PAC: HATTON'S 'WEAK'
By David Anderson 11/04/2009
Manny Pacquiao has hit back in his verbal fisticuffs with Ricky Hatton, claiming the Hitman has "a lot of weaknesses".
Hatton landed the first blow on Pacquiao, ahead of their
May 2 showdown in Las Vegas, when he rubbished his win over Oscar De La Hoya.
But Pac Man has responded, claiming Hatton will walk into his shots because of his aggressive, come-forward style. "We see a lot of weakness in Hatton," said the world pound-for-pound king.
"I expect him to be coming forward and fight toe-to-toe, and I like that.
"I'm not looking for a knockout.
I don't want any distractions in my mind."
But Pac Man has responded, claiming Hatton will walk into his shots because of his aggressive, come-forward style.
He was exactly right. Also, I was right when I posted that Pacquiao will use Hatton's aggression against him and play more of a counter-puncher role than normal.
I got laughed at for saying that.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
Yes. Hatton is/was extremely weak. That's common knowledge.
Does he still have any of his deluded fans here on this site? Because from what I've seen, he was thrown under the bus and abandoned again.
hatton still got plenty of support here in britain. he took on the best and came up short, no shame what so ever! people defiantly feel a little deflated about the pac loss though, at least with mayweather there was a few excuses to cling onto i.e. the ref.
i dont know what goes on in some peoples brains on this site, of course hattons fans aren't going to come on here ranting and raving about hatton, he got beat, and badley. But that isn't to say his fans arn't there, just licking their wounds
Hatton's a f.ucking legend. If every boxer was willing to take on the best like he did boxing would be a hell of a lot better.
No shame in losing to the best. There is shame in not taking on the best.
I guess that answers my question. lol
Yes. Hatton is/was extremely weak. That's common knowledge.
Does he still have any of his deluded fans here on this site? Because from what I've seen, he was thrown under the bus and abandoned again.
Hatton's a f.ucking legend. If every boxer was willing to take on the best like he did boxing would be a hell of a lot better.
No shame in losing to the best. There is shame in not taking on the best.
Yes. Hatton is/was extremely weak. That's common knowledge.
Does he still have any of his deluded fans here on this site? Because from what I've seen, he was thrown under the bus and abandoned again.
lol hatton sucks
ignoring ure post completley, looking at your favourite fighters i'm curious, who u going for if
Pac v cotto
pac v pbf and
cotto v pbf fight?
he said he had 'a lot of weaknesses' quoting it as him saying 'hatton is weak' in your title is misleading. so what anyway, this was prefight talk and it was hardly massive trash talk, pac didn't face the greatest version of DLH and hatton does have lots of weaknesses, talk about pointing out the obvious
PAC: HATTON'S 'WEAK'
By David Anderson 11/04/2009
Manny Pacquiao has hit back in his verbal fisticuffs with Ricky Hatton, claiming the Hitman has "a lot of weaknesses".
Hatton landed the first blow on Pacquiao, ahead of their
May 2 showdown in Las Vegas, when he rubbished his win over Oscar De La Hoya.
But Pac Man has responded, claiming Hatton will walk into his shots because of his aggressive, come-forward style. "We see a lot of weakness in Hatton," said the world pound-for-pound king.
"I expect him to be coming forward and fight toe-to-toe, and I like that.
"I'm not looking for a knockout.
I don't want any distractions in my mind."
Bump.:haha: