Tweet
You ppl need to stop saying Martinez ducked ggg! Here’s proof that ggg and Tom Loefflor and the ggg militia are lying.
Martinez won the WBC by beating Kelly Pavlick on 04/2010 and 4 months later ggg was barely even fighting for the vacant interim WBA title. FFwd to 09/2012 a fight that many of us credit Sergio Martinez last good performance that actually ruined him vs Chavez JR at that same time GGG was barely fighting for the Vacant WBA Regular which we all consider a fake belt. Ok now ffwd to 06/2014 which was the fight Martinez basically was already shot and basically sold the torch to Cotto. What was Golovkin doing then? He was still the Vacant Regular WBA fake champ and it was only a month later that he beat Geale to be elavated to Vacant WBA super champ on 07/2014. My argument is this: under what circumstance can Golovkin a vacant regular fake wba champ claim Sergio a full fledged lineal and WBC champion Champion ducked him? How hard is it to understand that fighters in those positions with those fake belts aren’t taken seriously. Not to mention the fact that Martinez didn’t even take Rubio his mandatory wbc silver champ serious enough to fight him and why would he fight a fake champ of the other governing body before the fake champ in his own governing body? And let me just remind some of you that you need to get your time line in order and stop claiming that ggg was owed a shot at Martinez because he was his mandatory, this not so because Rubio was actually Martinez’s mandatory and Golovkin didn’t beat Rubio till 6 months after Martinez had already been retired by the loss to Cotto. I’m not really sure what other angle you ggg defenders will come up with but if I was a betting man you’ll probably say: GGG offered to fight Martinez and they declined and that’s considered a duck even for a 39 year old Martinez. But even for that ****** claim to have any legitimacy ggg would have to have never ducked any challenge or offer so that’s all! Thoughts my neary’s?
Martinez won the WBC by beating Kelly Pavlick on 04/2010 and 4 months later ggg was barely even fighting for the vacant interim WBA title. FFwd to 09/2012 a fight that many of us credit Sergio Martinez last good performance that actually ruined him vs Chavez JR at that same time GGG was barely fighting for the Vacant WBA Regular which we all consider a fake belt. Ok now ffwd to 06/2014 which was the fight Martinez basically was already shot and basically sold the torch to Cotto. What was Golovkin doing then? He was still the Vacant Regular WBA fake champ and it was only a month later that he beat Geale to be elavated to Vacant WBA super champ on 07/2014. My argument is this: under what circumstance can Golovkin a vacant regular fake wba champ claim Sergio a full fledged lineal and WBC champion Champion ducked him? How hard is it to understand that fighters in those positions with those fake belts aren’t taken seriously. Not to mention the fact that Martinez didn’t even take Rubio his mandatory wbc silver champ serious enough to fight him and why would he fight a fake champ of the other governing body before the fake champ in his own governing body? And let me just remind some of you that you need to get your time line in order and stop claiming that ggg was owed a shot at Martinez because he was his mandatory, this not so because Rubio was actually Martinez’s mandatory and Golovkin didn’t beat Rubio till 6 months after Martinez had already been retired by the loss to Cotto. I’m not really sure what other angle you ggg defenders will come up with but if I was a betting man you’ll probably say: GGG offered to fight Martinez and they declined and that’s considered a duck even for a 39 year old Martinez. But even for that ****** claim to have any legitimacy ggg would have to have never ducked any challenge or offer so that’s all! Thoughts my neary’s?
Comment