Originally posted by Curt Henning
View Post
What we do know now is a 36 year old version of him competed with a near prime or prime at most Canelo. And what we can only grasp logically is age matters in this sport, and we don’t get to reverse the process.
I’m not saying the difference would be night and day but there’s almost 0% as history says that a fighter is better at 36 than they were at 28-32.
It’s not a sure win in any case, but with all logic and comprehension it points to him doing better at 28-32. 99.9% percent give or take of boxers are better at 28-32 than there were at 36.
So you’re implying Golovkin ain’t one the case? To fit an agenda?
Hell even 3 years is a long time in boxing let alone 6.
Comment