titles can set up big money fights. Title first, then the money
Yeah, I think they go hand in hand. Tough to get a huge payday if you've never won a title. But in the beginning I think money is usually the big focus, unless they're rich to start with.
First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women.
In professional boxing, do boxers fight for the $$$ or for the titles?
It's all about the money. Especially if you have kids or other dependants. You can never have enough money when you have children.
I been wondering the same thing. I remember Oscar and Tyson (I use them because they are the biggest money makers in the last two decades) fighting often and not every fight being a huge event. Oscar had Patrick Charpentier and Darryl Tyson among others. Tyson had Tony Tubbs and even Buster Douglas who was a 42-1 underdog and everybody said the fight was going to be a joke. The point is they were active. Now you got somebody like Floyd who only wants to fight strictly for $$$. I'm not a Floyd fan, but I wouldn't mind watching him fight more often. It was the same with Pernell Whitaker. I didn't like him but I would always tune in when he fought. That's why I don't mind Cotto-Gomez or DLH-Forbes, at least they're fighting. I guess some fighters heads get too big and they only care about $$$. Who cares about the fans right?
Do I work at the bank because I love my job title, or do I work at the bank because I love my paycheck?
It's the same for every profession.
I don't think so athletes love what they do and it just happens that they get paid for it.
In professional boxing, do boxers fight for the $$$ or for the titles?
Do I work at the bank because I love my job title, or do I work at the bank because I love my paycheck?
It's the same for every profession.