Bernard Hopkins vs Arthur Abraham at 168 right now! Who wins?

I'm still shocked Taylor beat Hopkins with his poor footwork? How the **** did he manage that? I think old Hopkins is much better at 170+ than Old Hopkins at 160. Or a hopkins with roach in his corner doesnt throw anything. calzaghe sucks.

it would be a terrible style match-up and probably the most boring fight ever . . . with that said bhop, if should be busier and has the boxing skills to avoids big shots from aa.

I like Abraham and I'm german, but B-Hop outpoints him easily.

I'm still shocked Taylor beat Hopkins with his poor footwork? How the **** did he manage that? I think old Hopkins is much better at 170+ than Old Hopkins at 160.

I can understand the wide points advantage for Hopkins. Hopkins definately outpoints him proberbly wide, He isn't stopping him, Abraham has never been down, he fought 7-6 rounds with a broken jaw and he's got a great defense. :lol1: I forgot about that......ok I'll buy the Hopkins by UD. You should be salesman :lol1:

I think Abraham would pull out a close decision at middleweight. If they were to fight at a higher weight then I would favor Hopkins.

B-Hop wins this easy.......11-1 on the cards or by late stoppage. I can understand the wide points advantage for Hopkins. Hopkins definately outpoints him proberbly wide, He isn't stopping him, Abraham has never been down, he fought 7-6 rounds with a broken jaw and he's got a great defense.

bhop knows how to land body shots and block what ever is coming back at him. And AA is no JC, he isn't constant at all.

B-Hop wins this easy.......11-1 on the cards or by late stoppage.