If Juarez had of been undefeated do you think the scorring would have been different?

that is interesting. i guess cowboy vince doesn't think so though.It is, forums are meant for discussions but on this site people spam your threads, ignore them or type some inane thing. I want to discuss things in new ways think about things that are challenging, people ignore these threads, asian sensation is an intelligent poster, lots are but they just get ignored and their threads thrown to the ground. I am tired of "was castillo robbed against mayweather' and "would you hit it" threads. Sometimes it makes me mad and i rail abit but sometimes i see interesting posts not enough though. It makes me wonder why should i post if people just ignore it, all it takes these days is for me to post on a thread and it kills it. Boxing has so many facets of discussion, if people think more and learn more. Thats what makes it a great sport, the rich history of it to the marketing taking over the glory of it. It's all interesting but noone thinks about it or cares. Just my thoughts for what they matter.

I believe that is called Phonetically, not by hearing. Oooops! Peace Bro!!!Man you are dumb, they are the same thing you retard think a little more before you post your blithering and pathetic attacks. Hearing The sense by which sound is perceived; the capacity to hear. Phonetics Of, relating to, or being features of pronunciation that are not phonemically distinctive in a language, as aspiration of consonants or vowel length in English. Either or, retard.

being undefeated doesnt make any difference. fighting marco antonio barrera is. for some reason, if you dont come up big with every single round, most likely it will go for MAB.

I believe that is called Phonetically, not by hearing. Oooops! Peace Bro!!!

It might not be so bad if you change the spelling to the way it was meant to be spelled. Shub-Niggurath AND you write NIGGA rath. Someone give me a high five!!!!!!!!!! Peace!!!!! Oh please, it sounds the same whichever way i spell it of the two you wouldn't have known that if i hadn't looked it up, i spelled it by hearing not sight. Sue me.

i was just playing with you to begin with, but the fact it's a "black" goat named "niggarath" is a little suspect. i know you didn't make it up, im just wondering what the guy was thinking who did make it up. You make an interesting point. It was around that time of lynchings and such of blacks in America. Another point is the "thousand young," part at that time the birth rate for black women was higher, even more noticable is back in the 1800s, it was Significantly higher. ie 186041.455.0h 187038.355.4i 192026.935.0 These show the number of children born to women in that era For every one thousand women this is the number of children born per year. it is always quite a bit higher.

It is all in the way you spelled it! i was just playing with you to begin with, but the fact it's a "black" goat named "niggarath" is a little suspect. i know you didn't make it up, im just wondering what the guy was thinking who did make it up. It might not be so bad if you change the spelling to the way it was meant to be spelled. Shub-Niggurath AND you write NIGGA rath. Someone give me a high five!!!!!!!!!! Peace!!!!!

what is a "niggarath"? sounds like a thinly veiled attempt to hide a racist slur http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shub-Niggurath Shub-Niggurath (The Black Goat of the Woods with a Thousand Young) is a fictional deity in the Cthulhu Mythos of H. P. Lovecraft. The being first appeared in Lovecraft's revision story "The Last Test" (1928); however, in Lovecraft's fiction, she is never actually described, but is frequently mentioned or called upon in incantations. Shub-Niggurath also appears in the works of other mythos authors, including August Derleth, Lin Carter, and Brian Lumley.

Thanks Bro! I have to admit, some you fellow sparring partners are hilarious. Thanks for the BIG PUSH "All Eyes Open" it takes good people to recognize good things. Don’t get me wrong, you all are good people. If we write with our eyes wide open and our dirty mind shut, you would be amazed at how well we can all write. Keep up the good work guys. Opinions of one another are formed when we speak and write nonsense. Remember, your character is a reflection of what you write for others to read.

I think that Cowboyvince just proved this retard wrong, very intelligent post constantly on this forum. Great post vinnie, even though i dont think Juarez won, I gotta give karma points for that. Regardless of what bullshit that surounds a fight from start til long after is finished, inside the ring it's just 2 men, and if they fight with alot of heart and as hard as they can, no matter who wins they both look good, in this case they both looked great, and i cant wait to see both of their next fight. I think MAB won the fight by 1 point maybe more, but the draw was fair and it should have been left that way. He wont acknowledge he won cause it was a hard fight, & i'd say he has about 1 or 2 of those left in him(Pac) and he's looking to cement his legacy(& a big pay day), a few fighters are looking for that, Hopkins/RJJ/Wright, and i'm sure that Barrera & Morales should be looking for that too. We'll all see how strong of a motivation that is for them. & if we're lucky we'll see a performance worthy of their legacy, what a sport. Alright i reneg, i was mad at something else and shouldn't have posted what i have. I apologise. I think Rocky should have let his hands go more and he would have finished MAB, the respective faces showed who really got the better of it in that fight. But yes it was that Rocky lost it not that MAB won it.

coming from a racist i wouldn't expect anything less./ the bowels of "niggarath" come on pal, we know what your trying to say Yeah a long mythical figure is in some way associated with racism on my part. Noone is "racist" here If you quit playing the racist card you wouldn't create problems, i have black friends, i don't care the only difference is the percentage of melanine in their skin> if you quit screaming racism every five minutes we could get along

I have yet to see one intelligent post on this site in about 6 months, if there is one posted, people ignore it. Half the people here don't even know how to use proper english and type gibberish noone can understand. I think that Cowboyvince just proved this retard wrong, very intelligent post constantly on this forum. Great post vinnie, even though i dont think Juarez won, I gotta give karma points for that. Regardless of what bullshit that surounds a fight from start til long after is finished, inside the ring it's just 2 men, and if they fight with alot of heart and as hard as they can, no matter who wins they both look good, in this case they both looked great, and i cant wait to see both of their next fight. I think MAB won the fight by 1 point maybe more, but the draw was fair and it should have been left that way. He wont acknowledge he won cause it was a hard fight, & i'd say he has about 1 or 2 of those left in him(Pac) and he's looking to cement his legacy(& a big pay day), a few fighters are looking for that, Hopkins/RJJ/Wright, and i'm sure that Barrera & Morales should be looking for that too. We'll all see how strong of a motivation that is for them. & if we're lucky we'll see a performance worthy of their legacy, what a sport.

Reviewing the Rocky vs. Barrera Showdown I just finished viewing the "Rocky" vs. "Barrera" fight again in hopes of determining some other point of view. Therefore, I have since reformed my opinion which leaves me agreeing with most of the people that have posted threads and commented on others regarding the initial and final outcome. My initial comments were in favor of "ROCKY", and his aggression, which has not changed a whole heck of a lot. However, I have to agree with the comment that was based on viewers reaction when judges screw-up on the tabulation of fights that end-up being remarkably close fights. The remote-viewers are left to think the worst when judges screw-up on the cards. Especially when it is corrected after they are off the airwaves. Take the fact that Barrera is not the champ for a second. How do you score the fight? Tabulations can not be corrected by scoring two 10/10 rounds for the twelfth round. It should have been corrected well before the end of the fight. I believe that this is where the problem lies. Other than the fact that I stated, it was a hell of a fight and it should have been left as a draw. Just imagine if all the outcomes were this great and there were no phantom blows to argue about. You have to admit, Barrera is the champ, and therefore, my boy should have laid him out in a convincingly fashion if he was to take the title. They are both fighters with great attitudes and that is why you did not hear Barrera acknowledging that he thought he won the fight. The “CHAMP” does not want to fight “Rocky” again, and why should he? He has to go for the money while he has a chance, and “Rocky” on the other-hand has earned his stripes at the expense of a well fought match without a favorable outcome. However, “Rocky” said it best in his post interview when he said “I have no choice but to accept the outcome of the fight, but I think that I gained more fans because of the outcome, maybe even some California fans that otherwise would never had know who I am” What a sport! PEACE!!!!!!!!!

Only if Morita wasn't involved. He also scored Juarez previous, and only, loss. I think he's on DLH's payroll...

It would of made no diffrence. The right fighter won the fight

It feels like to me that Juarez didn't start trying to really hurt MAB until about the 10 round(if he had started earlier IMO he would've possibly won), but when he did start landing uppercuts and hard punches Barrera just kept coming, it was IMO the best fight of '06 so far. Did you notice how everytime Rocky drew blood from his nose Barrera would hit him with like 4 unanswered punches. If Barrera would have won by one or two points(offically), it would have been fair, the draw was also fair, I dont see Juarez winning this fight no matter how you see it. I understand that aggression is major part of the sport but IMHO if it's not more effective then what the other man is doing then it wont sway me, I go for the man who's owning the ring. dont get me wrong Juarez was effective, but it didn't stop Barrera from fighting his fight. and how can a fight that happened 2 days ago be old news, it looks like people are just here to talk about the language and dont give a fuck about boxing, that just sad, get a life.

Have you not heard this before? If dont have anything nice to say, dont say anything at all! There is nothing dumb or old in this forum. It is a vehicle for opinions that matter to more than oneself, try to keep it real Bro! If it is not to your taste, check out another "chat room" somewhere else. Peace!I have yet to see one intelligent post on this site in about 6 months, if there is one posted, people ignore it. Half the people here don't even know how to use proper english and type gibberish noone can understand.

Keep it real Bro! Have you not heard this before? If dont have anything nice to say, dont say anything at all! There is nothing dumb or old in this forum. It is a vehicle for opinions that matter to more than oneself, try to keep it real Bro! If it is not to your taste, check out another "chat room" somewhere else. Peace!

could be right, undefeated fighters always get the benifet of the doubt in a close fight, but then again, rocky was in with a ring legend, so i think barrera still would of held more weight.

No but i think the juarez fight is old news now and the dumb threeads should cease and more unimaginative and dumb threads should be made about different stuff, in other words back to normal.