I honestly though Hatton was a much bulkier bigger dude.
I apparently am mistaken though.
Pacquiao is closing this show early it seems.
....Totally off topic but your sig is a riot.:hail:
If you are watching boxing a long time you will know that size is just a small factor in boxing. Because if size wins the fight Nikolai Valuev will be the all time great.
There's alot more to size in prize fighting.
Pacman is NOT bigger then Hatton lol and that tale of the tape is aload of bollocks (like most of them) Hatton does not have 9 1/2 inch forearms LMAO, do you realise how small that is?
Pacmans wrist is also not 8inchs, Mike Tysons was 7 3/4.
Hatton is bigger
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04kteOU3cr7Ky/610x.jpg
Hatton's just fat in that picture lol
EDIT : Sorry for double post
how is pacquiao's calf JUST a half inch bigger than hatton's?
Because they use a tape measure to measure and it measured half an inch bigger than Hatton's calf....maybe?
I hadn't been able to pick a winner of this fight until I saw those recent pictures and to me Ricky looks weight drained. I think Pacquiao takes this and that Ricky gets shocked by Manny and his speed and possibly gets knocked down early.
:rolleyes:
size is about FRAME. there's a reason why some fighters can go up so much weight classes.
Holyfield, Toney, Moorer
Eh......? Have you seen Toney at HW? Even against the tiny HW Holyfield, he looked like a damn fat, midget-dwarf. He has never looked like he belonged at HW. He looks like a natural 160, 168 pound fighter. That is what best suits his frame. His frame doesn't take the HW limits that he needs to beat other guys. At HW he literally looks like a little guy that has stacked on mass amount of fat because he's lazy.
What about one of the greatest weight jumpers of all, Roberto Duran? He most certainly didn't have the frame to compete properly at the higher weights. He was also a natural 135 pound fighter and not even a big one at that. He was often out-sized in the majority of his LW title fights and when he was at WW, someone like Leonard was man many inches taller and had a freakish reach advantage as well. Are you going to say he had the frame to compete at SMW where he ended up? He had a 130, 135 pound body. He didn't belong any higher and only due to his immense skill was he able to compete at such high weights.
The only he ever got to those weights though was because he was undisciplined and lazy. He could not be bothered to keep in shape, hence him putting on huge amounts of fat. It had nothing to do with 'frame'. :lol1:
These guys are just fat bastards.
What about this one??
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8209/15821630.jpg
Ricky is obviously bigger.
They look near enough the same height in these photos
http://myboxingfans.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hattonpacquiaolondonpc_hoganphotos-1.jpg
http://hosting03.imagecross.com/image-hosting-08/6578hatpac.jpg
Maybe Hatton as grown overnight? :lol1:
ricky is the bigger guy...but that doesnt mean he will win the fight...
anybody that says they are the same size or pac has the advantage in overall mass.....is just on another planet or something.
I honestly though Hatton was a much bulkier bigger dude.
I apparently am mistaken though.
Pacquiao is closing this show early it seems.
My thoughts exactly.
If they are dead even it means Pacquiao has been picking on smaller fighters for a very long time...
He did outweigh Marquez by 4lbs. He came in a whopping 145lbs in the 130lb division.
Yeah, he picked Diaz and De la Hoya too! Smaller Fighters!:D
I'm sorry are you really that stupid? The pics where the angles aren't distorted, they look pretty much the same size.
Teh pics that you posted, the angles are clearly made to look Hatton bigger.
I'm sorry, are you fuking retarded?
What about this one??
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8209/15821630.jpg
Ricky is obviously bigger.
In all the pics on fight news, Ricky looks bigger, WTF?
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/2620/pachatton.jpg
http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/2620/pachatton.jpg
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5990/pachattonv.jpg
I'm sorry are you really that stupid? The pics where the angles aren't distorted, they look pretty much the same size.
Teh pics that you posted, the angles are clearly made to look Hatton bigger.
I'm sorry, are you fuking retarded?
In all the pics on fight news, Ricky looks bigger, WTF?
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/2620/pachatton.jpg
http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/2620/pachatton.jpg
http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/5990/pachattonv.jpg
Pacman is NOT bigger then Hatton lol and that tale of the tape is aload of bollocks (like most of them) Hatton does not have 9 1/2 inch forearms LMAO, do you realise how small that is?
Pacmans wrist is also not 8inchs, Mike Tysons was 7 3/4.
Hatton is bigger
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04kteOU3cr7Ky/610x.jpg
I'm sick of Hatton nutlickers posting this same pic. It's clear Hatton is closer to the camera than Pac. And any unbiased person would know how that would that distort the size. If in fact Hatton was that much bigger than Pac as in that pic, then Hatton would be about 170-180 lbs LEAN in that pic. His shoulder is significantly closer (for a close up shot) than Pac's.
He is bigger, please don't tell me you trust some poxy tale of the tape.
http://img147.echo.cx/img147/2985/tot0tk.png
oh look hattons gained half an inch on his wrist since then.
Those tale of the tape measurements aren't entirely correct, but alot of the stats are reasonable numbers. There are more reasonable numbers than seemingly incorrect ones.