how does the weigh in effect the outcome when pitting fighters up against each other from different eras. Back in the day, a weight class actually meant something, fighters like Jose Napoles came to fight at 144-145, with the fight on the same day he probably only weighed about 147-148 lbs.
How is it fair to match him up against say, a guy like Miguel Cotto, who is around the same height as Napoles, but with an extra day before to weigh in, comes in at around 157.
That's a 10 lb weight difference.
Manny Pacquiao was 146 lbs on fight night, for a fight that was to happen at 130. I'm sure that wasn't very beneficial for him however, but still he was pretty much a WW.
Considering back in the day fighters didn't even always come in at the WW max, often a few lbs under - suggesting the made the weight easy.
I know this isn't a huge factor, for example Hagler always came in pretty light for a MW, but regardless - nobody is cracking his chin anytime soon. However, on paper, Joshua Clottey - who comes in at over 160 in some of his fights would be as big as Marvin Hagler? seeing as they were both 5'9, although Hagler had a significant reach advantage.
just something to think about, or should we put the WW's up against todays Lw's?
EDIT: I know somebody is going to bring up a freak like Jake Lamotta who would cut tons of weight and rehydrate in one day, but let's be honest - it was rare.
How is it fair to match him up against say, a guy like Miguel Cotto, who is around the same height as Napoles, but with an extra day before to weigh in, comes in at around 157.
That's a 10 lb weight difference.
Manny Pacquiao was 146 lbs on fight night, for a fight that was to happen at 130. I'm sure that wasn't very beneficial for him however, but still he was pretty much a WW.
Considering back in the day fighters didn't even always come in at the WW max, often a few lbs under - suggesting the made the weight easy.
I know this isn't a huge factor, for example Hagler always came in pretty light for a MW, but regardless - nobody is cracking his chin anytime soon. However, on paper, Joshua Clottey - who comes in at over 160 in some of his fights would be as big as Marvin Hagler? seeing as they were both 5'9, although Hagler had a significant reach advantage.
just something to think about, or should we put the WW's up against todays Lw's?
EDIT: I know somebody is going to bring up a freak like Jake Lamotta who would cut tons of weight and rehydrate in one day, but let's be honest - it was rare.
Comment