i dont understand why haters want to hate on Floyd's resume. those are ALL great wins against the BEST. they were the best fight that could be made as far as quality at the time Floyd fought them. some may have looked overmatched but, that is not Floyd's fault. how can it be his fault that the best fighter that he could fight at that moment didn't even match up to him therefore making them look like amateurs? yall need to wake up and see the greatness that is Floyd. yall can hate all you want but, Floyd will go down as the best fighter that ever did it. just because there are a whole bunch of whiney cotto and margarito nuthuggers on this site doesnt mean the world see it the way you do.
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2007/writers/richard_hoffer/05/01/big.fight.prev0507/p1_mayweather.jpg
Baldomir is a certified future hall of famer. who could have beaten him at the time besides floyd? he was the best welterweight alive. only reason he went south and lost to Forrest was because of the damage Floyd caused him.
Im not sure i believe that Baldomir is a certified future hall of famer. You should have added Coralles and Castillo to that list too.
i dont understand why haters want to hate on Floyd's resume. those are ALL great wins against the BEST. they were the best fight that could be made as far as quality at the time Floyd fought them. some may have looked overmatched but, that is not Floyd's fault. how can it be his fault that the best fighter that he could fight at that moment didn't even match up to him therefore making them look like amateurs? yall need to wake up and see the greatness that is Floyd. yall can hate all you want but, Floyd will go down as the best fighter that ever did it. just because there are a whole bunch of whiney cotto and margarito nuthuggers on this site doesnt mean the world see it the way you do.
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2007/writers/richard_hoffer/05/01/big.fight.prev0507/p1_mayweather.jpg
Just because Mayweather has unreasonable detractors and haters, it doesn't mean you have to unreasonably defend him.
shut up man...ur acting like a real nuthugger foreal....I bet this is Leonard Ellorbe, Floyds advisor lmao....seriously Mosley isn't washed up..he had like a 5 fight winning streak against REAL fighters and performed well Oscar is a celebrity boxer he fights with no hunger in him at all...I doubt Floyd can beat the De La Hoya from the 90's.....
Gatti - shot fighter, punching bag
Baldomir - journeyman with 11 losses, no power
Mitchell - WHO?
De La Hoya - past his prime, drag queen promoter
Judah - chicken dancing joke coming off a loss to the journeyman Baldomir.
Hatton - overrated, undersized alcoholic
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
Mitchell? The ONLY reason Mitchell is even CLOSE to being mentioned is because Manny Steward said he would beat Floyd after the Corley bout.
aight boxing experts. why would the most respected magazine in boxing, ALL boxing writers and analyst and TRUE boxing fans have Money at #1 if those werent the best boxers at the time Money man DESTROYED them? huh? answer that haters. anytime a blackman is considered the best, haters always try to find a way to discredit.
The fact that you have Mitchell and Baldomir on there as great wins means you know absolutely nothing about boxing. Perpetrating the knowledgable boxing fan, as it were.
I don't know why you list Baldomir as a bad win. It certainly isn't "WOW!!", but Baldomir was the most accomplished fighter in the division. He had wins over Zab and Gatti (far more better then Cintron and Clottey, well Zab is better then any of them and technically Baldomir beat Clottey too).
It was either him of Spinks...I'd rather see Mayweather beat Baldomir then beat Spinks anyday....
Gatti - shot fighter, punching bag
Baldomir - journeyman with 11 losses, no power
Mitchell - WHO?
De La Hoya - past his prime, drag queen promoter
Judah - chicken dancing joke coming off a loss to the journeyman Baldomir.
Hatton - overrated, undersized alcoholic
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
The fact that you have Mitchell and Baldomir on there as great wins means you know absolutely nothing about boxing. Perpetrating the knowledgable boxing fan, as it were.
Well I'd say Gatti and Baldomir were good win. Mitchell really wasn't, but it's ok as it was a tune up for Judah.
Baldomir is a certified future hall of famer. who could have beaten him at the time besides floyd? he was the best welterweight alive. only reason he went south and lost to Forrest was because of the damage Floyd caused him.