing big. Like I said that was the only time I remember Dirrell being stunned.

I think it was the 8th where Froch landed the hook and come on I know Dirrell was using the holding to spoil tactics but at the same time after almost every big shot by Froch Dirrell was holding ...even in that 10th round clip fair amount of holding by Andre, leading to the point dediction but his holding makes it hard to tell how much Dirrell's hurt. he gets hit big and your saying it's to spoil tactics? what if he's recovering?

not true. Dirrell was holding on quite a bit in the 6th and 8th rounds after Froch landed some solid shots I thought that was just him trying to spoil and smother Froch's attack. IMO the only time Froch stunned Dirrell was when he caught him with a left hook. Can't remember the round though.

Froch was on queer street twice, Direll was never that hurt. not true. Dirrell was holding on quite a bit in the 6th and 8th rounds after Froch landed some solid shots

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of sh*t again? Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement. cause he did. just cause froch recovered doesn't mean he wasn't hurt. nobody said froch was a sloch in the chin department. he was hurt but recuperated well.

Froch was on queer street twice, Direll was never that hurt.

Froch got hit with three counter shots, was wobbled, then back pedaled to the ropes and covered up.

see that's what I thought. I think the US commentators are dying to look for weakness in UK fighters and fk with US fans heads. Or maybe UK Commentators are biased towards their boy and didn't want to say anything about it. WAIT THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE, THERE'S NO WAY UK FIGHT FANS ARE BIASED IN ANY WAY!

you be the judge.

http://www.picstation.net/image-9D2A_4ADB3594.gif

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of sh*t again? Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement. 1. No, maybe just you. 2. Froch was staggering like a drunk after an assault by Dirrell in the 10th. Only his opinion he could have gone longer. I bet Dirrell would have won if it went longer. Bias ref.

Froch was absolutely wobbled by a counter shot by Dirrel at the end of the round.

lol at this biased retard TS. u can think froch won if u want to. but saying he wasnt hurt is just plain ignorance. he was hit clean and wobbled quite a bit. had his back against the ropes and dirrell was going of throwing punches in bunches. someone said it already but ill repeat. if u didnt see him get hurt you are eighter blind or extremly biased.

cuz he hit him and his legs buckled?? :smashfrea Is it the US commentators filling your head full of sh*t again? Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement.

so why didn't he finish him? yeah he wobbled Froch in the tenth round but froch recovered quickly...and it was near the end of the round. Your blind if you did not see his legs do a little dance