Calzaghe is criticised for fighting Jones but.........

Pavlik had to fight locket if he didnt want to lose his belts. Joe definately doesnt have to fight jones

This is getting comical, Calzaghe was "non stop aggression" in the Hopkins fight? When? Maybe at the Press Conf. - one that Hopkins wasn't at in person - because it sure as hell wasn't in the ring. Cazlaghe is a joke who has fought a total of 3 decent opponants in his entire career - can you say "protected"?! If Joe EVER wanted RJJ in his prime, he would have flew across the pond and fought the Champ - but he didn't - why? Because he knew he would get embarrassed, hell, he may get embarrassed by Jones even now. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck - it's a DUCK - and CALZAGHE DUCKED PAVLIK, and it doesn't matter what any of you nuthuggers say because you are only fooling yourself as usual. I recall all you UK nuthuggers saying Hatton would KILL Mayweather too, I'll bet you still haven't quit crying over that one.:owned: pavlik had three tough fights back to back, lockett was the mandatory and kelly deserves an easy fight after what he's he's done. old RJJ won't be an easy fight for joe, roy has diminished skills but he's still fucking fast, faster than calzaghe. if roy doesn't throw 1 punch per round like ber-nard hopkins joe is in for a very tough fight. RJJ might still have what it takes to beat the slapper, i think he does

hey man calzage has fought alot of guys i never heard of either. and anyway i think pavlik is a very exciting fighter so even against a bum he is giving the fans a knockout because he has no regard for human life. Lol, I laughed. I don't think Kelly is that heartless.

You mean he destroyed the #1 mandatory. get joe's nuts outta your mouth boy and read the truth!

Lolz Dat Bitch Calzslappy Will Get Pwned Wen He Fites Sum1 Lyk Pavlicke, Calzslappy Is Nothink Cumpared 2 The Mity Miranda Clearly, you've ran out of material. Fail.

I bet your a member of the calzaghe nuthugging clan arent you? funny thing is you still dont answer my question, Calzaghe in 14 years of his boxing career has faced only three names from which two were past their prime, both gave him tough fights. He made title defenses against around 12-14 bums padding his record yet you guys talk shit about Pavlik who has been a pro in less time than Calzaghe yet beat Miranda, Taylor, Taylor II. In short time he is already considered the undisputed undefeated middleweight champion of the world who is in the P4P List as well, it took Calzaghe 14 years to get status and defending against cab drivers at home. The thing that gets to me is the pathetic double standards, talking about Pavlik defending against a nobody when Joe is known for doing that for most of his career. Out of 20+ title defenses people probably know about 2 of them. 12-14? Name them. The fact that you know fuck all about fuck all is irrelevant - Calzaghe has fought countless world champions and is currently the #1 at SMW and LHW. What idiots have Moby in their P4P list then? Do you have their addresses so I can send round the men in white coats? Pavlik is where Calzaghe was 10 years ago but not as good. It's good for him that this fight isn't happening as he'd just end up flipping burgers like Lacy.

There's a large Calzaghe hater contingent (most are trolls though) here that will criticize Joe no matter what he does and always make an excuse after every win even thought they pick every fighter to beat him. I like Pavlik and think he's got a bright future and I think Joe will fight him and Jones before he retires. I think so too.

who talked about hopkins :ugh: the discussion is about a calzaghe stan critising pavlik for defending his title against lockett when calzaghe has been doing that for 90% of his career. 14 years to get where he is right now....LMFAO - go and defend this if you like, it will make you look like a bitch. Because in your mind Hopkins is a legend, while fighting most of the same types of opponents as Calzaghe. And to say that Joe has fought Locketts 90% of his career is about as asinine as most of the garbage you post.

who Talked About Hopkins :ugh: The Discussion Is About A Calzaghe Stan Critising Pavlik For Defending His Title Against Lockett When Calzaghe Has Been Doing That For 90% Of His Career. 14 Years To Get Where He Is Right Now....lmfao - Go And Defend This If You Like, It Will Make You Look Like A Bitch. Lolz Dat Bitch Calzslappy Will Get Pwned Wen He Fites Sum1 Lyk Pavlicke, Calzslappy Is Nothink Cumpared 2 The Mity Miranda

The funny thing is you talk shit about Lockett but you being a calzaghe nuthugger dont admit how Joe has faced bums in most of his career while padding his record, i mean pavlik made a title defense against lockett, but calzaghe has made title defenses against Ashira, Sobot, Ferreyra, Thornberry, Starie, McIntyre, Jiminez and god knows how many more bums. Recognize these gems? Steve Frank William Bo James Andrew Council Simon Brown Syd Vanderpool These are some of the gems Hopkins defended his paper title with. His vacant belt that he beat Segundo Mercado (???????????) to win.

The funny thing is you talk shit about Lockett but you being a calzaghe nuthugger dont admit how Joe has faced bums in most of his career while padding his record, i mean pavlik made a title defense against lockett, but calzaghe has made title defenses against Ashira, Sobot, Ferreyra, Thornberry, Starie, McIntyre, Jiminez and god knows how many more bums. I bet you have Boxrec set as your homepage, don't you.

This is getting comical, Calzaghe was "non stop aggression" in the Hopkins fight? When? Maybe at the Press Conf. - one that Hopkins wasn't at in person - because it sure as hell wasn't in the ring. Cazlaghe is a joke who has fought a total of 3 decent opponants in his entire career - can you say "protected"?! If Joe EVER wanted RJJ in his prime, he would have flew across the pond and fought the Champ - but he didn't - why? Because he knew he would get embarrassed, hell, he may get embarrassed by Jones even now. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck - it's a DUCK - and CALZAGHE DUCKED PAVLIK, and it doesn't matter what any of you nuthuggers say because you are only fooling yourself as usual. I recall all you UK nuthuggers saying Hatton would KILL Mayweather too, I'll bet you still haven't quit crying over that one.:owned:

This was because Joe's punk ass WOULDNT fight in America. Roy was the champ, why does he need to follow the challenger? Fuck that slappin ass bitch. And Bernard exposed Cals. Cals fought B Hops fights and B Hop countered him to death. CalsSlappy slapped all fuckin night. Look at your top 3, it is CLEAR that you are a NUT HUGGER. Calzaghe owned Hopkins during the second half of the fight and made him pretend to get hit with a low blow to get a break from Joe's non-stop aggression and most likely having to quit. If running, holding, faking getting hit low and being out punched and landed at a 2 to 1 rate is "B Hops" fight, then yeah Joe fought it.

Joe is fuckin wack!!! why didnt he fight Roy when Roy was in his prime, or even B Hop in his prime. He waits until they are over the hill and a sheel of their former selves, then he wants to fight him, and get the recognition as if they were in their prime. Joe beating B Hop (which he really lost) and maybe beating a Roy of now, is a crock of shit. In his prime Roy Ko in 5. Now MAYBE Roy by DC. And what you say doesnt mean shit. Look mat your Fav. fighters. You like Enzo? It just proves you are a Euro nut hugger. Neither Jones or Hopkins wanted any part of Joe several years ago. Jones admitted to Brian Kenny on FNF last year that he didn't want to risk fighting JC or DM when both were legitimate opponents for him at his peak because there was too much risk and little reward back then. When Brian then asked Jones what's changed that he's willing to fight Joe now, Jones said, "I have nothing to lose." And NO, Joe didn't "really lose" to Hopkins unless you're completely biased in scoring the fight. That was a clear victory for Joe.

Gary Lockett > Roy Jones Jr. and you can quote that shit

I'm pretty sure Lockett was his mandatory. Besides, before that he fought Miranda, Taylor, Taylor. Those are three tough fights. Say what you want about Miranda, but he is very dangerous, and Taylor was the proven MW champion. When has Calzaghe fought three consecutive fights like that? Pavlik is not the type to duck anyone. He will fight the best competition, and I don't think we have worry about him not. I'm not trying to take anything away from Calzaghe. I think he is a very good fighter, and I think that he can beat Pavlik (although I wouldn't be surprised if Pavlik pulled it off), but I wouldn't worry about Pavlik not fighting good competition because he will.

Kelly Pavlik makes an absolutely disgraceful defence against a bum like a Lockett and it gets completely over-looked by the retarded yanks on this board. Let's look at Lockett's last three opponents prior to Pavlik: Kai Kauramaki 13-13-0 Lee Blundell 23-4-2 Ayitty Powers 11-4-1 How on earth can Pavlik's fans or management argue that the fight should've taken place? There's a large Calzaghe hater contingent (most are trolls though) here that will criticize Joe no matter what he does and always make an excuse after every win even thought they pick every fighter to beat him. I like Pavlik and think he's got a bright future and I think Joe will fight him and Jones before he retires.

Kelly Pavlik makes an absolutely disgraceful defence against a bum like a Lockett and it gets completely over-looked by the retarded yanks on this board. Let's look at Lockett's last three opponents prior to Pavlik: Kai Kauramaki 13-13-0 Lee Blundell 23-4-2 Ayitty Powers 11-4-1 How on earth can Pavlik's fans or management argue that the fight should've taken place? People have been banned for less, you green tooth, euro trash bum. <3

i didnt know Lockett was Pavlik's last fight?! shit, i need to catch up on some Pavlik then.