Can I just say;what the hell is the point in fans,experts,analysts,the average guy in the street,picking one fighter to beat another. Its all crap.Nearly all of you guys picked De La Hoya to beat Pacman,and the half that didnt I bet picked Pavlik to beat Hopkins.
And whats funny,is that you guys think you can pick one guy to beat another guy in a different era lolol. Hell if you cant get jackshit right on two guys in the same era,how the hell do you get the notion that you can compare two guys from different decades. I just got two words
GIVE UP !
Its not that boxing fans know nothing. Its that we don't know exactly how the Boxer is feeling the day of the fight. We don't know if they over trained or if they feel weak. WE as fans can only make educated guesses based on previous fights and what we know
Can I just say;what the hell is the point in fans,experts,analysts,the average guy in the street,picking one fighter to beat another. Its all crap.Nearly all of you guys picked De La Hoya to beat Pacman,and the half that didnt I bet picked Pavlik to beat Hopkins.
And whats funny,is that you guys think you can pick one guy to beat another guy in a different era lolol. Hell if you cant get jackshit right on two guys in the same era,how the hell do you get the notion that you can compare two guys from different decades. I just got two words
GIVE UP !
So why would you even post? You should go hang around some places that are frequented by people that offer you some kind of mental stimulation. Try the Screen Actors Guild forums or somethin'. You'd probably fit right in...:greddy2:
Translation = I don't know shit myself, so I listened to everyone else, now I owe my neighbor a blowjob every weekend for a year.
LOL. Awesome.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
Can I just say;what the hell is the point in fans,experts,analysts,the average guy in the street,picking one fighter to beat another. Its all crap.Nearly all of you guys picked De La Hoya to beat Pacman,and the half that didnt I bet picked Pavlik to beat Hopkins.
And whats funny,is that you guys think you can pick one guy to beat another guy in a different era lolol. Hell if you cant get jackshit right on two guys in the same era,how the hell do you get the notion that you can compare two guys from different decades. I just got two words
GIVE UP !
No man, it's fun.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
I don't mind predictions, just people who say "this fight shunt happen cos itz obvious would beat ". Some dopey twats would rather just talk the fight on a message board than see it!
Can I just say;what the hell is the point in fans,experts,analysts,the average guy in the street,picking one fighter to beat another. Its all crap.Nearly all of you guys picked De La Hoya to beat Pacman,and the half that didnt I bet picked Pavlik to beat Hopkins.
And whats funny,is that you guys think you can pick one guy to beat another guy in a different era lolol. Hell if you cant get jackshit right on two guys in the same era,how the hell do you get the notion that you can compare two guys from different decades. I just got two words
GIVE UP !
Translation = I don't know shit myself, so I listened to everyone else, now I owe my neighbor a blowjob every weekend for a year.
The fun of predicting boxing is the unpredictability of it all. It's that kind of sport.
If everyone knew every answer, where is the fun in that?
I like to be surprised and even wrong.
Makes it interesting.
yeah this guy is a buzzkill
The fun of predicting boxing is the unpredictability of it all. It's that kind of sport.
If everyone knew every answer, where is the fun in that?
I like to be surprised and even wrong.
Makes it interesting.
Good post. I hated Pac-DLH cuz the outcome was a foregone conclusion and kind of an unfair one. But pac proved me and mad other cats wrong, and put on a helluva show doin it.
And whats funny,is that you guys think you can pick one guy to beat another guy in a different era lolol. Hell if you cant get jackshit right on two guys in the same era,how the hell do you get the notion that you can compare two guys from different decades. I just got two words
GIVE UP !
LOL. That's pretty funny. Karma for that.
i think size advantage is really overrated sometimes. speed and skill kills.
i actually thought manny was going to win the fight by potshotting de la hoya because i thought de la hoya looked slow and past it against forbes but i didnt think hed embarrass oscar worse than he did david freakin diaz
Yeh its fun i guess,but also an exercise in futility. I mean if these guys had never fought then history would have said that De La Hoya would have won anyway. The same way that the consensus is that Mayweather wouldn't beat Duran at 130,or Tyson wouldn't have a hope in hell at a prime Ali. I mean in boxing,opinion seems to be regarded as fact.
I remember when Lacy and Calzaghe fought..Lacy was a strong favourite. Lol what a bleeding joke. If that fight had been cancelled,then history would have noted that Calzaghe was an inferior fighter to him.
I'm just miffed at how fans can get it so very very wrong on so many many occasions.
A phrase I constantly hear is how "styles make fights".Well going by the amount of innacurate selections pre fight,I wonder if a fighters style gives any clue at all to the boxing fan on the potential outcome,or is it an irrelevance.