who beat Juarez more convincingly, Barrera or Marquez?

But Pacquiao and Marquez have unfinished business. It's a rematch that people want to see. And the only fight between those first four names that even came close to being disappointing was the rematch between Pacquiao and Barrera, which was decent despite its being a tactical bout. seriously, that Draw they had back then, needs to be settled NOW!

so marquez it is. i gotta see this fight

I'M TIRED of the same guys fighting each other over and over again..marquez pacquiao barrera morales blah blah blah, fight somebody else so you can lose, fight guzman, or freitas or diaz But Pacquiao and Marquez have unfinished business. It's a rematch that people want to see. And the only fight between those first four names that even came close to being disappointing was the rematch between Pacquiao and Barrera, which was decent despite its being a tactical bout.

who beat Juarez more convincingly, Barrera or Marquez? i haven't seen the marquez/juarez fight yet, but to those who did, what's your answer? But to actually answer the question while furthering my original point, Barrera in the rematch used his footwork, distance and good jabs and combinations to keep Juarez at bay. Marquez also used jabs and combinations, but he did it from a closer distance. Marquez took advantage of the cut opened up by a head butt in the first round, keeping the blood flowing.

I'M TIRED of the same guys fighting each other over and over again..marquez pacquiao barrera morales blah blah blah, fight somebody else so you can lose, fight guzman, or freitas or diaz

i also see rainbow colors!! You also live in San Francisco, watch Ellen, listen to Melissa Etheridge and pine for George Michael in a public bathroom.

Marquez lit his ass up.

i also see rainbow colors!!

Two different styles. Barrera out-boxed Juarez in the rematch. Marquez, looking to sell a future bout with Pacquiao, was a boxer-puncher. I don't understand why there's so much black and white in forums. Shades of gray exist, too.