Nobody can speak for what's "good for boxing"

The only reason why you watch boxing is because you are gay and enjoy watching men sweat. http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/member.php?u=113305 Yea, i thought so. http://www.u-mad.org/haterz.html Did you really try to make a gay joke? Homophobia is for mental weaklings. And anyway it would be better aimed at the people who posted the gay pics.

Wow Dude get an exorcist! We're fellow natives. We need to stick together.

Wow Dude get an exorcist!

What a stupid, poorly thought out thread this is. I have no idea what inspired the threadstarter to make this thread. Its not very difficult to think of things that would be "good for boxing." A young heavyweight like a new mike tyson type of boxer would be great for the sport of boxing. The heavyweight division needs more excitement. Tyson brought in many new boxing fans in the late 80's. He was the first boxer i liked. Floyd mayweather brought many fans to the sport. Im confused as to why this thread was made, it makes no sense. The threadstarter should not be allowed to make threads. You are a lowlife. It's not good for boxing that poorly educated trash like you follow it.

you dismiss the question? tyson has like 8 of the top 10 highest selling pay-per-views of all-time. you know what that means? he attracted people to boxing such as myself. without tyson, I don't know if I would have even been a boxing fan. Yep. Virtually everyone knows about Mike. The casual man in the street. Hell, the casual grandmother in the street knows who Tyson is. And she is terrified! 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

Answer me, you little coward. You little bitch. I'm on the phone

If you assume, which I don't, that PPVs with more sales are "good for boxing," then the Tyson question still is not answered. Tyson also made boxing disreputable among mainstream media and respectable Americans. lol, you really need to study the history of boxing then. boxing has always been about drama and will always be about drama. that is what makes boxing, boxing. Your opinion and perspective is understandable, but it is your opinion and what you think is right isn't what most people think is right. People like Tyson, Haye, Ali are important to boxing. and chances are, you yourself might not have been a boxing fan had it not been for Ali or Tyson.

You gotta understand the psychology of this shit, you fuсking coward. Fights and fighters that can get the attention of people who aren't fight fans turn them into fans. Anytime you can make a fan out of someone who never before gave a shit about boxing... ...IT'S GOOD FOR BOXING. Is it good for boxing that the illiterates on this site troll about Paul Williams or David Haye?

you dismiss the question? tyson has like 8 of the top 10 highest selling pay-per-views of all-time. you know what that means? he attracted people to boxing such as myself. without tyson, I don't know if I would have even been a boxing fan. If you assume, which I don't, that PPVs with more sales are "good for boxing," then the Tyson question still is not answered. Tyson also made boxing disreputable among mainstream media and respectable Americans.

And why do supposedly hardcore boxing fans want boxers to "capture the world's imagination." In some respects boxing is best as a cult phenomenon.

good article..........

Was Tyson "good for boxing?" Some assume 'yes', some think more carefully and say 'no'. I think most carefully and dismiss the question and misstated. you dismiss the question? tyson has like 8 of the top 10 highest selling pay-per-views of all-time. you know what that means? he attracted people to boxing such as myself. without tyson, I don't know if I would have even been a boxing fan.

Suck cock, scum skin. It's easier for a Great American fighter to capture World recognition than it is for a Great German fighter. Why? Because there's been so many other Great American fighters before him. So it's always best that things stay the same?

Was Tyson "good for boxing?" Some assume 'yes', some think more carefully and say 'no'. I think most carefully and dismiss the question and misstated.

Floyd God-motherfuсking-damn Mayweather is good for boxing. He's quite good AT boxing.

Floyd is just as boring as Wlad, that is to say i like them both.

Fuсk off, harlot. A Heavyweight champion who could capture America like Tyson did would be good for boxing. Is it good for boxing in Germany, Russia, the Philippines, and the UK, where some of the big fanbases, TV stations, and promotional companies are? Boxing doesn't even need America. We are one small country with about 5% of the world's population