IBF Did Golovkin Multiple Financial Favors By Stripping Him


By Keith Idec

The IBF didn’t do itself any financial favors by stripping Gennady Golovkin of its middleweight title Wednesday.

By following its own rules – strangely a commendable move among often-unscrupulous sanctioning organizations – the IBF cost itself six figures in sanctioning fees by removing Golovkin as its middleweight champion. The New Jersey-based IBF would’ve made more money from sanctioning a Golovkin fight for its 160-pound title, particularly a rematch against Canelo Alvarez, than it’ll take from the purses of Sergiy Derevyanchenko and whoever its No. 1 middleweight contender fights for its suddenly unclaimed crown.

In an interesting twist among sanctioning bodies that typically cost fighters money, the IBF inadvertently did Golovkin multiple financial favors when it surprisingly stripped him.

Golovkin obviously will have to pay one less sanctioning fee the next time he fights, which often are negotiated sums in lucrative events such as the Canelo rematch. The Kazakh knockout artist still will have to pay for the right to defend the WBA, WBC and IBO titles, but he won’t owe the IBF anything out of his seven-figure purse.

Beyond those savings, by eliminating making a mandatory defense against Derevyanchenko as even an option for Golovkin, the IBF’s decision apparently has made him come to his senses and reconsider less than the 50-50 split Golovkin demanded recently for a second fight against Alvarez.

Tom Loeffler, Golovkin’s promoter, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal for a story posted to its website Wednesday night that Golovkin has changed his stance on a 50-50 split and wants to fight Alvarez again September 15.

That’s what makes the most financial sense for a 36-year-old champion who won’t have another opportunity to make potentially $30 million in one night if an opponent other than Alvarez beats him before he can secure that career-high payday. If he were to keep winning, Golovkin would have to fight five or six times, maybe more, to make what he could earn in what has become an even more intriguing middleweight championship rematch since Alvarez was suspended for failing two performance-enhancing drug tests in February.


While Golovkin clearly didn’t want to fight the unbeaten but unheralded Derevyanchenko next, his irrepressible insistence on keeping all his titles seemingly clouded Golovkin’s judgment once Alvarez withdrew from their scheduled May 5 rematch April 3. Golovkin should’ve vacated the IBF title, rather than paying the IBF a $20,000 fee to request the exception he eventually received to fight Vanes Martirosyan, rather than Derevyanchenko, on May 5 in Carson, California.

Yes, it’s all too easy for a reporter to tell a fighter who worked extremely hard to win a world title to simply give it up. But boxing Derevyanchenko in what would’ve been a dangerous fight, and for a fraction of what Golovkin can collect for fighting Alvarez again, never made any financial sense.

Ultimately, this is about Golovkin securing as much money as possible for the financial future of his family, which includes two young children. And it’s not like defeating Derevyanchenko (12-0, 10 KOs) would’ve done anything to enhance Golovkin’s legacy.

A prideful fighter like Golovkin, once the monster most didn’t want to fight, will have a tough time accepting that his critics contend that he ducked Derevyanchenko. But this fragile stage in his career is about maximizing his earnings while there’s still such high demand for an Alvarez rematch.

A second bout between Golovkin (38-0-1, 34 KOs) and Alvarez (49-1-2, 34 KOs) will never be more marketable or more profitable than it is now. Even if Golovkin were to have beaten Derevyanchenko, there still would be younger, undefeated challengers for him to fight, contenders detractors would claim Golovkin avoided if he instead pursued more lucrative alternatives.

Jermall Charlo (27-0, 21 KOs), the WBC’s interim middleweight champion and its mandatory challenger for Golovkin’s WBC crown, currently tops that list. Boxing fans understandably want to see Golovkin fight Charlo, Derevyanchenko, Demetrius Andrade (25-0, 16 KOs) and, to a lesser degree, Ryota Murata (14-1, 11 KOs).

Billy Joe Saunders was an appealing option for Golovkin, too, because Golovkin has long professed a desire to own all of boxing’s recognized middleweight titles at the same time. England’s Saunders (26-0, 12 KOs) possesses the WBO title Golovkin would’ve needed to win to achieve that dream.

Problem is, even if Golovkin would’ve added the WBO belt to his IBF, IBO, WBA and WBC championships, mandatory responsibilities wouldn’t have allowed him to keep those five titles long. Besides, sensible boxing fans know Golovkin is the middleweight champion of the world until an opponent proves otherwise inside the ring.

Regardless, Golovkin apparently realizes the time has come for the longtime middleweight champion to put his pride aside and embrace the biggest, most profitable fight available to him.

He should be compensated for the trouble Alvarez’s two positive tests for clenbuterol caused him recently. Golovkin settled for a reported purse of $1.2 million for the Martirosyan match, when he was supposed to make somewhere between $25 million and $30 million for the Alvarez rematch.

That concession essentially has been made by Oscar De La Hoya, Alvarez’s promoter, offering Golovkin a 60-40 split for their second showdown. Golovkin accepted a 70-30 split for their first fight and was willing to take a 65-35 split for their rematch when it was initially negotiated for May 5.

An angry Golovkin wanted more money once Alvarez’s clenbuterol debacle destroyed their May 5 rematch. That was an equitable expectation met with a reasonable response of 60-40.

Demanding a 50-50 split was unrealistic, despite that Golovkin is the undefeated defending champion who should’ve won a decision in their first fight September 16 in Las Vegas. His undeserved draw and suspension aside, Alvarez remains the unquestioned ‘A’ side in their rematch.

You need not look any further than their pay-per-view production and reported purses for proof.

That said, Alvarez will make more money for fighting Golovkin than he would for facing anyone else September 15. From a credibility standpoint, the besmirched superstar needs to get in the ring with Golovkin again as well.

Daniel Jacobs (34-2, 29 KOs), who was offered a fight against Alvarez on Tuesday, is a dangerous alternative for the Mexican icon. Similar to Golovkin’s fight against Derevyanchenko, facing Jacobs makes little sense for Alvarez when he could make much more money for boxing Golovkin again.

Alvarez isn’t the one dissatisfied with his eight-figure split, though. It’s up to Golovkin to become more reasonable and ensure he gets the opportunity to make Alvarez pay the best way Golovkin knows how.

If stripping Golovkin of its middleweight title Wednesday indeed leads him back to his rematch against Alvarez, the IBF will have done him more than one financial favor.

Keith Idec is a senior writer/columnist for He can be reached on Twitter @Idecboxing.

User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by Bud Crawford#1 on 06-11-2018

[QUOTE=boxingfan4ever;18840453]You are dreaming pal, Canelo is going to be killed this time...[/QUOTE] Amen to that my friend GGG is going to hit Canelo so hard when he wakes up he will be fluent in English

Comment by Bud Crawford#1 on 06-11-2018

GGG has all the gold, Did not get caught doping which led to rematch being cancelled in the first place, and is supposed to make less money than Canelo? on what planet is that fair?

Comment by kafkod on 06-08-2018

[QUOTE=budfr;18840861]It was proved with a hair folicle it was meat....if GGG really wanted to act macho, he should be moving up in weight and challenge Zurdo Ramirez or David Benavidez, both Mexican but no, he and his feminine fans like…

Comment by budfr on 06-08-2018

[QUOTE=allen23;18838300]those crazy accusations are based are hard evidence showing canelo was using ped's. how can u condone any fighter using performance enhancers. canelo and oscar as disgusting animals..only the blind would argue a case for them with the clear evidence…

Comment by budfr on 06-08-2018

Why do these reporters keep saying GGG should have won the fight vs Canelo?? It was a draw, fro crrying out loud !! Live with it, matter of fact, many think Canelo won...

Post a Comment - View More User Comments (60)
Top Headlines Nick Ball, Meshech Speare Added To MTK Liverpool Card Josh Taylor: I Want To Do a Number on Postol, Knock Him Out! De La Hoya: Canelo is So Angry at GGG - Woke Up Sleeping Giant! Hughie Fury Would Take Joshua Fight Right Away, Says Trainer Crawford vs. Spence Heating Up as The Next Big Fight at 147 Sanchez Hopes Canelo is Not Talking The Talk and 'Fights' GGG Ugas: At Some Point Spence Will Have To Face Me or Get Stripped Video: Abel Sanchez Talk Golovkin vs. Canelo Rematch Deal Dusty Harrison Granted Release From Roc Nation Sports Crawford-Spence is Impossible To Do Without PPV, Says Arum Video: Tom Loeffler Talks Canelo-Golovkin Deal, Saunders, IBF Video: Gennady Golovkin Talks Canelo Deal, Saunders, More Abel Sanchez Excited That Golovkin Stuck To His Principles Loeffler: 50-50 Was Fair; GGG Gave Canelo 5 Percent for His Ego! Loeffler: Golovkin Wants Saunders Next if He Can Beat Canelo Photos: Braekhus vs. Sagaydakovskya Set For Usyk-Gassiev Spence: Jermell Charlo Was Trying Too Hard to Knock Out Trout Luis Nery Suspended Until September 1 By The WBC Golovkin Promoter: Canelo Rematch Bigger Than Wilder-Joshua Tyson Fury Hopes To Get a Much Better Opponent on Aug. 18 Weekend Review: Spence, Golovkin-Canelo II, Roman, More Frank Warren: Jaime Munguia vs. Liam Smith Set, July 21 Hooker: Flanagan Overlooked Me; I Shocked the Boxing World! Lucas Browne vs. Roger Izonritei on July 29th in Sydney Carl Frampton Expects a Real Challenge From Luke Jackson Pavlik: I Would Rather Have Fought Froch Than Calzaghe Errol Spence: I Would Rather Fight Jessie Vargas Next Than Ugas Eddie Hearn Wants Fast-Moving Josh Kelly to Fight in America Paddy Barnes To Challenge For WBC Flyweight Belt, Aug 18 In Belfast Jamie McDonnell: I'm Going To 126-Pounds, Will Target Big Fights Lewis Benson believes he is taking reasoned risk in Coyle fight Usyk vs. Gassiev To Land in Moscow on July 21, Says RBF Exec Joe Joyce Willing To Face Bryant Jennings Next Hurshid Tojibaev, Two-Time Olympian, is Eager To Go Pro Arum Names Amir Khan as Possible Foe For Terence Crawford Ohara Davies Confident That He Would Beat Maurice Hooker Vijender Singh Aims To Impress Against Lee Markham, Win Title Errol Spence Continues To Make It Look Easy WBC Prez in High Spirits: Canelo-GGG Rematch Can Be a Classic! Miguel Berchelt Already on Weight, Feels Very Strong For Barros

Latest Active Forum Threads