Petition to the WBA

well done blackirish gonna write a strong email... hopefully they have the sense to make this an NC and remove the loss from holyfields record.

This is the WBA's chance to show the boxing world that they are legit by doing something about this ridiculous robbery. It would send a good message to the rest of the boxing associations as well as fighter's fighting for their own title.

Didn't you see Holmes-Spinks II or Ottke-Reid or DLH-Sturm? Much, much worse than this. Bullshit. This fight was MUCH worse.

A judge had Valuev winning 8 rounds to 4. Are you serious with this? Holyfield won 5 of the first 6 rounds without question. no one on this entire site had Valuev winning. not one. Those Judges should have ****ing Mossad on their asses. Their faces should have been photographed and shown more. Only their names are briefly read out loud... Perfect for fixes. No one does anything about it. I will never pay for a sport like this. Never ever ever. I prefer to watch ANY MMA fight than that shit!

was all paid and organized...of course,valueve wont lose in europe otherwise against a american seen the not good rapport btwn usa and russia. anyways i got 10 round for holy and 2 for valuev...hoyfield is been robbed

I'd like the WBA to show some balls and to call that a no contest, and order a rematch. Utter disgrace. But it does show how bad the HW division is now. It's worse than pre-tyson. The Holyfield of the early 90s would have destroyed Valuev. Valuev was meant to be at his peak. Only in height, i'm afraid. Lol.

maybe Im missing something. If everyone in the world thought that a certain fighter won other than the judges...then it would be considered a robbery, right? cmon. what the hell? That's right. But posters here on NSB had Valuev winning.

holyfield won 5 of the first 6 no question. valuev 2 rounds clearly the rest i saw as close rounds and gave most to holyfield either way two judges definitley scored it wrong holy field landed better power punches all night long... clear robbery but it doesn't matter neither of them are a force in the division... i don't know why i expected more from valuev its probably a blessing for holyfield maybe he might retire now! even though its probly to late

maybe Im missing something. If everyone in the world thought that a certain fighter won other than the judges...then it would be considered a robbery, right? cmon. what the hell?

I would seriously like to see your scorecard, because it is absolutely ridiculous. I did have Holyfield winning make no mistake there. My scorecard is here: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=232595

tell me. what was the crowds reaction to the fight? and if no one at all thinks that Valuev won other than the judges...then surely its a robbery? If I wanted to, I look at Chavez vs. Whitaker and pick out 6 rounds that Chavez could have won. its still arobbery, because no one actually had him winning that many rounds. couldve sworn I heard Valuevs trainer saying he needed a knockout to win.... They booed the decision, but not too bad. I've heard worse. Even at Ottke fights :lol1: Regarding the trainer I guess Enzo said the same to Joe when he fought Hopkins. A motivational ploy.

I didnt watch it with commentary. And I never was impressed with Al Bernstein BTW other than in the Orlando Canizales-Jimmy Navarro fight were he made me lol. Holyfield danced around all night with Valuev doing the stalking (in a cumbersome way). I would seriously like to see your scorecard, because it is absolutely ridiculous.

I know that I watched on tele and the judges watched ringside. I also know that a lot of the rounds were void of action hence close, so points must by rule be given to the aggressor. Bat, Valuev was walking around slowly following Evander that's all, he wasn't punching much or anything. That is not aggression. Evander was throwing more, landing more, coming in more, fighting more. I'm serious stunned you think it was so close mate, really I am. I can't think of a recent fight say in the last year or two, where I've genuinely felt there was a serious robbery. Valuev did certainly not win a round up until round 6, and at absolute most being generous won 3 but even that is pushing it. I will watch it back again but intend on petitioning and if people feel that way I'd say do so, say by email I guess.

I had it 115-113 Holyfield. So it was a close fight with a lot of close rounds that was difficult to score. Especially in front of the tele. The robbery cry here on NSB right now is kinda lame. The question one gotta ask oneself is: Could you see the other guy winning? Although I had Holyfield winning, I can understand the 2 judges that saw it differently. What the hell kind of broadcasting did they have over there? I scored it 10-2 Holyfield. All the rounds were crystal clear. Id accept 9-3 Holyfield, but anything beyond that is dishonest. Evander ****ing BOXED his ****ing ears off. What did Valuev land, maybe 5 punches in the entire fight? Not only did Evander dictate the pace of the fight and land more punches. He landed the ****ing cleaner harder punches.

I believe an exact quote from Al Bernstein during this fight was "Valuev has not won any round the entire fight by aggression" I didnt watch it with that commentary. And I never was impressed with Al Bernstein BTW other than in the Orlando Canizales-Jimmy Navarro fight were he made me lol. Holyfield danced around all night with Valuev doing the stalking (in a cumbersome way).

Valuev got maybe 2-3 rounds, Holyfield 6-7 rounds. Some rounds were even. But no way that Valuev won this, no ****in way.

The question one gotta ask oneself is: Could you see the other guy winning? Although I had Holyfield winning, I can understand the 2 judges that saw it differently. I honestly can't. The worse I can see it is 114-114 even with every round I saw as close going to Valuev. How you could give it to him by four rounds is totally beyond me.

I know that I watched on tele and the judges watched ringside. I also know that a lot of the rounds were void of action hence close, so points must by rule be given to the aggressor. tell me. what was the crowds reaction to the fight? and if no one at all thinks that Valuev won other than the judges...then surely its a robbery? If I wanted to, I look at Chavez vs. Whitaker and pick out 6 rounds that Chavez could have won. its still arobbery, because no one actually had him winning that many rounds. couldve sworn I heard Valuevs trainer saying he needed a knockout to win....

:rofl: @ anyone saying it wasnt a robbery valuev=landed under 20 jabs...ZERO power punches holy=landed power punches in every round...and more hooks than nikolai jabs ****in incredible

I know that I watched on tele and the judges watched ringside. I also know that a lot of the rounds were void of action hence close, so points must by rule be given to the aggressor. I believe an exact quote from Al Bernstein during this fight was "Valuev has not won any round the entire fight by aggression"