Jacobs will have to move up soon. Guy was clearly much bigger than GGG. If he wants a rematch he should move up, get some titles and GGG will have to face him
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Sanchez: When Golovkin Goes To 168, Jacobs Will Be Dominant
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostI recently made the mistake of bringing up deryevchenko as the next great white hype,& I regretted mentioning him for fear Id create new deryevchenko fanbois.
Its a strange forum. So much race hating it makes me sad.
Usyk, kovalev, loma, GGG, beterbiev, Frampton. joe smith, grodysk, golowacki, I mean the list could go on. Look at the heavier weight classes, a guy like Fury even beat wlad easier than tank Joshua.
Then you had wlad who dominated the division for ten years. I find it so strange to single out races to hate in boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostI know these gggroupies along with sanchez were saying jacobs would get ko'd easy in 5 rds,& that this would be gigis statement victory to prove us" haters" wrong who were saying that gigi only kos tomatoes, & that once he beat jacobs wed all say he was a bum. Well I told several clowns,how can you be sure people were going to write jacobs off as a nobody based on his past opponents,Jacobs had nothing in common with them except glass jaw.
I even said many times,that if gigi destroys jacobs Id agree hes the real deal,but that nobody knew what level hes at since hes never fought anyone even as good as jacobs. Now suddenly 5'11" jacobs has transformed into a supposed cruiserweight overnight. & the irony is that jacobs & gigi looked almost the same size & build esp. since jacobs has thin chicken legs. When canelo fights a actual lhw @smw "he weight drained him",yet gigi fighting a supposed cruiserweight at160 means he was "weight bullied".
Comment
-
Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View PostNow they wanna do 168.
And no, Jacobs will not be dominant. Dude is being a tad bit overrated right now because he performed better than 99% of the people here expected.
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postmost people on this forum expected ggg to stop jacobs, including me, jacobs was a huge underdog it wasnt even close...
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/p...s&pollid=49016
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postthere are different type of polls, those asking who are you rooting for, and those asking for your prediction...
i wasnt rooting for ggg, i had no dog in that fight, but i really thought like almost everyone else that jacobs didnt have the chin to last 12, so i had ggg stopping jacobs, at the end i saw ggg winning a very close fight so i have no issue with the final result... but very few predicted this fight going the distance or jacobs winning...
He's wrong when he says only 1% saw what could happen before. No, false. Read: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=733835
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostIn the poll, you are correct, only 15% saw Jacobs winning. But you can find many written posts about it being a close fight. As I quoted some here.
He's wrong when he says only 1% saw what could happen before. No, false. Read: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=733835
to me, so even with 10-1 odds i wasnt going to bet a dime on jacobs...
Comment
-
Me before the fight:
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostNo. Actually what you guys are doing is to downplay Jacobs chances, so if he makes a competitive fight or beats GGG, you will say GGG was a bum all along.
I'm being unbiased. It's the #1 MW against the #2 MW. I expect a close fight. If you don't expect a close fight, then I guess you are more of a GGG tard than me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postof course 1% is an exageration... i myself said before the fight that "if jacobs could make it past 6 then the fight could get really interesting" but that was a big if
to me...
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI voted him a B+ in the poll and I think I picked him to win by UD. (even though I think GGG will win).
Comment
Comment