just watched hopkins/dlh.... who do u think was better?

I think Oscar landed better shots against Floyd and was more effective. I had it 6-2 for Hopkins at the end of the fight, but watching it again it'd probably be more so 5-3, there was really close round in there (3?) that I could have given to either guy. It's hard to say really.

i think the middleweight oscar that fought hopkins in 2004-09-18, was better. he was on his toes, jabbing circles pretty good.Well, he was fighting a totally different challenge, so it's hard to determine. The Oscar of that time was better though, despite not looking it because he was fighting at MW.

:ugh: you know what i mean. Oscar looked better against Floyd because he lost a split decision, he was knocked out by Hopkins so how did he look better in that fight? its obvious. that too complicated? well, let's put it this way: pound for pound, ignoring the middleweight/light-middleweight difference, and ignoring the result of the hopkins and mayweather fights: which oscar would have had a better chance at beating floyd? 1. the 2004 oscar that fought bhop 2. the may 2007 oscar that lost to mayweather via split decision. i dont know, it just seemed to me that the 154 may 2007 oscar seemed flatfooted, compared to the 160 2004 oscar.

It might be "obvious" if Hopkins = Mayweather, which is just silly. How can this decide it? Of course he got a better result against Floyd, but in one case he was fighting the middleweight champ, in the other he was fighting a guy who came into the ring at 149 or whatever id rather lose a split decision than be knocked out.

It might be "obvious" if Hopkins = Mayweather, which is just silly. :ugh: you know what i mean. Oscar looked better against Floyd because he lost a split decision, he was knocked out by Hopkins so how did he look better in that fight? its obvious. that too complicated?

Oscar that fought Hopkins= Knocked out Oscar that fought Floyd= lost a spilt decision its obvious How can this decide it? Of course he got a better result against Floyd, but in one case he was fighting the middleweight champ, in the other he was fighting a guy who came into the ring at 149 or whatever

Oscar that fought Hopkins= Knocked out Oscar that fought Floyd= lost a spilt decision its obvious It might be "obvious" if Hopkins = Mayweather, which is just silly.

I thought Oscar was even in the fight with Hopkins at the time of stoppage. I had it 4 rounds a piece so Oscar was holding his own against B-Hop until he took a dive, probably to be able to make the tranny convention on time.

Oscar that fought Hopkins= Knocked out Oscar that fought Floyd= lost a spilt decision its obvious

She sure is

Milly is hot

Milly is hot.

Milly is hot...

i think the middleweight oscar that fought hopkins in 2004-09-18, was better. he was on his toes, jabbing circles pretty good. Uhhh... I think Hopkins won the fight, so I'll probably go with Hopkins. EDIT: Lol, thanks for adding a poll to clear up what your opening post meant after I posted something that didn't make any sense. He looked good against Hopkins IMO. I'll vote for that.