My predicition for Peter v Little Klit

It >>>WAS<<< a camoflauged thread bump, don't even fucking bullshit me. I know what it was. Red Man(tm) tries his hand at psychology. "Thou sayeth gay many times, thus thee must be gay!".....hah. Go lay a fuckin roof in some rich persons subdivision and work on your tan for your hooker friend you punched in the eye, sweaty non undershirt wearing fool .. Is that the best you could do?

Not a thread bump. A pointed statement that Nautilis is in denial about the excuses his boy/his boy's camp makes and his inability to refute that the accusations came. Had it been longer than 8 minutes since his post, perhaps your theory might have some credibility. It >>>WAS<<< a camoflauged thread bump, don't even fucking bullshit me. I know what it was. As to the judgement that the thread is gay, I will defer to you on that since it seems you are the resident expert on all things gay. Red Man(tm) tries his hand at psychology. "Thou sayeth gay many times, thus thee must be gay!".....hah. Go lay a fuckin roof in some rich persons subdivision and work on your tan for your hooker friend you punched in the eye, sweaty non undershirt wearing fool ..

Not a thread bump. A pointed statement that Nautilis is in denial about the excuses his boy/his boy's camp makes and his inability to refute that the accusations came. Had it been longer than 8 minutes since his post, perhaps your theory might have some credibility. As to the judgement that the thread is gay, I will defer to you on that since it seems you are the resident expert on all things gay. The burden of providing the proof is on you. Please provide an actual QUOTE of Wlad saying something about vaseline, and I will STOP being a fan of Wlad. I promise. I will really do. P.S. BTW, I like your posts a lot, negative or positive, and do not mean to be flaming.

Not a thread bump. A pointed statement that Nautilis is in denial about the excuses his boy/his boy's camp makes and his inability to refute that the accusations came. Had it been longer than 8 minutes since his post, perhaps your theory might have some credibility. As to the judgement that the thread is gay, I will defer to you on that since it seems you are the resident expert on all things gay.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH lame. . why so? :) The burden of providing the proof is on you. Please provide an actual quote of Wlad saying something about vaseline, and I will STOP being a fan of Wlad. I promise.

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b120/mnash_98/2.jpg

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH lame. camoflauged thread bump detected. just let it die. it's a gay thread anyway. do not bump the gayness.

There is a presumption of innocence. You have to prove that Wlad said something that implicates him, not the other way around. The artciles cited may provide an indrect evidence, but they lack a quote. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH lame.

Because the accusations came out of their camps, not from the fighter himself. Can you find a single quote from Little Klit saying he never said that? There is a presumption of innocence. You have to prove that Wlad said something that implicates him, not the other way around. The artciles cited may provide an indrect evidence, but they lack a quote.

Because the accusations came out of their camps, not from the fighter himself. Can you find a single quote from Little Klit saying he never said that?

I guess all of these people are lying, and only you have the facts in the case: Yahoo Web Search Results Google Web Search Results MSN Web Search Results Focusing on the first set of search result and first five links, none of the articles QUOTE Vitaliy or Wlad. They mention other people say about vaseline, but not Wlad or Vitaliy. I am not stating that people are lying, but I think that I have never read a single source QUOTING Wlad or Vitaliy about the stupid vaseline story.

I guess all of these people are lying, and only you have the facts in the case: Yahoo Web Search Results Google Web Search Results MSN Web Search Results

You might consider referencing a somewhat less biased source on the issue if you want to be taken seriously. They would not bring Souza into the attempted lawsuit unless they were trying to imply that he was part of "the conspiracy" to rob him of a victory. The reason they didn't mention it in the letters is that they KNEW it was a lame excuse, and they also knew that Souza would sue the fuck out of them and win. The fact that I was able to site 3 seperate sources on the accusation with a quick search and all you have is their ow official webste sort of speaks volumes, doesn't it? Come on, three sources that copy from each other as Beavis and Butthead did on one of their exams... The problem is that they copy an anecdotical evidence, not an actual QUOTE. Wlad changed the whole support team after the accident, including Souza. That is true. But I have never seen any single source QUOTING Wlad or Vit saying that vaseline was behind the demise. Please provide at least one source that actually QUOTES Wlad or Vit on this.

Scenario 1 Wlad wins by late round TKO or Points: The board will erupt into a battle between people who say that beating the untested Peter proves nothing and the usual gang of Klit nuthuggers with a few new bandwagon jumpers (the same ones who jump on the bandwagon of every fighter who wins a televised fight). The battle will continue to rage until Castillo v Corrales II when the Klit nuthuggers will be overwhelmed because the bandwagon jumpers have left them outnumbered by finding a new Messiah. Scenario 2 Peter wins by early round KO The board will erupt into a three way battle between people who say that beating the glass-jawed Wlad proves nothing, the Peter fans (mostly people who are just praying that someone intersting has finally emerged in the HW division) joined by a few new bandwagon jumpers (the same ones who jump on the bandwagon of every fighter who wins a televised fight) against the usual gang of Klit nuthuggers and the few whacked out Klit apologists (who will claim that the reason Wlad lost is because Don King drugged Manny Pacquiou's socks after Joe Souza filled them with Vaseline and Manny only trained them to go 2 rounds). The battle will continue to rage until Castillo v Corrales II when the bandwagon jumpers have found a new Messiah and everyone else is too busy disputing or defending the outcome of what should be a hellacious fight. I could be wrong, though So let me get this straight... What you're saying is... the real fight is October 8th :D

Wlad has way to much heart to stay down. he didnt stay down vs sanders and look what happened. its like how roy said during golatas last fight with brewster, "Golata will NOT recova from this" lol..once peter connects with one shot wlad will NOT recova from this

Focusing on the first link, the actual documental evidence quoted there -- the letter of Burstein -- does not contain any mention of Souza's vaseline story. The reporter does append the vaseline story to his commentary on Burstein's letter, but this is not what Burstein or Klichko acually said themselves. Moreover, at no point in time had the Klichko camp offically claimed that the Souza's vaseline has anything to do with Wlad's demise in the Brewster fight. All of the official Klichko news and letters are archived at www.klichko.com. You might consider referencing a somewhat less biased source on the issue if you want to be taken seriously. They would not bring Souza into the attempted lawsuit unless they were trying to imply that he was part of "the conspiracy" to rob him of a victory. The reason they didn't mention it in the letters is that they KNEW it was a lame excuse, and they also knew that Souza would sue the fuck out of them and win. The fact that I was able to site 3 seperate sources on the accusation with a quick search and all you have is their ow official webste sort of speaks volumes, doesn't it?

well i'd like to see peter win, but he won't........... my prediction is that we'll see peter do a judah-like chicken dance in or around the 4th round!! brutal KO win for WLAD........no kd's....it'll be over at the first & only fall. I don't think so man, Wlad was never a one-punch KO artist. It was always accumulation of punches. I do agree that Peter will go down though.

well i'd like to see peter win, but he won't........... my prediction is that we'll see peter do a judah-like chicken dance in or around the 4th round!! brutal KO win for WLAD........no kd's....it'll be over at the first & only fall.

Yes, it is: http://www.boston.com/sports/other_sports/boxing/articles/2004/05/10/this_lawyer_not_raising_the_bar?pg=full http://www.fightnews.com/scott172.htm http://www.boxingscene.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1234 Focusing on the first link, the actual documental evidence quoted there -- the letter of Burstein -- does not contain any mention of Souza's vaseline story. The reporter does append the vaseline story to his commentary on Burstein's letter, but this is not what Burstein or Klichko acually said themselves. Moreover, at no point in time had the Klichko camp offically claimed that the Souza's vaseline has anything to do with Wlad's demise in the Brewster fight. All of the official Klichko news and letters are archived at www.klichko.com.

Wlad never claimed this. This is not the story that came from Wlad's team. Yes, it is: http://www.boston.com/sports/other_sports/boxing/articles/2004/05/10/this_lawyer_not_raising_the_bar?pg=full http://www.fightnews.com/scott172.htm http://www.boxingscene.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1234