Hopkins robberies.

Bernard Hopkins always stated that 4 of his losses were robberys,yet he only admits defeat to Legend Roy Jones Jr,some of his losses i can agree that he was robbed but what fights did ya feel Bernard Hopkins rightfully won and was robbed of the victory? And what fights did ya feel Bernard Hopkins rightfully lost and was no robbery cus he was clearly beaten? All four fights were very close. No close fight can ever be called a robbery. He's just a bad loser. So is anyone who can't accept that all very close fights can legitimately be scored either way, and that in those circumstances, the judges' decision is final. A robbery is a fight like Casamayor - Santa Cruz, which most boxing experts scored in favour of Santa Cruz by a wide margin.

Taylor is my current favorite fighter, I thought Hopkins beat him the first time, the second one could have gone either way. If you like clean effective punching or if you like workrate, Judges picked work rate. In the Calzaghe fight I thought he did enough to pull out the win, Calzaghe had a lot in the work rate dept., but unlike Taylor, he ain't land shit on B-Hop. Calzaghe litterally fought air that night. I also thought Hopkins beat Calzaghe.

i thought he won the 1st taylor fight not the 2nd

Both Taylor fights were robberies. Definetly!!! :boxing:

I dont feel he was robbed in any of his fights. He didnt dominate any of his robberies, they were close fights. I watched Lewis-Holyfield with about 30 people all rooting for Holyfield who all felt Lennox got robbed by a draw thats a robbery. A close fight that doesnt go the way you want is just the game.

hopkins won that 1st fight with taylor for sure

Both Taylor fights were robberies.

Lost his 1st pro fight, obviously excusable. Taylor x2 and Joe C 'won,' but didn't really beat Bhop. RJ is the only man to truly defeat Bhop.