Univesal Title - 1 Weight 1 Champion

UNIVERSAL CHAMPION http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m167/jafbox/ibf-chiquito.jpghttp://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m167/jafbox/wbc-chiquito.jpghttp://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m167/jafbox/wba-chiquito.jpghttp://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m167/jafbox/wbo-chiquito.jpg Hi my forum friend!! have a good day!! I'm here tonight to ask you a favor!! Let me explain this maybe someone's remember last year on China during the WBC Convention, that the WBC promotes a universal champion by calling all the organizations that have any respectability and have all our champions meet each other to get only one the universal champion. Every organization (WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO) can keep theirs as their world champion. I believe that this could be a tremendous advancement for TV, for promoters, and for the boxers but leave, at the same time, the authority to the boxing organizations to control their business. Well I believe this idea could be something absolute awesome!! Just need the right direction! The thing i need from you is your opinion, about how they need to handle this, how they will be schedule the title, who will fight for him, the rankings, the design of the belt, everything goes I will be making this on at least 10 forums, and then i will send the post and suggestion to the WBC i was talking with Mauricio Sulaiman about this and he want to read this!! So this is a excellent opportunity to everybody from the forum to have a voice and suggest about this idea Well thats all. Thanks for your time, and attention

Comments (10)

MANGLER

Closest thing we gettin to this is fighters ignorin the alphabet belts and goin for the Ring belt.

16y ago

ianblake

there is only one Universal Champion http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c333/o0javi0o/CarlitosColon2.jpg

16y ago

OnePunch1099

basically just ignore the sanctioning bodies titles, their only purposes in 2009 are revenue related lineal and ring champions are all that matter Yeah, Adamek vs. Bobby Gunn is a great example. lol. Look, Ring is a nice idea, and its good that they dont charge a sanction fee, but the fact that they have no mandatory defenses means the champ can fight whoever he wants, whenever he wants, and can ignore the top ranked contenders until he retires if thats what he wants to do. You cannot expect the fighters and promoters to police themselves. Require a Ring champ to defend against a top 3 contender at least once a year and I'm on board.

16y ago

javier_83

wich could be the best solution

16y ago

Hyperion

boxers are at fault too for the belt mess.....they get notoriety by having this belts, thus they pay the organiisations to have them in their rankings. They will not go away, even if the elite fighters who dont need belts decide to ignore the alphabets(hard since everyone likes cherry picking the weakest title holder, even the superstars), the next level of succesful boxer(ie-your avarage unknown weak title holder)needs those belts to market themselves......

16y ago

bojangles1987

Pretty much every boxing fan wants 1 belt per division, but the likelihood of that happening is very low. Maybe one day when boxing is completely ignored in the U.S. and sanctioning bodies get desperate.

16y ago

basically just ignore the sanctioning bodies titles, their only purposes in 2009 are revenue related lineal and ring champions are all that matter

16y ago

javier_83

so we need i dont know, more time between mandatory defenses and optional defenses?? they need to know how to manage the champions carrer so they dont lose their title on the table

16y ago

gingeralbino

1 weight 1 champion? make sure during the negociations that every single important member of each organisation is present. Shareholders, decision makers etc. Add one strategically placed bomb. Then it might happen.

16y ago

0094

Hi my forum friend!! have a good day!! What the ****s this all about? Not a good start. Anyway, I don't really understand what your talking about. Adding ANOTHER belt, coming from the WBC. I don't like it.

16y ago