After Floyd beats Hatton, who's the next hope?

Speaking of taking it like a man, where's that idiot Toney Booth? He's the one that was saying Floyd would have black blood running out of his ears after the Hatton fight. Where is Wiley Hyena who had Hatton atop his p4p list BEFORE the Dec. 8th bout.

Man, I'm telling you, it's a reoccurring pattern and I never expected it to stop.. Not now. And yes, Sir. Easton will surely be missed. At least he isn't copping out by moving on to the next "hope", since his lost. He took it like a man.:) Speaking of taking it like a man, where's that idiot Toney Booth? He's the one that was saying Floyd would have black blood running out of his ears after the Hatton fight.

Damn Homie, you should be a fortune teller:lol1: :wave: You will be missed. :lol1: Man, I'm telling you, it's a reoccurring pattern and I never expected it to stop.. Not now. And yes, Sir. Easton will surely be missed. At least he isn't copping out by moving on to the next "hope", since his lost. He took it like a man.:)

It is painfully obvious the pattern that emerges with Floyd Mayweather jr. concerning his love/hate relationship with emotionally invested fans of the sport. We can go as far back as Gatti and trace the exact same sentiment and wishful thinking. Irrationality over takes the mind of those that want to see Floyd lose, to the point where folx were basically praying that he'd lose to Gatti and actually gave him (Gatti) a decent chance. We all know what happened. Skipping Sharmba, the same applies to Judah. People hated Floyd so much, that I remember comments stating that they actually hated both fighters, but to go with the lesser of the two evils, they picked Judah as their favorite to win. Of course Floyd shitted on him also, and Baldomir was the new hope. Floyd again fights Baldy, and wins an easy decision without a scratch on his face. De la Hoya turned into a nonsense race battle in some (not all) sectors, emotions were so high. People wanted so bad for the guy to lose, claiming also that De La Hoya was just too big, too strong, jab is too precise, too imposing, and too big of a star for Mayweather to overcome. Once more, the pretty boy comes out on top. So my question now is, since obviously the exact same pattern emerges with Ricky Hatton, when Floyd beats him decisively like most expect him to do, who's the next fighter that Floyd bashers are going to lean on? I'd just like to know now for future reference. Is it the Cotto/Mosley winner, is it Paul Williams or Cintron, is it Kelly Pavlik? Grasping at straws is so common with the anti-Floyd crusaders, that I just felt compelled to ask. Damn Homie, you should be a fortune teller:lol1: :lol1: Unfortunately for you Isis, there will be no need to find an opponent after dec 8th. After hatton crushes Floyd it's gonna be interesting to see just how fucking stupid you are gonna look trying to make excuses. I will be watching and laughing, of that you can be sure! :wave: You will be missed. :lol1:

lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :owned: :lol1:.. Poor Easton..

lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :owned: :lol1:.. Poor Easton..

Unfortunately for you Isis, there will be no need to find an opponent after dec 8th. After hatton crushes Floyd it's gonna be interesting to see just how fucking stupid you are gonna look trying to make excuses. I will be watching and laughing, of that you can be sure! lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :owned:

It is painfully obvious the pattern that emerges with Floyd Mayweather jr. concerning his love/hate relationship with emotionally invested fans of the sport. We can go as far back as Gatti and trace the exact same sentiment and wishful thinking. Irrationality over takes the mind of those that want to see Floyd lose, to the point where folx were basically praying that he'd lose to Gatti and actually gave him (Gatti) a decent chance. We all know what happened. Skipping Sharmba, the same applies to Judah. People hated Floyd so much, that I remember comments stating that they actually hated both fighters, but to go with the lesser of the two evils, they picked Judah as their favorite to win. Of course Floyd shitted on him also, and Baldomir was the new hope. Floyd again fights Baldy, and wins an easy decision without a scratch on his face. De la Hoya turned into a nonsense race battle in some (not all) sectors, emotions were so high. People wanted so bad for the guy to lose, claiming also that De La Hoya was just too big, too strong, jab is too precise, too imposing, and too big of a star for Mayweather to overcome. Once more, the pretty boy comes out on top. So my question now is, since obviously the exact same pattern emerges with Ricky Hatton, when Floyd beats him decisively like most expect him to do, who's the next fighter that Floyd bashers are going to lean on? I'd just like to know now for future reference. Is it the Cotto/Mosley winner, is it Paul Williams or Cintron, is it Kelly Pavlik? Grasping at straws is so common with the anti-Floyd crusaders, that I just felt compelled to ask. The next hope is obviously Cotto and I've predicted the aftermath well...:lol1:

It is painfully obvious the pattern that emerges with Floyd Mayweather jr. concerning his love/hate relationship with emotionally invested fans of the sport. We can go as far back as Gatti and trace the exact same sentiment and wishful thinking. Irrationality over takes the mind of those that want to see Floyd lose, to the point where folx were basically praying that he'd lose to Gatti and actually gave him (Gatti) a decent chance. We all know what happened. Skipping Sharmba, the same applies to Judah. People hated Floyd so much, that I remember comments stating that they actually hated both fighters, but to go with the lesser of the two evils, they picked Judah as their favorite to win. Of course Floyd shitted on him also, and Baldomir was the new hope. Floyd again fights Baldy, and wins an easy decision without a scratch on his face. De la Hoya turned into a nonsense race battle in some (not all) sectors, emotions were so high. People wanted so bad for the guy to lose, claiming also that De La Hoya was just too big, too strong, jab is too precise, too imposing, and too big of a star for Mayweather to overcome. Once more, the pretty boy comes out on top. So my question now is, since obviously the exact same pattern emerges with Ricky Hatton, when Floyd beats him decisively like most expect him to do, who's the next fighter that Floyd bashers are going to lean on? I'd just like to know now for future reference. Is it the Cotto/Mosley winner, is it Paul Williams or Cintron, is it Kelly Pavlik? Grasping at straws is so common with the anti-Floyd crusaders, that I just felt compelled to ask. When a guy is undefeated, its abvious such pattern will start following him. I'm sure hatton had his own naysayers.... (castillo, tsu), Calzaghe (Lacy, now Kesler), now pavlik (hopkins, Kesler, Calzaghe, even Taylor remach). However I give hatton a very slight chance of pulling it off 20/80.

Pacquiao was man enough to turn pro at 16, while Floyd hid in the Amateurs until 19 when he was fighting 125 and people mature at different ages, so what's your point. Pac is 2 inches shorter with a lot shorter reach and is just now making an impact at 130. Asking him to jump to 147 to fight Floyd would be like asking Floyd to fight Jermaine Taylor at 160, where Floyd would be humiliated. Starting your pro career at 16 doesn't make you a man, just an early bloomer. Him starting so prematurely is probably why he has 3 losses on his record (2 against nobodies) for him to be so "great". At the end of the day, Pac and Floyd shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath..

Pacquiao was man enough to turn pro at 16, while Floyd hid in the Amateurs until 19 when he was fighting 125 and people mature at different ages, so what's your point. Pac is 2 inches shorter with a lot shorter reach and is just now making an impact at 130. Asking him to jump to 147 to fight Floyd would be like asking Floyd to fight Jermaine Taylor at 160, where Floyd would be humiliated. Starting your pro career at 16 doesn't make you a man, just an early bloomer. Him starting so prematurely is probably why he has 3 losses on his record, for him to be so "great". At the end of the day, Pac and Floyd shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath..

HOW OLD was Pac when he "turned pro" at 106.?? And what weight was Floyd fighting at that same age? Figure it out, THEN come back, princess. Pacquiao was man enough to turn pro at 16, while Floyd hid in the Amateurs until 19 when he was fighting 125 and people mature at different ages, so what's your point. Pac is 2 inches shorter with a lot shorter reach and is just now making an impact at 130. Asking him to jump to 147 to fight Floyd would be like asking Floyd to fight Jermaine Taylor at 160, where Floyd would be humiliated.

Damn, I really wish you would "get it". You have some potential....but fall just a bit short. Shame. replies getting shorter and shorter eh? coz you just owned yourself and now you're trying to sneak out of it. created a trap which only you alone could fall into. but dont quit on me now, you can do it. stick to the plan. back to red bolded letters. you need it, and Dwiens would be disappointed.

malinagi would def beat mayweather on points what drugs you on tonight?

malinagi would def beat mayweather on points

The problem is, Mayweather won't fight just anybody! He wants big names that'll give him big money. Which as of lately has been meaning past-their-prime fighters. Unfortunately, because of his higher concern for money instead of his legacy, he avoids fighting the younger, fresher fighters that'll possibly give him more of a threat. It's good for his checkbook, but sucks for the fans! I'm just reposting this reply of mine from last night. I think this is the main problem to getting Floyd to fight anyone that MIGHT actually beat him.

If PBF goes to 140, the first order of business must be Witter and not Pac. Pac will continue to hide a couple of divisions below. Pac hiding a couple of divisions below, ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Pacquiao turned pro at 106, and has dominated from 106 all the way to 130 (a weight at which he would SMOKE Mayweather.)

Do you not see what Bringer (I think) and I were doing? We were exaggerating to tune up the Pacquiao nuts who were on the board. 1) Pacquiao IS fighting below where he should. That is certain. 2) Mayweather would demolish pac head-to-head and he would get no credit for it and it would prove nothing. That is certain. The ratings are as they should be. FMJ #1, Pac #2. Now, go back to your wrenches. now comes the explanations :ugh: but in those threads you were not saying so haha. at least Bringer would mention or show he's being sarcastic but you, you were serious in those threads so why backtrack now? and please, no need for those itemized explanations, they're not helping your case coz you're entirely missing the point. im having fun w/ you. here, i think you got several bolts loose on your head. good thing i have a wrench :D

I knew you would back down, PlumberBoy. You had to. And nobody said for pac to jump to Floyd immediately. In fact, i have said that pac needs to go to the REAL Diaz. The mayweather point was illustrative. But you are so busy playing amateur psychologist, that you can't see that. Hint: Psychologists actually have to go to school. In case you didn't know. uh-oh look who's backtracking now. you said so in other threads that the only way to figure out who's #1 p4p is to have pac move up to fight where floyd is, since pac came in at 144 anyway right? now isn't that pure insecurity or stupidity? lol yeah plumber boy.. when im earning 6figures. but who would believe me? who gives a fuck? NO ONE. same thing as you posting your credentials...

Bogler, why would it seem so frightening to you for Pacquiao (who was 144 in his last fight) to fight mayweather (who was 148 in his last fight)? That doesn't seem like a ridiculous disparity to me... ya know? Was it absurd for PBF to fight guys 15 and 20 lbs bigger? Is it "dumb" for Pac to jump to 140?? About as "dumb" as it was for Shane to go from 135 to 147. Actually, yes. I'd LOVE to hear about your credentials. Please, impress the hell outta me, Blue Chip. why the hell would it frighten me for pac to move up? if he wants to its all up to him if he can. the point is, which you didnt get, is you wanting him to skip2 divisions right away (not grow into it or at least get tuneup fights) just to prove to that insecure head of yours that pbf is really the #1 p4p of the two? now thats stupid dont you think? you get it now? for an eng'g student and w/ credentials like yours, yes, your posts about this particular topic indicate otherwise. you should have gathered all the pertinent data and facts not just weight alone and not come up to a closed minded decision like yours. you created and fell into your own trap, would anyone here really care what you do? what were you thinking? i dont need to impress you nor anyone here w/ credentials, and as you normally do here, no one gives a fuck! hey im havin fun here.. lol.