Ok once and for all, lets make a thread about who whines and cries the most over their fighters not getting respect.
Who makes the most excuses when their fighters lose and who overates their fighters...
I know this will start some wars but fuk it....
Damn, you're bitchin' again!!!
When are you gonna stop crying. LOL
You may understand individual words but in the context of real comprehension you are woefully ignorant. At this point whatever 'complaint' I have rises to the level of debate, discussion or argument because I am laying out the rationale of my grievance. Spin doctoring it with sophomoric license does not undo the strength or merit of my contention.
In other words, I am spelling out what you are blithely ignoring with eyes closed, ears covered and feet stomping...your rebuttals are the obtuse and puerile screams of the vanquished Black Knight in Monty Python. You bleat non-sequiturs as though they're going out of style. Grow up.
I think it is the Cotto stans by far. Not only are they like little fucking girls on a period, they don't give any credit to any other boxer that's fought in or near Cotto's division in the present time. I hardly ever hear any Cotto fans praising Paul Williams for taking on Pavlik, and yet they cry about Cotto having to drop one pound to fight little Pac.
I did? Because you think so or because it is so? The opinions of obtuse and myopic minds are not to be taken seriously. They are to be scorned, mocked and derided.
You mean in the same way that Arum was supposed to look after Cotto's interests when he defended margacheato, signed Cotto to a 35% split while at a catch weight for a title? Right...I'm with you on that one, because money has never trumped duty before...and that's why Boxing is not touted as being so corrupt. Got it, chief.
It's not my fault you chose a chicken. Incidentally, was that a conscious decision or was it an instinctual one?
Damn, you're bitchin' again!!!
When are you gonna stop crying. LOL
I am mocking your use of 'irony' because you have it wrong. Literacy is considered cool these days.
now you're complaining about defintions. when will you stop complaining?
147-141 = WW.
140-136 = jr WW.
last time cotto officially weighed in he was a welterweight (146 lbs)
last time pac officially weighed in he was a jr WW (138 lbs)
lol, now you're complaining about my use of irony!!!
I am mocking your use of 'irony' because you have it wrong. Literacy is considered cool these days.
That's precious. Cotto won't be a 147 pounder. He'll be a 145er. And round and round we go.
147-141 = WW.
140-136 = jr WW.
last time cotto officially weighed in he was a welterweight (146 lbs)
last time pac officially weighed in he was a jr WW (138 lbs)
That's your 'A' material, is it? Do you even know what irony is?
lol, now you're complaining about my use of irony!!!
cotto will be shamed. pac is not a 147 lber. remember, he officially weighed 138 lbs against hatton the last time he fought.
they are worried about the weight diff... that's why they pushed for 143 lbs and why there is a penalty for cotto for not making weight. they are taking it seriously.
That's precious. Cotto won't be a 147 pounder. He'll be a 145er. And round and round we go.
wow... complaining about being called a complainer in a thread about complaining. more ironic?
That's your 'A' material, is it? Do you even know what irony is?
You just confirmed to us that you're a nutthuggin' stupid freak.
I did? Because you think so or because it is so? The opinions of obtuse and myopic minds are not to be taken seriously. They are to be scorned, mocked and derided.
Just to inform you both fighters have their own high caliber lawyers who are competent to interpret the stipulations and make concessions to the best interest of their clients. They're more well-informed and knowledgeable than anybody else here in this site. Lets leave the fight provisions to the lawyers and let them earn their living. As a boxing fan it's not your bussines to dabble with the particulars of the fight. Just appreciate that both fighters agreed to face each other in the ring on Nov. 14.
You mean in the same way that Arum was supposed to look after Cotto's interests when he defended margacheato, signed Cotto to a 35% split while at a catch weight for a title? Right...I'm with you on that one, because money has never trumped duty before...and that's why Boxing is not touted as being so corrupt. Got it, chief.
You complained and whined everything under the sun even my freaking avatar. My advice to you STFU moron.
It's not my fault you chose a chicken. Incidentally, was that a conscious decision or was it an instinctual one?
you're underestimating (a.) just how good Pacquiao is and (b.) the fact that the weight disparity come fight night will not be so much greater than some you find in bouts between boxers who supposedly weigh the same
a) pac is a great fighter, but cotto is a very good boxer w/ a size advantage.
b) are you kidding??? cotto will have about a 10+ lbs on pac on fight night. if cotto is smart he will get up to 158-161 lbs. coming in lighter than usual never helps. he needs to just admit that pac has the speed advantage and he has the strength advantage. speed don't beat speed, timing does.
Making someone aware of something is not complaining, simpleton.
wow... complaining about being called a complainer in a thread about complaining. more ironic?
he was 106 over 10 yrs ago, he has fought at 140 and 147 already and passed with flying colors.
the victory over hatton at 140 was legit. the victory over dlh at 147 was just a payday. pac is unproven at 147 lbs.
so if cotto looses (i doubt it) there will be no shame
cotto will be shamed. pac is not a 147 lber. remember, he officially weighed 138 lbs against hatton the last time he fought.
if pac was worried about the weight diff he should not have signed the contract :boxing:
they are worried about the weight diff... that's why they pushed for 143 lbs and why there is a penalty for cotto for not making weight. they are taking it seriously.