Haven't fully decided yet... They have beat all the greats in their era which is what fighters usually is judged by.. Yet their division was always weak and they even got ko'ed..
They dont have fighter/rivals who can make them better and that has made them overrated in my view, If they had the best fighters from like the 70's then it would have been easy to call them great depending on how they perform against them.
Greats?
Get out of here.
The only fighters of this era with potential to be greats are the Klit's themselves.
I totally agree with you.. Calling any of those fighters he named ''greats'' is an insult to the truly greats.
Yes your bang on.. One is very good and the other one is very average (for a HWC)
All time... Undrerated... Marciano (because of his size)
Overrated... W.Klitschko (see above)
The great fighters in their Era in heavyweight boxing is brewster, Samuel Peter, Ibragimov, Toni Thompson, Calvin Brock, Chris Byrd, Ray Mercer.. The top heavyweight fighters of this generation.. Pre 2000 pretty much
Greats?
Get out of here.
The only fighters of this era with potential to be greats are the Klit's themselves.
The bolded part is the part that I don't understand. Who are the greats?
The great fighters in their Era in heavyweight boxing is brewster, Samuel Peter, Ibragimov, Toni Thompson, Calvin Brock, Chris Byrd, Ray Mercer.. The top heavyweight fighters of this generation.. Pre 2000 pretty much
Haven't fully decided yet... They have beat all the greats in their era which is what fighters usually is judged by.. Yet their division was always weak and they even got ko'ed by some bums (talking wlad)...
What do you think? I'm usually not into these eastern fighters at ALL but what's your call? Most overrated or underrated fighter in heavyweight history?
The bolded part is the part that I don't understand. Who are the greats?