This has to be said!.......

Froch came forward and 80% of the fight Dirrell was back peddling because he was intimidated by Froch, he didn't land that many effective shots as people claim. Froch was controlling the fight, Dirrell was just shooting fast jabs combined with clinching, whining, turning around, ducking down ect... With all that you could tell the judges had a boxing fan mentality... such as... Hey this guy is here to fight and this dude is just prancing about clinching every 5 second, you can score due to activity, ring genralship ect.. and thats what won Froch the rounds on. Dirrell did a good job nullifing Froch's attacks, but turned it into a dirty fight by doing so. I stop reading right there. That is the point of this topic, Froch did nothing but come forward. Didn't land anything!!! Just came forward. That doesn't earn wins. Effective puches do(all landed by Dirrell by the way).

Did you even watch the fight? Did u listen to US army radio?

Froch came forward and 80% of the fight Dirrell was back peddling because he was intimidated by Froch, he didn't land that many effective shots as people claim. Froch was controlling the fight, Dirrell was just shooting fast jabs combined with clinching, whining, turning around, ducking down ect... With all that you could tell the judges had a boxing fan mentality... such as... Hey this guy is here to fight and this dude is just prancing about clinching every 5 second, you can score due to activity, ring genralship ect.. and thats what won Froch the rounds on. Dirrell did a good job nullifing Froch's attacks, but turned it into a dirty fight by doing so. I like this.

Dirrell landed little. Froch out jabbed him, generalship. Dirrells jab was hardly a punch at all-- at least not a scoring shot. Did you even watch the fight? 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

you dont go to the champions backyard, hold all night, have a point deducted, and win a fight where a lot of the rounds are questionable/subjective in terms of what the judge is scoring for. No title/champ in neutral territory Dirrel probably would win that fight by a few rounds, but thats not boxing you got to convincingly beat a champ to take the title.

Dirrell landed little. Froch out jabbed him, generalship. Dirrells jab was hardly a punch at all-- at least not a scoring shot.

Froch was controlling the fight, Dirrell was just shooting fast jabs combined with clinching, whining, turning around, ducking down ect... This is so over-simplified it's stupid. I don't mean any offense by that, but it's true. Dirrell needs to be commended for his counter-punching for starters. It was beautiful at times and it made Froch look very amateur. Great speed, slick footwork, and very elusive. If you appreciate the art of boxing you should be able to see Dirrell's good qualities and not boil it down to the point where he deserves no credit at all. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

I for one can't see how anyone can support a Froch win. Now the truth of the matter is Dirrell did run alot, but he also hurt Frouch (twice), he landed pretty much all the counters, and all the leads. How on earth can you say Froch won when it is clear that he lost? Now don't get me wrong, I give AA and CF credit for the wins(I said AA would beat JT), but anyone going on about Froch winning needs to stop it. Yes he got the "W", but didn't land more than two good punches, and was getting counterd all night long. No hate here, just facts. a green prospect made froch look like an amatuer... dirrell deserved the win, but froch looks like a dunce for not beating a green prospect down.

froch is so bad its not even funny dirrell clearly won the fight,just didnt get the decision,simple as that

You're asking how can anyone think Froch won? That's simple -- it was a close fight. However, on a second viewing I had Dirrell ahead by a point or so. Froch looked like shit. Let's be honest. His MMA tactics were pretty embarrassing as were his constant fouls. Dirrell did get on his bike too much (he fought scared... again, let's be honest), but he out-landed Froch by a silly amount and landed crisp, clean, accurate blows all night. I can understand why Dirrell didn't get the decision. Yes, he won the fight, I agree with this, but does he deserve to be a world champion based on the performance he gave us? It's debatable. I think he needs more work. On the other hand, so does Froch. What the hell... I'm past caring anymore, because neither of them are all that great. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

I for one can't see how anyone can support a Froch win. Now the truth of the matter is Dirrell did run alot, but he also hurt Frouch (twice), he landed pretty much all the counters, and all the leads. How on earth can you say Froch won when it is clear that he lost? Now don't get me wrong, I give AA and CF credit for the wins(I said AA would beat JT), but anyone going on about Froch winning needs to stop it. Yes he got the "W", but didn't land more than two good punches, and was getting counterd all night long. No hate here, just facts. Because people get caught up in concepts of nationalism..and pride...and blind machismo.. Any objective viewers...that don't have some sort of vested interest in either fighter..will decide overwhelmingly for the challenger. But eh.

I agree, Dirrell completely outclassed him, it wasn't a pretty fight, and Andre did A LOT of holding, but he made Froch miss every puch and landed practically every shot he threw at will. The fans who are making the "DIRRELL RAN LIEK A BTCH" threads are just upset that he made Froch look every bit as mediocre as he is.

its over, its boxing, Dirrell will carry on and be KOd so no need to worry about he scorecards next time. ........................Ok :sad:

its over, its boxing, Dirrell will carry on and be KOd so no need to worry about he scorecards next time.