Why does Tarver deserve a rematch?

thanks... guess Tarver just wants the cash then? or perhaps he likes public humiliation. Never know..... Malignaggi blew out N'dou in their first fight, and had to get a gift decision in the rematch that people were complaining about N'dou enforcing. That said, I am still putting my money on Dawson winning, and doing it relatively easily.

sorry bud... is this distracting from pacquia-hatton talk? my bad...

thanks... guess Tarver just wants the cash then? or perhaps he likes public humiliation.

He had a rematch clause. Dawson had to do it or be stripped. /thread damn some of uu guys are dense

I don't understand... How can this be justified??? It was in the contract, as it often is. That's all the justification needed. Could have been worse. Tarver might have had a brother Chad would have to fight as well if he won the rematch.. ehem...

I don't understand... How can this be justified??? Because Dawson signed a piece of legal paper known as a contract that stipulated that in the event of a Tarver loss, a rematch would be in order. Law trumps fan demand any day! Plus, there were no other big money fights that would allow for Tarver to be bought off for a fight.

He doesnt deserve one.... He happened to have a clause that granted him one though. I don't think anyone invisioned Dawson blowing out Tarver as bad as he did the first time.

He had a rematch clause. Dawson had to do it or be stripped.