carl froch is a very skillful fighter=fact...

I like Froch but I have a feeling that Dirrell is going to blow his ass out of the water on points. And everyone talks about how he's going to get a KO based of what he did against Taylor. And what didn't achieve anything and was not world class when Froch beat him.

fiction actually.

Heres some facts that are undebatable. 1)froch is the first englishmen to win a medel at the world amature championships..you CANNOT be unskillful and have a very good amature pedigree.Its purely on skill, with the scoring sysem and the prtective head guards, its all about out scoring opponents..froch has a great record amature..where he got robbed in alot of his fights he lost as well. 2)He beat pascal with no debate. Pascal is a entrmely elusive fighter with a good chin and decent power. Froch imo beat him comfortably. Great fight but it was no debate, he won. 3) the jermane taylor myth. On my score card froch was one round down goin into the 12th. Primetime boxing had it evens goin into the 12th and the biased american judges had it a split ecision goin into the 12th, and we all know that the 12th round was watching jermaine taylor being bounced around the ring. Jermane yaylor is brilliant brilliant fighter who will school athor abraham.. FROCH IS VERY SKILLFUL, END OF... He beat Pascal with heart, activity, but he was being made to look slow and ponderous at times.

I like Froch but damn you guys are overhyping him

I've never seen Kessler fight, is he really that bad? Not bad meaning bad, but bad meaning good. He's good but not as good as some people on here make him out to be. He's yet to beat someone world class IMO and when he did stepup, he lost(Calzaghe). The jury's out on Kessler.

I've never seen Kessler fight, is he really that bad? Not bad meaning bad, but bad meaning good. I think he is. He has a lot of good atributes. Look for the calzaghe fight. Is a really good fight showing good techinque from both

Most people have only seen the taylor fight and he went the wrong way about that fight. Truth is that hes a good boxer and is descent. I have him beating dirrell and kessler taking it all

yeah, it takes skill to have a decent chin, power and volume punching Did you even read my post?

Was that before or after you realised that you were wrong ????? After I hit submit and went to see my post, I noticed I made a mistake. You can tell if a post has been edited after a few minutes; a little message will appear after your post. :)

Heres some facts that are undebatable. 2)He beat pascal with no debate. Pascal is a entrmely elusive fighter with a good chin and decent power. Froch imo beat him comfortably. Great fight but it was no debate, he won. 3) the jermane taylor myth. On my score card froch was one round down goin into the 12th. Primetime boxing had it evens goin into the 12th and the biased american judges had it a split ecision goin into the 12th, and we all know that the 12th round was watching jermaine taylor being bounced around the ring. Jermane yaylor is brilliant brilliant fighter who will school athor abraham. Pascals best win at 168 is? It doesn't matter to me how many rounds Froch won in the Taylor fight. When Taylor was fighting at high level in the early rounds, it was a one-sided beating. Froch didn't stand a chance before Taylors level went down. Froch will be defenseless against Kessler and Abraham.

If you got back, you'll noticed I edited my post because I forgot to add the fact that Jack Woodburn had him up. Go re-read it. Was that before or after you realised that you were wrong ?????

Hes not "very skillful" but I think hes more skilled than people give him credit for. People directly compare him to Margarito. But hes not a come forward volume puncher. He'll often wait for his opponent to punch and try to counter. yeah, it takes skill to have a decent chin, power and volume punching

Hes not "very skillful" but I think hes more skilled than people give him credit for. People directly compare him to Margarito. But hes not a come forward volume puncher. He'll often wait for his opponent to punch and try to counter.

Froch has stamina/chin/power. He keeps his hands so low and neglects his defense. I agree... Froch is largely unskilled... he's lucky he has a decent chin, power, and good stamina

Carl Froch = Librado Andrade

Great power, great chin, and talks a lot of sh*t. Hell I like Froch, but I wouldn't call him a skilled boxer.

hes tough,hes not skilful end thread/

FROCH IS VERY SKILLFUL, END OF... Baiting cunt :lol1:

heres the knock out video, watch how the prime time commentators who are american had it evens... Ive won the debate... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8B-CW-lkr4 You seem to be confused. The three scores they kept showing during the fight were from the press. They weren't the commentators. Like I pointed out, the comentator, Al Bernstein had Taylor winning.

heres the knock out video, watch how the prime time commentators who are american had it evens... Ive won the debate... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8B-CW-lkr4