Before Mayweather announced his retirement about 6 months ago he was recognized as the P4P kingpin of the sport. Now that he is retired, Manny Pacquiao is considered the P4P king. Let's not forget that before Mayweather retired, many experts placed Manny in the number 3 or 4 position in the P4P rankings just behind Cotto or Calzaghe, while JMM usually landed one slot behind Pacquiao. What has happened since then? Margarito knocked out Cotto (widely recognized as the number 2 p4p at the time behind Mayweather), Calzaghe dismantled Roy Jones Jr, (once the undisputed p4p king, way past his prime though), and Marquez stepped up a division and knocked out Joel Casamayor (Universally recognized as the "Real" lightweight champion at the time) and Pacquiao TKO'd De La Hoya (one of the all time greats but also way past his prime). So if Mayweather returns is he automatically back to Number 1? If not then was Manny's win over a faded De La Hoya really enough to put him in front of the pack, even though before this win he was widely recognized as the number 3 or 4 in p4p rankings and why? ( everyone should have something to say on this subject and i'd like to read everyones opinion so please Post!)
So, are you saying that Pacman has to fight Ivan Calderon, Joe Calzaghe, Bernard Hopkins, Antonio Margarito and Vic Darchinyan to be P4P's best? Your brains are wire differently, that's why boxing pundits created this mythical P4P list, because not all boxers are of the same weight.
Your argument is too shallow to say the least...
pacquiao is a great fighter... and i was impressed with the way he was able to dominate de la hoya.. I just think that when i fighter gets the type of spot light and superstar status such as pacquiao they tend to not have to fight the best anymore and still be considered the best.. back when he fought barrera and morales and marquez the first time around that was some real respectable shit!.. he continues to improve but all i'm saying is that his competition is declining.. and it's not like there's not serious compitition out there.. but he chooses to go for the bigger money fights which is probably the same that i would do if i were him. but my point is that there is big fights that he can take with much more of a challenge.. any other lightweight champ besides diaz (casamayor at the time, cambell,), juan guzman (fatty)LOL, humberto soto, JMM (a third fight would be awsome), juan diaz, edwin valero (unproven but young and hungry and champ at the time and incredible knockout against bums maybe but still). I'm just saying that everyone knows that these were all better challenges than his recent fights in the past two years or so. Barrera a second time(old and coming off a loss to marquez), david diaz(fought for vacant title never beat champ), jorge solis(who?), de la hoya (old and washed up and he was even the smaller man the night of the fight so there was no size advantage), marquez (much respect to pacman for this victory). it's like u reach superstar status and no longer have to prove urself. Ur just the best cuz that's the way it is and u know longer have to prove it cuz u beat the best in the past and victories over anyone will hold u in that position. But i know that i'm slicing my own throat by saying stuff like this cuz i'm definately out numbered but whatever. A victory over Mayweather would without a doubt make manny the best though.
pacs last four fights were against barrera, marquez, diaz, and de la hoya.. Niether of them were even ranked in the p4p lists at the time they fought except for marquez and he was ranked around number 6 or 7 or so. Barrera was just a name the second time around and Diaz was the least credible of all the lightweight champions and de la hoya is just a name with huge marketing capabilities. To be the best u have to beat the people considered the best at the time u fight them. when has pacman done that recently with any fighter lately? remember that i said someone who is considered the best at the time.. not the best along time ago?
So, are you saying that Pacman has to fight Ivan Calderon, Joe Calzaghe, Bernard Hopkins, Antonio Margarito and Vic Darchinyan to be P4P's best? Your brains are wire differently, that's why boxing pundits created this mythical P4P list, because not all boxers are of the same weight.
Your argument is too shallow to say the least...
He wouldn’t even be in the P4P ranking; he has to start all over again
I'm surprised as big a PBF fan as you can see that Flawless, yet the TS who swears he ain't arguin or a PBF fan can't. :rofl:
dude... cotto was considered number 2 on most p4p lists... u have to remember that there is no "official" p4p list.. but on 8 out of 10 cotto was always number two after he beat mosley... don't try to flip it.. and answer the question... who fought the better oppenent since mayweather retired?
Joe C fought RJ. Pac fought Diaz and DLH. Marg fought Cotto. JMM fought Casa. Good wins for all these guys, but Pac was #2 back in '06, and stayed there til PBF quit and he was bumped up. Joe C had been at #3 for a while too. I think you mean Cotto was #2 at WW, not p4p, and even that wouldn't be right. PBF was WW champ and Cotto ranked #1. The linear title at WW retired w/ PBF and Marg took the #1 spot when he KO'd Cotto. You're confused homey.
Who the hell had Cotto ranked #2 p4p at any point? He was never up that high, thus Marg didn't climb that high when he beat him. JMM's win over Casa vaulted him past Joe C, and was more impressive than Joe's win over Jones so he stayed there. And all this was happenin while PBF was retired. So how does Pac not deserve the #1 spot homey?
pacs last four fights were against barrera, marquez, diaz, and de la hoya.. Niether of them were even ranked in the p4p lists at the time they fought except for marquez and he was ranked around number 6 or 7 or so. Barrera was just a name the second time around and Diaz was the least credible of all the lightweight champions and de la hoya is just a name with huge marketing capabilities. To be the best u have to beat the people considered the best at the time u fight them. when has pacman done that recently with any fighter lately? remember that i said someone who is considered the best at the time.. not the best along time ago?
did u read my post? does pac really deserve the number 1 spot? Cotto was number two and margarito knocked him out and calzaghe was behind him (in most p4p lists) and he beat jones (which was badly faded just like de la hoya) and JMM was usually ranked one slot behind Pacquiao and he beat Casamayor who came off a huge win over katsidis? So who fought the highest caliber of opponent out of these guys?
PACQUIAO...
You haven't seen the trends lately, you fight Pacman, you grow old overnight, he makes you fade, and fade bad that you wanna be somewhere else instead of fighting him, that's how good he is. Where was that P4P list that you talked about that Cotto at no. 2? It's been years that Pacman is solidly entrenched at no. 2, and with the way PBF's been avoiding the top WW (Cotto, Marg, Williams), even if he's still active today, it's just a matter of time before Pacman snatches that mythical throne from him.
Who the hell had Cotto ranked #2 p4p at any point? He was never up that high, thus Marg didn't climb that high when he beat him. JMM's win over Casa vaulted him past Joe C, and was more impressive than Joe's win over Jones so he stayed there. And all this was happenin while PBF was retired. So how does Pac not deserve the #1 spot homey?
dude... cotto was considered number 2 on most p4p lists... u have to remember that there is no "official" p4p list.. but on 8 out of 10 cotto was always number two after he beat mosley... don't try to flip it.. and answer the question... who fought the better oppenent since mayweather retired?
did u read my post? does pac really deserve the number 1 spot? Cotto was number two and margarito knocked him out and calzaghe was behind him (in most p4p lists) and he beat jones (which was badly faded just like de la hoya) and JMM was usually ranked one slot behind Pacquiao and he beat Casamayor who came off a huge win over katsidis? So who fought the highest caliber of opponent out of these guys?
Who the hell had Cotto ranked #2 p4p at any point? He was never up that high, thus Marg didn't climb that high when he beat him. JMM's win over Casa vaulted him past Joe C, and was more impressive than Joe's win over Jones so he stayed there. And all this was happenin while PBF was retired. So how does Pac not deserve the #1 spot homey?
pac was #1 p4p before he koed delahoya... and and mayweather shouldnt even be ranked because he retired from the sport. maybe you can rank his legacy to all the other retired boxers.
i know he's retired but the question is if he returns
Pac was #1 p4p way before his win over DLH. PBF passed that moniker on to Pac when he quit. And at this point, Pac's takin on all comers>PBF's dodgin WW challengers and he likely woulda surpassed him anyway.
but before cotto lost to margarito he was number 2... No doubt about that! so why wasn't margarito made number 2 or 1 after that?
Why the hell would anything change unless Pac gets beat?
did u read my post? does pac really deserve the number 1 spot? Cotto was number two and margarito knocked him out and calzaghe was behind him (in most p4p lists) and he beat jones (which was badly faded just like de la hoya) and JMM was usually ranked one slot behind Pacquiao and he beat Casamayor who came off a huge win over katsidis? So who fought the highest caliber of opponent out of these guys?
well no one ever beat mayweather and the only thing that manny did to get his p4p title is beat de la hoya which mayweather did to a much bigger and one year younger de la hoya? so why shouldn't he be placed back to number 1? i'm not arguing cuz i'm not even a mayweather fan but i'm just trying to make a point.. so what u think about that?
Pac was #1 p4p way before his win over DLH. PBF passed that moniker on to Pac when he quit. And at this point, Pac's takin on all comers>PBF's dodgin WW challengers and he likely woulda surpassed him anyway.
well no one ever beat mayweather and the only thing that manny did to get his p4p title is beat de la hoya which mayweather did to a much bigger and one year younger de la hoya? so why shouldn't he be placed back to number 1? i'm not arguing cuz i'm not even a mayweather fan but i'm just trying to make a point.. so what u think about that?
pac was #1 p4p before he koed delahoya... and and mayweather shouldnt even be ranked because he retired from the sport. maybe you can rank his legacy to all the other retired boxers.
Why the hell would anything change unless Pac gets beat?
well no one ever beat mayweather and the only thing that manny did to get his p4p title is beat de la hoya which mayweather did to a much bigger and one year younger de la hoya? so why shouldn't he be placed back to number 1? i'm not arguing cuz i'm not even a mayweather fan but i'm just trying to make a point.. so what u think about that?