Why is it that....

Pacquiao never won a title at 126. He beat the recognized champ Barrera but Barrera had given his belt up beforehand. He also got robbed when they gave him a draw vs. Marquez despite clearly winning Beating the recognized champ is the only real championship that matters. I think you got things backwards.

If Pacquiao is not a former Featherweight champion then Joe Calzaghe is not a light heavyweight champion. simple. Pacquiao 5 Division champion Eusebio Pedroza-----------------Hamed-Barrera-Pacquiao

Made no sense to deny him credit for the MAB win, which was for the Ring belt.

Aight thanks for clearing that shit up...shit is whack but thanks bruh..

Padded is the right word. The tko over mab to take the ring belt at 126 dot count...thats one of his most important fights and what open his ****in doors..you feel me? i agree it's BS but that's how they count titles **** boxing :peeright::boxing:

Padded is the right word. The tko over mab to take the ring belt at 126 dot count...thats one of his most important fights and what open his ****in doors..you feel me?

Pacquiao never won a title at 126. He beat the recognized champ Barrera but Barrera had given his belt up beforehand. He also got robbed when they gave him a draw vs. Marquez despite clearly winning