Everytime I go in some Margarito - Cotto threads many people say "Fight should be a NC, margarito cheated" don't get me wrong, I'm not a Margarito fan at all, I like Cotto more but.. there is no proof that he cheated in THAT fight...
:dead:
You're right, there isn't a shred of proof. That cannot change the cloud of suspicion that will always hand over that fight though.
Spot on Jab. We may never know for certain because there likely will not be a full investigation of events prior the SSM fight. Only hope there is is that Margarito or Capetillo writes a book in about 10 years time.
Opinionwise I'd say that I'd put real money on Margarito fighting with loaded gloves in his fights after Paul Williams.
It's such a bad case for boxing. I hope this happens:
1: Marg and Capetillo gets locked up.
2: The responible supervisors from the CSAC gets fired
3: Rules changed so the commision supplies the wrappings. (I thought that was the case, but apparently it isn't.)
Everytime I go in some Margarito - Cotto threads many people say "Fight should be a NC, margarito cheated" don't get me wrong, I'm not a Margarito fan at all, I like Cotto more but.. there is no proof that he cheated in THAT fight...
:dead:
You're right, there isn't a shred of proof. That cannot change the cloud of suspicion that will always hand over that fight though.
the blood stain on the wrap was the same for the cotto and mosley fight, but it was not cotto's blood. it was margs blood. its obvious that cotto's blood was not the stain found on margs wraps because the blood can't go thru the glove but it doesn't mean it has to be cotto's blood to prove marg used the wraps for the cotto fight. its obvious marg had injured his hand and thats how the blood got on the wraps. we seen the pics of the stain after the cotto fight and after he tried to cheated against mosley, so thats proof he used the same wraps for cotto and then attempted to use them for mosley. capetillo and margs team already admitted they used the same wraps over and over and capetillo said he always wrapped margs hand the same. thats proof enough he did cheat on cotto, end of story. lets move on and forget this because the csac is obviously not gonna do nothing about this and sweep it under the rug.
Here is where the saying "What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas" helps out Margacheato. Margacheato will fight in the slums of TJ while Cotto will fight in the Garden. Who is the winner now.
who cares, margarito is overrateed and overhyped and cotto shouldn't have lost to a fighter like margarito even if he did have illegal wraps,cotto should be a shamed. margarito is suspended right now so he did do something illegal or he wouldn't be suspended
margo definitely is a cheater, but we only have evidence that he cheated against mosley, not against cotto.
NO he wanted to cheat against Mosley but got caught before the fight started, and lost that fight.
Yeah, there is no evidence…. again and again, you said it before and I told you that I agree, I just asked for your opinion.
Me I don’t suspect it, I’m sure he cheated before.
No honest fighter turn in a cheater at the end of the career (or almost the end), especially after such an accomplishment !!!!
BTW, I’m not a Cotto fan or Margarito hater.
you are certain he cheated before the mosley fight on no evidence. that's about as certain that george bush was about there being WMDs in Iraq.
once again... there was/is no smoking gun for either WMDs in iraq, nor for margo cheating before mosley.
You can't say that it was on the outside of the wrap only. Why couldn't it soak in deep enough to leave the stain found on the wraps that were discovered pre-Mosley?? That's the nature of gauze and whatever erroneous liquid it encounters. It's going to soak it up, end of.
that's definitely a possible scenario, but if its true then the blood on the pads must be cotto's. that's why cotto and his attorneys need to get those pads tested.
If I'm on a jury and I see photographs of that blood stain matching up on pre-Mosley wraps and post Cotto wraps, knowing that he fought nobody in between that time, that outweighs Marg's lawyer saying "you can't prove it's Cotto's blood!!". Where else would a dried up blood stain in the same location in both pictures come from??
no it doesn't. blood/DNA tests always beat photos
I mean you have to use common sense to bridge the gaps a bit. If you give me a list that says A, B, __, D and E.... I'm more inclined to say that the answer is C instead of L, 3.14, a balloon and a 1979 Ford Pinto because I can't prove it isn't.
you are correct, common sense should be able to bridge gaps, but that gap is humongous. the only evidnce that we have of margo cheating is the mosley fight. That means I only give you a list of A, _, _, _, _, _... now what can u conclude?
And green K for you for bringing a respectful debate instead of throwing some kind of all too common tantrum.
yes everybody should be respectful instead of just reacting on emotion. kudos to you
I suspect that margo cheated before the mosley fight, but there is no proof that he in fact actually did cheat before the mosley fight.
Yeah, there is no evidence…. again and again, you said it before and I told you that I agree, I just asked for your opinion.
Me I don’t suspect it, I’m sure he cheated before.
No honest fighter turn in a cheater at the end of the career (or almost the end), especially after such an accomplishment !!!!
BTW, I’m not a Cotto fan or Margarito hater.
because that would link the pads to the Cotto fight
if its not cotto's blood there is no way to link the pads to the cotto fight.
nope. the hard fact is that there was blood on the pads prior to the molsey fight, but there is no link to the cotto fight. the blood on the wraps in the photo was on the outside of the wrap. you have to find a way for the blood to get inside the wrap, inside the gauze.
once again, the pads were inside gauze, inside several layers of tape. it is not obvious that the pad found before the mosley fight were reused from the cotto fight.
the only way to link the blood on the pads to the cotto fight is if the blood is cotto's blood.
You can't say that it was on the outside of the wrap only. Why couldn't it soak in deep enough to leave the stain found on the wraps that were discovered pre-Mosley?? That's the nature of gauze and whatever erroneous liquid it encounters. It's going to soak it up, end of.
If I'm on a jury and I see photographs of that blood stain matching up on pre-Mosley wraps and post Cotto wraps, knowing that he fought nobody in between that time, that outweighs Marg's lawyer saying "you can't prove it's Cotto's blood!!". Where else would a dried up blood stain in the same location in both pictures come from??
I mean you have to use common sense to bridge the gaps a bit. If you give me a list that says A, B, __, D and E.... I'm more inclined to say that the answer is C instead of L, 3.14, a balloon and a 1979 Ford Pinto because I can't prove it isn't.
And green K for you for bringing a respectful debate instead of throwing some kind of all too common tantrum.
I agree there is no proof, but tell me: do you really believe that he was honest until the Mosley fight????
Me, I think he's born a cheater !!!
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to become the champion of the strongest division without cheating to take such a risk to ruin a brilliant career.
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to demolish Cotto, the undefeated champion, in his prime, to cheat against the old Mosley one of Cotto victims.
Well, in a court those aren’t evidences but on a boxing forum I think it works.
So, you still believe he was innocent until Mosley fight ??????????????
I suspect that margo cheated before the mosley fight, but there is no proof that he in fact actually did cheat before the mosley fight.
No we only have proof he tried to cheat against Mosely , leaving the doubt did he cheat against other opponents.
true, he only tried to cheat against mosley. thanks for the correction
margo definitely is a cheater, but we only have evidence that he cheated against mosley, not against cotto.
I agree there is no proof, but tell me: do you really believe that he was honest until the Mosley fight????
Me, I think he's born a cheater !!!
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to become the champion of the strongest division without cheating to take such a risk to ruin a brilliant career.
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to demolish Cotto, the undefeated champion, in his prime, to cheat against the old Mosley one of Cotto victims.
Well, in a court those aren’t evidences but on a boxing forum I think it works.
So, you still believe he was innocent until Mosley fight ??????????????
Not quite. I mean think about it. Why would it matter whose blood it is??
because that would link the pads to the Cotto fight
The fact that it's there means that he wore the same wraps he was caught with during the Cotto fight. You're right, it probably wasn't Cotto's blood, I have no idea how it would get in there either. But that's beside the point.
if its not cotto's blood there is no way to link the pads to the cotto fight.
The hard facts are that there was blood on the wraps he almost wore to fight Mosley, and it's in the same spot as the ones he wore when he fought Cotto.
nope. the hard fact is that there was blood on the pads prior to the molsey fight, but there is no link to the cotto fight. the blood on the wraps in the photo was on the outside of the wrap. you have to find a way for the blood to get inside the wrap, inside the gauze.
How an old dried up blood stain magically appears on his wraps in the same spot where blood was seen after the Cotto fight....... yet happens BEFORE the Mosley fight isn't hard to figure out. It's pretty obvious that the wraps were re-used. Cotto blood or leprechaun period blood, those wraps are the same.
once again, the pads were inside gauze, inside several layers of tape. it is not obvious that the pad found before the mosley fight were reused from the cotto fight.
the only way to link the blood on the pads to the cotto fight is if the blood is cotto's blood.
margo definitely is a cheater, but we only have evidence that he cheated against mosley, not against cotto.
No we only have proof he tried to cheat against Mosely , leaving the doubt did he cheat against other opponents.
17y ago
what part of "there is no proof" do you not understand? | BoxingScene Community