I notice a lot of people here talk about how Mayweather ducks real welterweights for instance Paul Williams. A few people name Williams is one of the guys Mayweather should be fighting and then talk about how Mayweather-Marquez is a ridiculous fight due to being a mismatch. This is the Williams who will most likely be fighting at Light Heavyweight in about a year and you say fighting Marquez is cherrypicking. Also Paul Williams a few weeks ago called out Shane Mosley. Shane did a public interview saying he wouldn't fight Williams as financially it weren't good for him. Imagine if Mayweather said this. Yet there is no hate for Shane for not fighting Williams. I don't agree with a lot of what Mayweather does and I hope he fights Pac, Cotto etc but the double standards on this forum are insane.
In what year should floyd VS cotto or mosely should have fought?
it is crazy because i was having this discussion with another poster in another thread.
Mr boat buyer took the WW world title the same time Cotto beat CQ and Marg beat Clottey. He coulda fought Cotto in their next fights. Surely Cotto woulda passed on Urkal to fight him. Coulda fought him after he beat Hatton and Cotto beat SSM. Both times he passed for DLH. Fine $ wise, not fine legacy wise. SSM? Everybody knows SSM was goin up when Mr boat buyer challenged him yrs back. And of course, SSM knew his role in GBP and balked wit that dumbass tooth shit at the next opportunity cuz the boss was wantin to face Mr boat buyer. Like Cotto after Zab, SSM coulda also faced Mr boat buyer in the back half of '07. He and Cotto turned their attention to each other cuz Mr boat buyer wanted Hatton instead. Now SSM is wide open, but again, no go. Pac at 140 is credible, so no dissin Mr boat buyer for that if it happens at jr WW not WW like he's doin wit JMM.
Pwill ain't a fukkin WW no more, so it's stupid to demand Mr boat buyer fight him. People on here just do that to spite Mr boat buyer's cocksuckers cuz they have worshiped Pwill while they waited for him to come back. And if Pwill could still make WW, SSM deserves to be shit on for flat out sayin he don't ant it wit him. But Mr boat buyer has unfinished business at 147, wit SSM and Cotto.
In what year should floyd VS cotto or mosely should have fought?
it is crazy because i was having this discussion with another poster in another thread.
I dont deal with could have,would have, should have.
In 2006
The top 2 man in the welterweight division were
zab judah and carlos baldomir.
and Floyd Mayweather beat them both. before Miguel Cotto even came to the welterweight division.
In 2006
Miguel Cotto was fighting
Ricardo Torres at 140
Gianluca Branco at 140
Paul Malignaggi at 140
Carlos Quintana at 147 first fight.
So When do you think Mayweather vs. Cotto should have happen?
2007
Mayweather fought de la hoya in the biggest selling fight and boxing history
and then Mayweather fought and destroyed Undefeated Ricky Hatton and highest grossing non-heavyweight fight not involving de la hoya.
2006 : Cotto fighting at Jr. WW while Floyd was fighting Welterweights
2007: Floyd was Fighting Jr. Middleweights and making history. and defeating another top undefeated fighter.
Mosely in 2006:
Toothache
Pwill ain't a fukkin WW no more, so it's stupid to demand Mr boat buyer fight him. People on here just do that to spite Mr boat buyer's cocksuckers cuz they have worshiped Pwill while they waited for him to come back. And if Pwill could still make WW, SSM deserves to be shit on for flat out sayin he don't want it wit him. But Mr boat buyer has unfinished business at 147, wit SSM and Cotto.