CNN sues White House for revoking Jim Acosta's press pass.

[[ DUBBZZ ]]

Nothing to do with precedence. Fox is doing this for the ratings.

The President has the right to block any journalist from the White House. He can choose whoever he wants to be interviewed by. It's not like he removed Acosta's right to be a journalist and publish his opinions. He simply can't go into the White House.

Nah. Fox doesn't wanna side with CNN but they know they have to on this one.

If a Dem takes office in the future and decides he doesn't like a a specific Fox reporter and bans him from the WH, they'd know they can't do shit about it because Trump did the same thing.

[Vlad_]

Nah. Fox doesn't wanna side with CNN but they know they have to on this one.

If a Dem takes office in the future and decides he doesn't like a a specific Fox reporter and bans him from the WH, they'd know they can't do shit about it because Trump did the same thing.

If that journalist behaves the way Acosto does, with complete disrespect for other journalists and complete disrespect for the President, he deserves to be banned permanantly from the WH.

You did see how Acosta behaved himself ever since Trump was president, didn’t you?

Acosta will simply have to do his reporting from acosta street.

[[ DUBBZZ ]]

If that journalist behaves the way Acosto does, with complete disrespect for other journalists and complete disrespect for the President, he deserves to be banned permanantly from the WH.

You did see how Acosta behaved himself ever since Trump was president, didn’t you?

Acosta will simply have to do his reporting from acosta street.

I ain't even talking about Acosta's behavior or why he was banned. I don't really care.

I was addressing Reed's post as to why Fox would wanna side with CNN.

The reason ain't political, it's business. Both companies basically do the same thing, just on opposing sides. Just like in any business, Fox knows what affects their competitor most likely can and will affect them.

[COVID-19]

The orange man doesn’t like the hard questions!

[Vlad_]

The orange man doesn’t like the hard questions!

Nah, he just doesn’t like a soyboys screaming and begging for attention constantly.

[1bad65]

I believe a judge is to rule on this this afternoon.

[1bad65]

Nah, he just doesn’t like a soyboys screaming and begging for attention constantly.

When you see the term "orange man" it's a safe bet you're dealing with a programmed NPC.

Best to ignore them, as they dont bring free-thinking to the table.

[Lomasexual]

Of course he didn't.

When sports channels show replays, they often slow down or accelerate clips, and that's probably also "doctored" in his little doctored brain of his.

Address the point, huh?

Ok - you mean saying it is pathetic to play stupid semantic games with the word 'doctored' and 'edited' and 'altered' when the fact is that the video was changed to make it look like something happened differently from how it actually happened?

It seems like your stupid semantic game was the failure to address the point.

How is it okay for the Trump administration to be throwing out video that has been altered to make it look like something happened differently from how it happened?

The thing is, if Trump was caught with his tiny pecker stuck in a baby - you would be laughing at people who call him a pedophile, because the actual term should be pedarast... a stupid semantic game to deflect from the real point - and then you would accuse them of not addressing the point...

Go read up on partisan psychology, then think long and hard about whether you want to keep waving those pompoms around.

[1bad65]

The judge delayed his decision until Friday morning.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/emergency-...211503820.html

[Vlad_]

Address the point, huh?

Ok - you mean saying it is pathetic to play stupid semantic games with the word 'doctored' and 'edited' and 'altered' when the fact is that the video was changed to make it look like something happened differently from how it actually happened?

It seems like your stupid semantic game was the failure to address the point.

How is it okay for the Trump administration to be throwing out video that has been altered to make it look like something happened differently from how it happened?

The thing is, if Trump was caught with his tiny pecker stuck in a baby - you would be laughing at people who call him a pedophile, because the actual term should be pedarast... a stupid semantic game to deflect from the real point - and then you would accuse them of not addressing the point...

Go read up on partisan psychology, then think long and hard about whether you want to keep waving those pompoms around.

Mm hmmm.... a long list of BS points.

When sports channels show a replay of a goal in slow motion, is it doctored? It’s edited to show something.

There was no doctoring of the video. It showed exactly what happened, with an emphasis on exactly what had happened.

What exactly did the video show that was false? You listen to the media like a sheep and then repeat their false narrative. Did you even watch the “doctored” video?