These two guys are both awsome boxers with all of the great skills they bring to the ring but I was wondering who do you all think is the better boxer of the two?
Hopkins has plenty of natural ability. He proved he could take a punch early on, and he was 95-4 in the amatuers.
Hopkins is as smart as Toney, can counter-punch as good, but that only would make him even with Toney.
What makes him better are two things:
1) better agressor
2) effort
My opinion.
aggresiveness doesn't fit into Toney's style but I cantell you that he's plenty agressive. He just never looks it b/c he knows how to stay ultra calm in the ring and save his energy.
effort is the only thing that Toney lacks.
hmm
Hopkins has plenty of natural ability. He proved he could take a punch early on, and he was 95-4 in the amatuers.
Hopkins is as smart as Toney, can counter-punch as good, but that only would make him even with Toney.
What makes him better are two things:
1) better agressor
2) effort
My opinion.
I Think Hopkins Is A Better Boxer. Hopkins Is More Dedicated To The Sport . Toney Is Very Good , He Can Take A Punch And He Is Definitly Willing To Do What It Takes To Win. Hopkins Is A Better Adjuster. With Every Fight Hopkins Has A Different Game Plan. He Knows That Styles Make Fights.
Toney is an overall better boxer, but hopkins is more consistent. In my opinion, had toney stayed at middleweight we would have stopped talking about hopkins years ago...
I would agree with that statement..
The Better Boxer? Hopkins or Toney
Toney is an overall better boxer, but hopkins is more consistent. In my opinion, had toney stayed at middleweight we would have stopped talking about hopkins years ago...
Id just go with Toney, but I didnt wanna say it to early in the thread. Thats probally because they are close in skill but me likeing James a lot pushes him over the edge.
i'd say nard is the better overall boxer, although toney is master boxer as well.. toney's best qualities are defense and counter punching, while nard does everything well...
A GREAT DEAL OF BOXING goes into being a counter puncher
i think hopkins is better then toney plain and simpel so i picked hopkins boxing pure boxer ability to box i liek hopkins whatever
b-hop started as a brawler, learned to counterpunch and developed reflexes, now he's kind of a mix of a guy who can brawl when he has to, but mostly stays on defense looking to counterpunch . he doesnt really have a one sided style, bernard is what you could call 'a ten dimensional fighter', he can brawl, he can box, or he can just slack off and catch a breath avoiding your punches and picking perfect shots on you. HE WILL OWN TAYLORS JAB WITH THE OVERHAND LEFT! OMFG FOUR DAYS UNTIL THIS FIGHT I CANNOT WAIT. when bernard fights something comes over me and i pay so close of attention to the fight. i look at his feet i watch how he moves and boxes and changes stances and just amazes me.
hes a phenom, like floyd
did you just call Nard a brawler???
wtf man
Yup. View some of his older fights before eastman. All he did was chase people around the ring. It seems funny how he gets a bad rep now....for running....when he only did that like 1 or 2 times.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
Hopkisn beats toney by a boring UD, toney is a counter pucnher isnt he? so i guess hopkins would be a better "boxer"
A GREAT DEAL OF BOXING goes into being a counter puncher
Toney is by far the better "pure boxer". Hopkins is a brawler.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!