Despite all the BULL*** he's been doing with weight, and racist comments and the fact that he cherrypicked someone, I might give him credit.
The guy doesn't prove MUCH beating Marquez, but he does prove that he is still a top contender. He had a good performance last night.
Even if he couldn't KO Marquez who doesn't have too much of a chin, and the style match up was awful, and the weight difference was huge,he still gave a good performance.
IMO Floyd is probably 2 or 3 p4p in my list now.
Pacquiao better pwn Cotto so we can see Pac - Mayweather!
I give him credit for being a great boxer, his boxing skills are on another level. But last night fights was boring as **** and he couldn't even KO a guy that was fighting at featherweight not long ago.
He has been cherry picking his opponents his whole career and refuses to fight anybody who could potentially beat him, aka guys his own weight.
JMM was more live than DLH for Pac. As long as you don't give Pac any credit for DLH than you would be fair
I don't give him much credit for that, Oscar clearly didn't care that much, came into the fight drained, took Pac lightly, and got his ass kicked for it. No where near the best win of Pac's career, just the most high profile.
im thinking of stans who have the brains to give credit to a guy who spewed racism on a fight..
made a 130 lb guy move up to 144
then proceeds to come in over the limit...
such creatures are beyond laughable...
Dont you think my friend??? :d
lollollol!!!
No excuses and complete full credit if he beats Pac, domination or close fight. Don't compare the shell of Marquez we saw against Floyd to Pacquiao, who actually can fight at welterweight.
JMM was more live than DLH for Pac. As long as you don't give Pac any credit for DLH than you would be fair
will you give him more credit when he beats your boy pac?
No excuses and complete full credit if he beats Pac, domination or close fight. Don't compare the shell of Marquez we saw against Floyd to Pacquiao, who actually can fight at welterweight.