This is out of the Ring Rankings from December 1984 and as of May 9th 2005.
Pick the winner in these match ups:
Heavyweight: Larry Holmes vs Vitali Klitschko
Cruiseweight: Carlos Deleon vs Jean Marc Moremeck
Light Heavy: Michael Spinks vs Glen Johnson
Supermiddle: No fighters listed in either year
Middleweight: Marvin Hagler vs Bernard Hopkins
Jr Middle: Tommy Hearns vs Winky Wright
Welterweight: (#1 Ranked) Milton McCroy vs Zab Judah
Jr Welter: Alexis Arguello vs Kostya Tszyu
LtWeight: (#1 Ranked) Edwin Rosario vs Diego Corrales
JrLtweight: Rocky Lockridge vs (#1 Rated) M A Barrera
Featherweight: Euesbio Pedroza vs Manny Pacquiao
Note: All divisions below this point have vacent Champions in one or both years.
Winky would have no chance of outboxing Hearns. Never mind Leonard, Hearns also outboxed slicksters Hill and Benitez. The latter is an all time great and a superb boxer, but Tommy put on an absolute clinic. Tommy was a terror for the straight boxer beacuse not only could he outbox them but the threat of the huge right hand was always there.
Gotcha. I was thinking something else for some reason. Anyway, I think that you're right about the arm length and its only logical that Holmes would have the longer arms. Holmes himself was what....6'3 1/2 or something?
Yeah, Holmes was in that 6'3/6'4 range.
Holmes reach is listed as being 81". Vitali's is listed as being 80" (both according to boxrec).
Gringo, the broadness of each of their backs is taken into account when measuring their respective reaches. Arms wide apart, fingertip to fingertip...That's a fighter's reach.
I thinks it's safe to say Vitali's back is thicker/wider than Holmes, because in his prime, Larry was fairly thin up in the shoulder area. That would also mean that Holmes' arm length more than makes up for the difference (considering Holmes' reach is slightly more), and he would have to be noticably longer in arm length than what Vitali is...Know what I mean?
Gotcha. I was thinking something else for some reason. Anyway, I think that you're right about the arm length and its only logical that Holmes would have the longer arms. Holmes himself was what....6'3 1/2 or something?
I think he had a slight reach advantage in terms of arm length but do you know if his back was as broad? I think that may have a slight effect on it too.
That's just the thing, a lot of the guys that Holmes had his way with would have troubled all of the HW champs of today. It speaks volumes about the current state of HW boxing.
Holmes reach is listed as being 81". Vitali's is listed as being 80" (both according to boxrec).
Gringo, the broadness of each of their backs is taken into account when measuring their respective reaches. Arms wide apart, fingertip to fingertip...That's a fighter's reach.
I thinks it's safe to say Vitali's back is thicker/wider than Holmes, because in his prime, Larry was fairly thin up in the shoulder area. That would also mean that Holmes' arm length more than makes up for the difference (considering Holmes' reach is slightly more), and he would have to be noticably longer in arm length than what Vitali is...Know what I mean?
Isn't Jeff Lacy the Super Middle weight Champ?
As of May 9th, the Ring has Super Middle vacent.
I like Lacey best at 168, but I was only inputting the ring rankings as they are at the moment.
Holmes may not have been as tall as VK, but I believe he has a slight reach advantage over Vitali (which is more important than strictly height, IMO). Same with Cooney, who also has a reach that's listed slightly more than what Vitali's is.
Boxrec doesn't have Leroy Jones' reach listed on his record, but the big guy was a very nice and smart boxer...especially for a man of his size (alot less awkward thasn Vitali, that's for sure). He could move very well around the ring, threw a very quick and accurate jab, and also had some pretty fast hands which he threw in combination. The big guy was a good fighter, who would also give Vitali a very, very tough test if he was around in today's heavyweight division.
I think he had a slight reach advantage in terms of arm length but do you know if his back was as broad? I think that may have a slight effect on it too.
That's just the thing, a lot of the guys that Holmes had his way with would have troubled all of the HW champs of today. It speaks volumes about the current state of HW boxing.
Hearns had very few problems with people who elected to box though. If i'm not mistaken he had a longer reach than Winky and he would just sit outside and jab him to death until that right hand and left hook came behind it. Hearns jab was lightining fast and powerful. Even though it seemed like he'd just flick it out there he was very good at making you aware of it so he could set up the right behind it. Hearns also won't fade down the stretch since Winky's pressure and power isn't enough to trouble him. Tommy was a master of all punches...Winky has never seen anything even close to him. Hearns would put him to sleep in the mid-late rounds.
Jr Middle: Tommy Hearns vs Winky Wright
Tommy Hearns would win by UD. Winky isnt all that, he had a close fight with Vargas, and if his fight with Trinidad happened earlier, at JR, he would of lost.
I honestly dont think Trinidad could beat Winky at 154
Winky did lose to Vargas but Winky today would destroy that Vargas
and Trinidad just never fought a fighter like Winky
hmm
I'd go with Hopkins over Hagler by MD but would be rooting for Hagler. Both are all-time greats but I think Hops has what it takes to edge out a thrillingly close decision over Hagler, prime for prime.
But when was Hearns ever outboxed?
Winky wouldn't rip into him like Leonard, Hagler, and Barkley did.
Hearns was an excellent boxer as well.
The thing with All 3 you named where that they where all willing to exchange at times, which made for good fights and gave Hearns a chance. Winky would not give a puncher a chance to brawl. he is content with boxing the whole fight never taking a risk. Which is why i think he would win.
Holmes was a pretty big guy himself and his skills, natural abilities and chin were all superior to Vitali's. As Yogi said, Cooney and Jones were both bigger fighters and he dealt with them.
Holmes may not have been as tall as VK, but I believe he has a slight reach advantage over Vitali (which is more important than strictly height, IMO). Same with Cooney, who also has a reach that's listed slightly more than what Vitali's is.
Boxrec doesn't have Leroy Jones' reach listed on his record, but the big guy was a very nice and smart boxer...especially for a man of his size (alot less awkward thasn Vitali, that's for sure). He could move very well around the ring, threw a very quick and accurate jab, and also had some pretty fast hands which he threw in combination. The big guy was a good fighter, who would also give Vitali a very, very tough test if he was around in today's heavyweight division.
I'm sorry but Winky Wright outbox a 154 pound Thomas Hearns? Hearns at 154 looked damned near unbeatable and the only way to deal with him was to get to his chin...something Winky would not do. Hearns would box circles around Winky and stop him late. A better fight there would have been 154 Duran vs. Winky.
Holmes was a pretty big guy himself and his skills, natural abilities and chin were all superior to Vitali's. As Yogi said, Cooney and Jones were both bigger fighters and he dealt with them.
Hagler would most likely have taken a decision over Hopkins. If it's 2004 version of Hop then there is the possibility of a late stoppage as well but I think it would most likely go to a decision.
The killer for me is Corrales/Rosario. Rosario was a huge puncher himself and took all kinds of abuse from Chavez. I think he could take Corrales' best and get to him but it's a close call.
Okay Holmes is a better fighter than Vitali Klitschko, but I want to know this from the people who thought Holmes would UD/KO him....what fights have Holmes been in what make you think Vitali's size won't be a factor?
Size wasn't a factor at all when Holmes had his way with both Leroy Jones and Gerry Cooney. Both those fighters were in the neighborhood of 6'6 in height, which isn't that much shorter than Vitali (an inch or so).
Okay Holmes is a better fighter than Vitali Klitschko, but I want to know this from the people who thought Holmes would UD/KO him....what fights have Holmes been in what make you think Vitali's size won't be a factor?
Heavyweight: Larry Holmes vs Vitali Klitschko, Holmes UD
Cruiseweight: Carlos Deleon vs Jean Marc Moremeck, Mormeck UD
Light Heavy: Michael Spinks vs Glen Johnson, Spinks KO8
Middleweight: Marvin Hagler vs Bernard Hopkins, Hagler UD
Jr Middle: Tommy Hearns vs Winky Wright, Hearns KO10
Welterweight: (#1 Ranked) Milton McCroy vs Zab Judah, Zab UD
Jr Welter: Aaron Pryor vs Kostya Tszyu, Pryor KO10
LtWeight: (#1 Ranked) Edwin Rosario vs Diego Corrales, Corrales KO8
JrLtweight: Rocky Lockridge vs (#1 Rated) M A Barrera, Barrera UD
Featherweight: Euesbio Pedroza vs Manny Pacquiao, Pedroza UD
Note: All divisions below this point have vacent Champions in one or both years.
This is out of the Ring Rankings from December 1984 and as of May 9th 2005.
Pick the winner in these match ups:
Heavyweight: Larry Holmes vs Vitali Klitschko = Holmes by SD
Cruiseweight: Carlos Deleon vs Jean Marc Moremeck = Mormeck by KO
Light Heavy: Michael Spinks vs Glen Johnson = Spinks by SD
Supermiddle: No fighters listed in either year =
Middleweight: Marvin Hagler vs Bernard Hopkins = Hopkins by SD
Jr Middle: Tommy Hearns vs Winky Wright = Hearns by TKO
Welterweight: (#1 Ranked) Milton McCroy vs Zab Judah = Judah KO
Jr Welter: Alexis Arguello vs Kostya Tszyu = Tszyu by KO
LtWeight: (#1 Ranked) Edwin Rosario vs Diego Corrales = Corrales BY TKO
JrLtweight: Rocky Lockridge vs (#1 Rated) M A Barrera = Barrera by KO
Featherweight: Euesbio Pedroza vs Manny Pacquiao = Pacquiao by ko