news flash. punching more and hitting opponents gloves and arms does not win fight.

Unfortunately nowadays just throwing will win you a fight, especially if the other fighter does not match that activity. The way judges usually are now you have to clearly stun and land bigger punches against a high volume puncher to win a round.

no i definetly thought hopkins won :hail::hail::hail:.

Don't you think Calzaghe beat Hopkins even though he landed 0 clean punches? no i definetly thought hopkins won

Well it won calzaghe alot of fights Look out mr. Smith,that's how i got in the red,speaking the truth about JC!!

It is if u rip a fighters tricep like roy did

It shouldn't come down to sheer activity, but a lotta times it does. Boxers fightin a work horse gotta be prepared for that judgin style of favorin volume.

for all the idiots who think gevor was robbed. he really didnt land as much as much as you might think. sturms defense is top notch, and his punch accuracy is extremely high. so you think gevor won cuz he kept throwing easily blocked shots. your wrong. sorry. :bottle::bottle::bottle: drink up:) NEWSFLASH: WHEN A FIGHTER IS KNOCKED DOWN THAT IS CAUSED BY A PUNCH, it is legitimate.

Well it won calzaghe alot of fights Very very true :D

for all the idiots who think gevor was robbed. he really didnt land as much as much as you might think. sturms defense is top notch, and his punch accuracy is extremely high. so you think gevor won cuz he kept throwing easily blocked shots. your wrong. sorry. :bottle::bottle::bottle: drink up:) Don't you think Calzaghe beat Hopkins even though he landed 0 clean punches?