Does Froch's victory over Taylor take away from Pavlik's win over him?

Nope. Why should it? Many are talkin like Froch is garbage, but dude is a decent fighter. He and Pavlik should both get full cred for the wins.

I am a Pavlik fan and I enjoy his fights but after seeing that Froch vs Taylor fight I have to wonder. I don't think that Froch is a very high calibur fighter, he is above average (or he wouldn't have the record he does) but not great. I still think Pavlik is a great talent but after seeing Taylor lose like that to Froch it does take away from Pavlik's win for me. And this is no UK vs US type bias, I'm just being honest. I think Sergio Mora will give Pavlik a load of problems as well. no. pavlik physically ruined taylor. hopkins just psychologically ruined taylor.