I don't know if this has been discussed but I would really appreciate your opinion. Intelligent answers are appreciated but if you're a fan-boy of either fighter then go ahead and post your comments.
...barrera got knocked out by junior jones,morales just been stopped by pacman (tko)
HAMED NEVER BEEN STOPPED OR KNOCKED OUT!
he will be... when he fights pac :p
I Vote For Pacquiao.you Said Hamed Never Been Knock-out.the Same Like Barera And Morales They Never Been Knock-out.only Pacman Destroy Them.i Think Hamed Will Be The Next Victim.if They Will Fight Each Other.
...barrera got knocked out by junior jones,morales just been stopped by pacman (tko)
HAMED NEVER BEEN STOPPED OR KNOCKED OUT!
those losses have no bearing in manny's career right now.
my friend IMHO they did have a bearing ... as hard lessons that PAC learned along the way to becoming one of the best p4p fighters on the planet...
i vote for pac just for the reason of his attitude and determination. pac became a lot better and more determined after his KO losses early in his career.. he even improved a lot after his loss to EM. Now after Hamed's loss, what did he do? Pac would impose his will on Hamed, IMHO.
that's very true, after each loss, PAC came back better...
after 1st loss, string of victories took him to flyweight world title...
after 2nd loss, string of victories took him to super bantam world title, to ring mags featherweight title, to become one of the best p4p figthers on the planet...
after 3rd loss, koed 2 solid 130 pounder and one of them happened to be THE GREAT ERIK MORALES...
keep on dreaming :p
i will always dream of the prince comming back! do i think he will beat pacman if they ever fought, no....do i think he can knock down pacman, yes
i think hamed got a wicked power in his punches, i think he will catch a perfectly placed looping hook to pacmans jaw and its good night
keep on dreaming :p
Manny First 2 Losses Were Against Weak Opposition...
Those were actually 2 of the reasons why he's good right now, better chin, better boxing skills than 10 or so years ago. Losses made him a lot better.
Manny First 2 Losses Were Against Weak Opposition...
this is boxing. Shyt happens, but Manny has improved greatly since that time. Went on to knock out both the great Barrera and Morales and was OBVIOUSLY robbed against anotha great fighta in Marquez.
Nas was good, but Pacquiao is just amazing.
Hamed's chin has never actually been tested and that's a credit to NAZ because he is one slippery dude.
Exactly he was so elusive,manny is easier to hit, with NAZ at his peak DEF K.O
i vote for pac just for the reason of his attitude and determination. pac became a lot better and more determined after his KO losses early in his career.. he even improved a lot after his loss to EM. Now after Hamed's loss, what did he do? Pac would impose his will on Hamed, IMHO.
Hamed was a one-dimensional fighter with virtually no defense. Pacquiao punches just as hard as him, and has many weapons. Manny would be focused, Hamed would probably not be. Barrera exposed every weakness that Princess had, and after that he wasn't the same. Pacquiao is a very good strategist. If you disagree, watch the rematch with Morales. He figured him out, and dominated the last half of the fight. I just don't see this being competitive.
I agree with you...It's just that there's alot of people here that make bold statements without the back-up!!!Thanks for replying.
Can u please specify? I'm not doubting that Pac can't win.I just would like to know how,In your opinion.
Hamed was a one-dimensional fighter with virtually no defense. Pacquiao punches just as hard as him, and has many weapons. Manny would be focused, Hamed would probably not be. Barrera exposed every weakness that Princess had, and after that he wasn't the same. Pacquiao is a very good strategist. If you disagree, watch the rematch with Morales. He figured him out, and dominated the last half of the fight. I just don't see this being competitive.