Whose "Fouling Techniques" annoy you the most?!

I cant stand what excessive clinching does to the excitement of a fight. So I voted that. But I mean if you mean the most costly, most dangerous, etc. then yeah Peter is it.

Rabbit punching is cruel. Coming in with your head is just straight on, but Rabbit punching on the back of the head sucks.

Mayweather Is A Blatant Fouler And Has Slid By For Far Too Long. Some Of The Elbows And Forearms He "uses" Throughout A Fight A Pretty Damaging.

I dont think Sam Peters is as bad as people make it out to be... hes not aiming for the back of the head, but a lot of his opponents will lean forward or turn when he punches, like james toney for instance, and its actually the opponent that causes themselves to get hit to the back of the head... If someone is punching you, and you turn or, make a lateral movement and the punch catches part of your head, thats not Sams fault I dont believe. Manny Stewart said the same thing after Jim Lampley addressed the rabbid punches, by saying exactly what I described Saturday Night. if that was the case,,,why arent these guys getting hit in the back of the head by anyone else? its always sam peter for a reason

Well it certainly seems to me like Peter doesn't give a f*** where he lands the punch as long as it does damage. Even if the opponent is already down. Same with Andrew Golota's low blows. It's illegal and dangerous, the uppercut should be used when the opponent is ducking down with his head.

I dont think Sam Peters is as bad as people make it out to be... hes not aiming for the back of the head, but a lot of his opponents will lean forward or turn when he punches, like james toney for instance, and its actually the opponent that causes themselves to get hit to the back of the head... If someone is punching you, and you turn or, make a lateral movement and the punch catches part of your head, thats not Sams fault I dont believe. Manny Stewart said the same thing after Jim Lampley addressed the rabbid punches, by saying exactly what I described Saturday Night.

Sam Peter for rabbit-punching/hitting when his opponents are down. He should learn how to use the uppercut so he won't have to rabbit punch people who are ducking. Otherwise he will eventually be DQ'd by a strict referee. 3:18 3:35 1:55 0:15 When Peter finally uses the uppercut it's an illegal one. Peter vs Maskaev 0:55

What bothers me is fans who are quick to call someone else a cheater for fouls, yet when their favorite fighters do it, they say "well its a fight, u do what u have to do to win"

I dislike the rabbit punch because it can really jar a guys brain..But the headbutts by b-hop are annoying. there is no doubting that he is very dirty

Fully agreed. But keep in mind that many of the kids who say that shit don't know what are fouls and what aren't. Some of the Floyd fans tried to say ducking below the waist is "slipping punches." Floyd is the dirtiest fighter on that list, btw. I'm not saying that's a bad thing Well Bernards Headbutt is almost EVERY time he throws a right hand, and almost every time he comes in he lowers his head. Floyd doesnt always use that elbow, occassionaly he arcs it a little too much, and he has been warned for it. The skull to the face maneuver is terrible to watch, I hate it.

I dont think Sam Peters is as bad as people make it out to be... hes not aiming for the back of the head, but a lot of his opponents will lean forward or turn when he punches, like james toney for instance, and its actually the opponent that causes themselves to get hit to the back of the head... If someone is punching you, and you turn or, make a lateral movement and the punch catches part of your head, thats not Sams fault I dont believe. Manny Stewart said the same thing after Jim Lampley addressed the rabbid punches, by saying exactly what I described Saturday Night.

I'm not that bothered by fouls to be honest. What does bother me is that holding, rough-housing and rabbit punches by one fighter is unconscionable cheating (Ricky Hatton, Sam Peter) but is "mad skillz" by another fighter (Hopkins, Mayweather).

definatly hopkins....... but historically is julio cesar "50 rabbit punhces a round" vazquez...

Mayweather beacuse of the bullshit be pulled during the hatton fight, really pissed me off. Then probally bhop just because hes a sneaky little bastard, and tito because of the low blows AND the frigen plaster of paris wraps his father puts on under his gloves lol.

Hopkins head, because it does this. http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/6576/60034038bx6.jpg Damn, does Winky have some nice teeth thought. Jesus that cut looks nasty in that pic.

Hopkins head, because it does this. http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/6576/60034038bx6.jpg Damn, does Winky have some nice teeth thought. Agreed but cuts heal, punching to the back of the head is brain damage material... and Sam Peter never gets warned either. He should be outright disqualified for it in my opinion.

Every time I purchase a PPV with Hopkins, I am extremely nervous that the fight will end up as a DQ NC or TD from a Headbutt.

Hopkins head, because it does this. http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/6576/60034038bx6.jpg Damn, does Winky have some nice teeth thought. Surprising, given the fact that he eats those donuts all the time...

Hopkins head, because it does this. http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/6576/60034038bx6.jpg Damn, does Winky have some nice teeth thought.

Titos low blows. Saved him from being KOd by Vargas. But he did what he had to do to win.