He says he ended Hattons career in 2007, and people don't recover after he beats them...
But then after that he begins to explain how, his dad had a gameplan to stick to, and Hatton didn't listen to the gameplan...
So which is it Floyd? Did he lose because he's shot after fighting you? Or was it because he didn't stick to the gameplan?
It can't be both, because if he's shot because of you, then why even explain the gameplan? It wouldn't matter if he followed it anyway because he's shot right?
IMO Ricky isn't shot... he got in the ring... he got punched in the jaw extremely hard multiple times by a better quicker fighter and he got put on the canvas. And that was that..
Prime fighters can be knocked out, it's boxing... IMO he looked pretty good in the Malignaggi fight. It doesn't mean you're shot... I'm also not saying he ISN'T shot.. I'm just saying we don't know yet.
I think he should have a hometown fight against a C class fighter, and test the waters. See how he feels. See how he looks.. and decide, was it me? or was it Pacquiao?
Even if he was shot, fighting a C class fighter in his hometown would be fine.
*Clap OFF*
Reed whats with the Floyd hate recently?
Floyd said, he thought Hatton shouldve have retired after he fought him. I did not once here the term 'shot' being used.
You have any quotes?
He said when he beats fighters, he beats them physically and mentally... and he should have retired after he beat him? WHY? Because now, he is shot.
I didn't need to hear Floyd say the term shot, to understand what he was saying.
He said he ruined Hatton... ruined=shot.
when your shot, it creates a certain fear, that quality made him not stick to the gameplan, jezus, 1+1 =2 reed. Just like rjj was shot the after that tarver fight :kiss:
You don't have to be shot... to not stick to a gameplan.
Get out of my head reed. I was thinking this very samething.
Floyd does not even realize that he is a bag of contradictions.
Why does this even come as a surprize to us? Floyd does it in all his interviews.
I am fighting for the fans,
No I am fighting for money
I am not fighting for money
I am fighting for the legacy
I want to fight the best
We are not fighting to prove who the best is
I am retired from boxing
I was never retired and I am still pound for pound king
and this goes on and on and on and on his lies dont stop even after dawn.
:ugh:
I should make a video with him contradicting himself left and right, like they did with John McCain
:boxing:
Floyd just said he fights for money and legacy, You dont get boxers that say they dont fight for the money.
He says he ended Hattons career in 2007, and people don't recover after he beats them...
But then after that he begins to explain how, his dad had a gameplan to stick to, and Hatton didn't listen to the gameplan...
So which is it Floyd? Did he lose because he's shot after fighting you? Or was it because he didn't stick to the gameplan?
It can't be both, because if he's shot because of you, then why even explain the gameplan? It wouldn't matter if he followed it anyway because he's shot right?
IMO Ricky isn't shot... he got in the ring... he got punched in the jaw extremely hard multiple times by a better quicker fighter and he got put on the canvas. And that was that..
Prime fighters can be knocked out, it's boxing... IMO he looked pretty good in the Malignaggi fight. It doesn't mean you're shot... I'm also not saying he ISN'T shot.. I'm just saying we don't know yet.
I think he should have a hometown fight against a C class fighter, and test the waters. See how he feels. See how he looks.. and decide, was it me? or was it Pacquiao?
Even if he was shot, fighting a C class fighter in his hometown would be fine.
*Clap OFF*
Reed whats with the Floyd hate recently?
Floyd said, he thought Hatton shouldve have retired after he fought him. I did not once here the term 'shot' being used.
You have any quotes?
He says he ended Hattons career in 2007, and people don't recover after he beats them...
But then after that he begins to explain how, his dad had a gameplan to stick to, and Hatton didn't listen to the gameplan...
So which is it Floyd? Did he lose because he's shot after fighting you? Or was it because he didn't stick to the gameplan?
It can't be both, because if he's shot because of you, then why even explain the gameplan? It wouldn't matter if he followed it anyway because he's shot right?
IMO Ricky isn't shot... he got in the ring... he got punched in the jaw extremely hard multiple times by a better quicker fighter and he got put on the canvas. And that was that..
Prime fighters can be knocked out, it's boxing... IMO he looked pretty good in the Malignaggi fight. It doesn't mean you're shot... I'm also not saying he ISN'T shot.. I'm just saying we don't know yet.
I think he should have a hometown fight against a C class fighter, and test the waters. See how he feels. See how he looks.. and decide, was it me? or was it Pacquiao?
Even if he was shot, fighting a C class fighter in his hometown would be fine.
*Clap OFF*
when your shot, it creates a certain fear, that quality made him not stick to the gameplan, jezus, 1+1 =2 reed. Just like rjj was shot the after that tarver fight :kiss:
Hatton is still a good fighter but i feel his punch resistance has declined.
Hatton was able to take bombs from Tsyzu for 11 rounds but years later couldn't last 2 rounds against Pacquiao.
Pacquiao is a better fighter than Tsyzu but doesn't hit as hard imo.
Brian Kenny said Pacquiao's win was more exciting than his, he said he ruined Hatton.
Brian Kenny said Pacquiao destroyed Hatton in 2 rounds, Floyd said the fight ended so early because he didn't follow Sr's gameplan.
Seems like two different answers to two different questions to me, but that's just to me.
There you go. Very simple really...
Why do you guys act like your new to boxing? This is what Floyd does, talk down fighters and yet people still eat it up and try to find logic in it. He gives credit to very few.
I'm not trying to find logic in it.... I'm trying to make a point because a lot of his fans are unreasonable around here and say his word is the gospel. I am merely pointing out an example of how it isn't.
hatton said he never recovered from the first solid punch pac landed, wtf how did he get cleared to fight. he even said he cried for days, this was more than just losing a fight. hatton lost everything.
that punch he was talking about put him down
hatton said he never recovered from the first solid punch pac landed, wtf how did he get cleared to fight. he even said he cried for days, this was more than just losing a fight. hatton lost everything.
Why do you guys act like your new to boxing? This is what Floyd does, talk down fighters and yet people still eat it up and try to find logic in it. He gives credit to very few.
Hatton might not be "shot" but I think his punch resistance is pretty much gone. That is his problem. He used to rely on that a lot as he has no defence and needs to get inside to get his work done. Now that he can barely take a punch he is a sitting duck for anyone with sufficient pop.
As for Floyd's words, what did you expect? Floyd is pretty much always just talking complete shit.
I would like to see Hatton fight again but Mayweather Sr is also correct when he says Hatton eats more shots than is healthy in the long run. I wouldn't like to see him with Parkinsons or some problem like that.