Tito, easily. Cotto IMO is a hard puncher but more of an accumulation puncher. Tito had the kind of power that could slip through a tight guard( at his natural weight class) and it only took one punch for him to change the fight around. Hes one of the best punchers Ive seen.
The better puncher? No doubt.
But not the better fighter.
Overall Cotto beats Tito in that department.
Tito got outclassed everytime he was ever in against a guy with actual boxing talent (Oscar, Bernard, Winky, even Roy).
Cotto has his own share of flaws but he's able to mix his style up well enough that he can hang just as easily with a volume worker like Margarito (I know he didn't win, but he lasted long past the point where most other guys would've been out) or Clottey, as he can with a solid boxer like Gomez or Quintana, and he can box/punch with boxer/punchers like Mosley as well.
ummm other than oscar tito lost those fights due to size not skill.
anyone had coney island hotdogs?
http://i40.tinypic.com/344yxs6.jpg
there the shit!! best hotdogs ive ever had
i've never had any i've heard their the shit
Should Boxingscene posters start to be drug tested? It will decrease the number of ridiculous threads, Malignaggi was a big puncher then Julian Jackson, Thank You
agreed...tito was an underrated body puncher....it wasnt all head shots all the time...there was a reason why his opponents' hands dropped
agreed
tito's trademark combo?
left hook to the body and left hook to the head...ask vargas
Tito is the bigger puncher and bigger fighter!!Tito is also much tougher than Cotto,but as far as skills are concerned Cotto absolutely outshines Tito,at welterweight Tito was huge,at welterweight Cotto is average!!If they ever fought Cotto's jab would bother Tito to no end,but Tito would always be the bigger puncher of the 2 and while Cotto fades in fights,Tito gets stronger!!
tito's stamina was one of the best in the sport. i believe it took him 29secs to full recover. can't remember well
IMO Trinidad had a bigger punch but Cotto will destroy you with the acomulation of punches, Both very even if you ask me, Tito better head hunter, Cotto to the body..
Idk, Tito went to the body real nice too. But in terms of having a bigger punch, it's not even close. Tito hands down.
Tito is the bigger puncher and bigger fighter!!Tito is also much tougher than Cotto,but as far as skills are concerned Cotto absolutely outshines Tito,at welterweight Tito was huge,at welterweight Cotto is average!!If they ever fought Cotto's jab would bother Tito to no end,but Tito would always be the bigger puncher of the 2 and while Cotto fades in fights,Tito gets stronger!!
IMO Trinidad had a bigger punch but Cotto will destroy you with the acomulation of punches, Both very even if you ask me, Tito better head hunter, Cotto to the body..
Felix easily.
Side note ; Felix is just such a cool fucking name.
How many dudes have you ever ran into named Felix?
Aside from this slick prick, right here.....
http://bavatuesdays.com/files/images/felix_socialist.gif
You don't like the thread then don't respond, questions not for you then. My friend seems to be high on something as he won't admit tito no doubt was the better of the two
your friend must be ch@mpbox@pr.....
cotto has nothing on tito
tito beats cotto
You don't like the thread then don't respond, questions not for you then. My friend seems to be high on something as he won't admit tito no doubt was the better of the two
The better puncher? No doubt.
But not the better fighter.
Overall Cotto beats Tito in that department.
Tito got outclassed everytime he was ever in against a guy with actual boxing talent (Oscar, Bernard, Winky, even Roy).
Cotto has his own share of flaws but he's able to mix his style up well enough that he can hang just as easily with a volume worker like Margarito (I know he didn't win, but he lasted long past the point where most other guys would've been out) or Clottey, as he can with a solid boxer like Gomez or Quintana, and he can box/punch with boxer/punchers like Mosley as well.
You don't like the thread then don't respond, questions not for you then. My friend seems to be high on something as he won't admit tito no doubt was the better of the two
You seem to be high as well for making this thread.
Yet another ridiculous thread. Why not ask who hit harder George Foreman or Tommy Morrison.
You don't like the thread then don't respond, questions not for you then. My friend seems to be high on something as he won't admit tito no doubt was the better of the two