I saw a pic of him with longer hair and it looked like he had the afro style nappy hair. So does he have some black in him? If he does I'm probably thinking its less than 1/2, max 1/4 because he doesn't look like he has that much black gene.
Pfft... I don't want to "debate" with you. There's no way of debating with a stubborn senseless person like you who believes only what they wish to believe.
Btw there you go again, completely dodging my request for you to post evidence/proof/references. See you're a fuking joke. You state some nonsense and I ask for evidence, you change the fuking subject and say I'm racist. You fuking sad piece of shit. Go ahead, believe that the Pharoahs were black, and believe that one of the greatest ancient civilzations, the Egyptians, were "negroids" if that makes you feel better about your insecurity.
How am I racist? Because I stated facts that you don't agree with? Its not racist to state the fact that Africans were much more primitive society especially in that era. You have no idea how stupid you would look trying to argue against that to educated people worldwide. Just because you feel inferior when you hear that your race is more primitive doesn't mean I'm racist. Your just believing shit you want to believe. You, your beliefs and your professor are a fuking joke. Let me guess, you attended that guys lectures at Rutgers?
It is widely accepted that Eastern Africa was the cradle of civilization yet here you are claiming it was even more primitive then than it is now and that anyone who says different would look stupid arguing with people worldwide. Pac, why don't you step back and do your research? Seriously? If Africans were so primitive, why did the Greeks go to them to learn in those ancient times? What's funny is that you somehow think you sound smart...or that you make sense! You don't. And if you think you do and think I'm an idiot, trust me...I can live with that. In fact, after reading all the stupid sh*t you wrote, I feel better that you think that. This is my last message to you. Write all the BS you want in return.
Yeah bitches, Im so black, I make my shadow look white.:ghost:
Heck Im so black, I make Dikembe Mutombo look like Larry Bird.
Most africans were transferred to the Carribean so its safe to say there are more blacks in Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Jamaica, etc. than there are in Argentina, Mexico, Honduras, etc.
So even if I look light skinned, Im as black as Bernard Hopkins.
Thats nice, but nobody gives a fuk about you.
Why pretend you want to debate? You're a racist f*ck who should've been banned for some of the comments you made.
Pfft... I don't want to "debate" with you. There's no way of debating with a stubborn senseless person like you who believes only what they wish to believe.
Btw there you go again, completely dodging my request for you to post evidence/proof/references. See you're a fuking joke. You state some nonsense and I ask for evidence, you change the fuking subject and say I'm racist. You fuking sad piece of shit. Go ahead, believe that the Pharoahs were black, and believe that one of the greatest ancient civilzations, the Egyptians, were "negroids" if that makes you feel better about your insecurity.
How am I racist? Because I stated facts that you don't agree with? Its not racist to state the fact that Africans were much more primitive society especially in that era. You have no idea how stupid you would look trying to argue against that to educated people worldwide. Just because you feel inferior when you hear that your race is more primitive doesn't mean I'm racist. Your just believing shit you want to believe. You, your beliefs and your professor are a fuking joke. Let me guess, you attended that guys lectures at Rutgers?
You don't understand what a theory is. Theories and facts are two different things. Scientific theories are used to explain facts. Evolution is a fact. Natural selection explains how it works.
prove evolution then
prove humans came from chimps
because I still see chimps...why are gorillas not evolving into metahumans
evolution is NOT a fact
it is a theory
Evolution based on Darwin's theory is a fact, here's some scientific research to support it:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html
if darwin has facts than it would not be a theory
so which is it factual? or theories
dont tell me you believe afrikans came from apes
you need to take that darwin chip out of your brain. Thats a rediculous assertion
Evolution based on Darwin's theory is a fact, here's some scientific research to support it:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html
I for one am shocked that an INTERNET thread, on a site full of anonymous people, that contained a racial element in its title has become a place for vitroilic attacks. /endsarcasm
WHAT, HISTORIANS? LIST THE HISTORIANS INSTEAD OF MUMBLING GIBBERISH WITH NO EVIDENCE.
WHAT HISTORIANS LIKE THAT AFRICAN PROFRESSOR WHO WROTE A BOOK ON HOW NEGROIDS FOUNDED AMERICAS? THE SAME PROFESSOR WHO MOST OTHER SCHOLARS CALLED RIDICULOUS?
see, you're just like those black panther and american black islamists. you believe what you WANT to believe whether there is sufficient basis or not.
You have no idea how laughable it is when you try to act like a scholar and yet your beliefs are radical and unfounded.
Now you're calling buddha black... what's next?
Why pretend you want to debate? You're a racist f*ck who should've been banned for some of the comments you made.
you all care about race enough to write 27 pages on it? this is a boxing forum ffs.
write about something relevent and interesting not some arbitrary BS like this
Most africans were transferred to the Carribean so its safe to say there are more blacks in Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Jamaica, etc. than there are in Argentina, Mexico, Honduras, etc.
So even if I look light skinned, Im as black as Bernard Hopkins.
The African presence in Asia and America has been well-noted by historians--from ancient times even down to TODAY. No such thing as coincidence or accident. Furthermore, their influence in those regions is still obvious today. It is universally accepted that much of the subjects I listed earlier were founded, expounded by a wooly-haired, black skinned race that populated much of the world but came from what is now East Africa. These ideas were spread by this same race to other regions where they settled. This much is clear--as clear as Siddartha Buddha's cornrows, fulls lips and Nigerian nose .
WHAT, HISTORIANS? LIST THE HISTORIANS INSTEAD OF MUMBLING GIBBERISH WITH NO EVIDENCE.
WHAT HISTORIANS LIKE THAT AFRICAN PROFRESSOR WHO WROTE A BOOK ON HOW NEGROIDS FOUNDED AMERICAS? THE SAME PROFESSOR WHO MOST OTHER SCHOLARS CALLED RIDICULOUS?
see, you're just like those black panther and american black islamists. you believe what you WANT to believe whether there is sufficient basis or not.
You have no idea how laughable it is when you try to act like a scholar and yet your beliefs are radical and unfounded.
Now you're calling buddha black... what's next?
The African presence in Asia and America has been well-noted by historians--from ancient times even down to TODAY. No such thing as coincidence or accident. Furthermore, their influence in those regions is still obvious today. It is universally accepted that much of the subjects I listed earlier were founded, expounded by a wooly-haired, black skinned race that populated much of the world but came from what is now East Africa. These ideas were spread by this same race to other regions where they settled. This much is clear--as clear as Siddartha Buddha's cornrows, fulls lips and Nigerian nose ;).
yea but thats like saying we have a little bit of everything in us, a little bit of chimps, gorillas, urangotangs, land mammels...