It's true
Think about it.
1.Mosley
2.Cotto
3.Clottey
Cotto fights first, so if he loses to the much smaller man in pacman he's obviously gonna lose his number 2 ranking. So Clottey will be new number 2 and Mosley number 1 therefore for Ring title am I right??
That my friend is a Cotto hater thinking with his head. Now end thread.
How the hell am I a Cotto hater?? I want cotto to knock pacquio out. I got 50 on it... I was jus ****in sayin
If Cotto loses to Pacquiao he would drop to around 4 or 5, so then it would be against number 1 and 2, but if he wins then it shouldn't' but linear titles have been fought over by the number 1 and three guys before.
It's true
Think about it.
1.Mosley
2.Cotto
3.Clottey
Cotto fights first, so if he loses to the much smaller man in pacman he's obviously gonna lose his number 2 ranking. So Clottey will be new number 2 and Mosley number 1 therefore for Ring title am I right??
yes according to the Ring rules, mosley/clottey wouuld be for the WW championship.
If Clottey and Mosley fight for the Ring Title, that would be some straight up bullshit.
That my friend is a Cotto hater thinking with his head. Now end thread.
yeah my mistake the winner of clottey/mosley will be #1, but will still have to take on #2 until the ring recognizes then as champ...but yeah i can't see how a clottey victory puts him over cotto...anyway, if cotto wins, he's in manny's place looking for the biggest money fight, forget a title
it actually makes perfect sense, how do you think mosley leapfrogged cotto in the rankings? by beating the man who beat cotto...the ring title is you either beat the man or beat the man who beat the man, that simple
Cotto will beat Pacquiao and there is no chance Mosley-Clottey is for The Ring belt. Cotto beat both Mosley and Clottey so it would be unfair to put it on the line when Cotto beat both of those guys.