Just the fact you still see threads on hamed years after he last fought tells you something doesnt it? Naz had a crossover appeal whearas Hatton appeals to working class white people.
Hamed for his cockness and exciting knockout style, and Ricky for his huge popularity and his inside fighting style. But Ricky has been in a bigger fight than Naz (Mayweather) and was more popular than Naz so for me anyway its Hatton.
lmao silly question,
hamed cudnt get as many people to his fights as hatton gets in his WEIGH INS !!
HAMED LONG GONE AND FORGOTTEN ABOUT, BUT RICKY HAS MILLIONS OF FANS AND ISNT AN AROGNAT COCKY TWAT SO I THINK THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTIONi don't know so much ,he used to get his fare share coming to see him fight/lose lol ,Hamed earned a fare bit of dough himself as well £40 million ain't bad for a featherweight!
Adidas paid him £6 million for 3 years !
Hatton I suppose.
£4 million to fight Malignaggi apparently. Christy.
He's the first real big heavy hitter interms of earnings outside Len, and man this is prizefighting.
,
lmao silly question,
hamed cudnt get as many people to his fights as hatton gets in his WEIGH INS !!
HAMED LONG GONE AND FORGOTTEN ABOUT, BUT RICKY HAS MILLIONS OF FANS AND ISNT AN AROGNAT COCKY TWAT SO I THINK THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION
Both of them TBH, don't see how either can be forgotten. Hamed will be remebered more for his loss against Barrera tho and Hatton unless he can improve dramtically will be rembered for his loss against Mayweather and win against Tszyu.