What you all think about Floyd's comments tonight that Bad Chad is the top dog right now. Floyd said it, Dawson is the best fighter out there. He also said he is still happily retired. What you all think?
You don't have to be a Hopkins fan or a Joe hater to think that win was controversial.
Joe didn't land squat.
All he did was flail like a drowning Spider monkey.
joe didn't land squat but bernard never knew where his corner was he was complaining to the ref and he had to take a 5 minute break because joe wasn't doing anything
the hopkins-calzaghe fight was a lot more controversial and calzaghe is still at number 2(somehow)
it's only controversial to hopkin fans or calzaghe haters, what happened to everyone that said joe beat an old man even though joe himself is about 37. how old is dawson? is he not in his 20's and tarver in his 40's
But I'd bet Chad KO's the Hopkins that Joe "fought".
He'd brutalize Joe for sure.
His bodypunches would have the Welsh Rabbit folded like a lawn chair.
when was the last time you saw Chad "brutalize" anyone? hell, when was the first?
You're quick to suck Calzhage's shit encrusted dick for "beating" the 43 y/o ghost of Hopkins.
Put Joe in there with Tarver and he'd still be unconscious.
Lets not forget that a 42yr old Hopkins beat Tarver and didnt lose one round, scored a KD as well. One of Tarvers eyes was closed after that fight.
and Also stopped a prime GJ...
What you all think about Floyd's comments tonight that Bad Chad is the top dog right now. Floyd said it, Dawson is the best fighter out there. He also said he is still happily retired. What you all think?
Chad is def a good fighter. I wouldnt call him the p4p best. That statement holds no water...He isnt even the best light heavy ( or hasnt proved it yet)
Lets not forget that a 42yr old Hopkins beat Tarver and didnt lose one round, scored a KD as well. One of Tarvers eyes was closed after that fight.
The kid's got skills, they need to be further proven though. Perhaps a drop to 168. Or impressive wins over Jones and or Calzaghe at 175, by impressive I mean KOs. A win over Pavlik would do it.
he is not moving down, he wants ppl to come up to 175. he says in 3 videos of thread i made
dawson at # 1? wow...i didnt know that all it took was victories over Johnson and Tarver to get that spot
The kid's got skills, they need to be further proven though. Perhaps a drop to 168. Or impressive wins over Jones and or Calzaghe at 175, by impressive I mean KOs. A win over Pavlik would do it.
I couldnt be happier that dawson beat that chump tarver!!! But i think he has to do a little bit more b4 he becomes a top 10 p4p fighter!!! That said i think he has all the skills to become the best!!!
Mayweather is from a group of boxing thugs who want to see other thugs succeed. See: Zab Judah, Benard Hopkins ,James Toney. It's just matter of time before this Dawson character slips up.:no:..............
I think Mayweather just said it to be controversial. Pacquiao is clearly the best fighter P4P, but if Mayweather acknowledges that, the next question will be why aren't you fighting Manny Pacquiao?
Can you (should you) be the #1 p4p if you can't beat Oscar Delahoya?
Previous p4p guys who beat Oscar include Shane, Hopkins, Floyd (and Pernell).
I think overcoming such odds is worthy enough to be #1...on top of a winning streak vs. the elite.
Can you (should you) be the #1 p4p if you can't beat Oscar Delahoya?
Previous p4p guys who beat Oscar include Shane, Hopkins, Floyd (and Pernell).
Pac will lose to Oscar for reasons inherently irrelevant to p4p criteria.
Floyd probly knows what he seen from Dawson as far as talent goes. I guess Floyd changed his mind on Pacquiao being #1. He knows he's not beating Oscar.
Its funny cause if Tarver was so shot why did you pick him to beat Dawson? Dawson whipped him so now he's "shot".
LOL
tarver didnt look shot to me though..he looked out of place..it really should have been a chess match in the middle of the ring..i dont know why tarver was walking chad down...
mayweather is a moron
beating a 40 year old shot Tarver dosent make you a top 10 p4p fighter
Its funny cause if Tarver was so shot why did you pick him to beat Dawson? Dawson whipped him so now he's "shot".
Goes against? I'm a fan of Dawson but he's not a Top 10 P4P yet..
He has 1 good win against Tarver but he struggled against Johnson.. I wouldn't rate him top 10 just yet.
You rate him top 10 because you're a fan of his.
yet you rate Paul Williams as top 10? ****outtahere you dumb faqqot. people only engage you because ****in with kids with down syndrome is fun.
clearly top ten. he always looks remarkable. his chin is improving. he took some good lefts against t-bag. he showed grit in fighting through being hurt against glen johnson in addition to amazing boxing skill and natural talent. those combos last night would be impressive on a bag much less against a world-class champion. i've never seen tarver look so helpless with his gloves up. with a couple more high caliber wins he could take #1 within a year or two....
I hear ya, his talent was very impressive last night. He only seems to be lacking a little more punching power and attitude. He's very soft spoken, which is no fault but it could hurt his marketability.