Originally posted by Eff Pandas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Recent examples of 1st world military coups or coups stopped by the armed populace.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JimRaynor View PostIt's not that we are brainwashed is that you don't live in reality, you're equating the USA government to some third world dictatorship.
A bunch of duck hunting mfers aren't stopping a trained military with weapons that put the average citizens weaponry to shame & probably got them out ammunitioned 100 to 1 if I'm being optimistic for the citizen "army". I'd bet the first day more citizens kill other citizens then they'd kill the opposing military force.
The media goes hysterical when armed gangsters get killed by cops, what the hell do you think would happen if the government decided to slaughter people by the masses?
Comment
-
Quick numbers to crunch.
There are roughly 265M privately owned guns in U.S.
Roughly 100M Americans own a gun.
There are roughly 1.4M people in the U.S. Armed Forces (not sure if that number includes cooks, truck drivers, and file clerks)
The military has to kill us at a roughly 100:1 ratio to win
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostAnyone trying to argue that US civilians could stop the full full force of US military is flat out ******ed. Which is a good enough reason to take their guns.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View PostQuick numbers to crunch.
There are roughly 265M privately owned guns in U.S.
Roughly 100M Americans own a gun.
There are roughly 1.4M people in the U.S. Armed Forces (not sure if that number includes cooks, truck drivers, and file clerks)
The military has to kill us at a roughly 100:1 ratio to win
Comment
-
Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View PostQuick numbers to crunch.
There are roughly 265M privately owned guns in U.S.
Roughly 100M Americans own a gun.
There are roughly 1.4M people in the U.S. Armed Forces (not sure if that number includes cooks, truck drivers, and file clerks)
The military has to kill us at a roughly 100:1 ratio to win
I bet a good % of gun owners would be too p#ssy to kill a mfer when it came down to it or be pissing themselves in a armed gun battle. Or when sh^t is exploding around them. There is a reason there is boot camp & training happening before they throw your a$$ into a real fight. Lotsa mfers can't handle that sh^t. Lotsa mfers would lose it.
I definitely foresee day 1 of this fictional battle to involve more citizen gun owners killing other citizen gun owners then the opposing force.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostThe question is the question. It doesn't even matter what you think reality is or what I think reality is.
A bunch of duck hunting mfers aren't stopping a trained military with weapons that put the average citizens weaponry to shame & probably got them out ammunitioned 100 to 1 if I'm being optimistic for the citizen "army". I'd bet the first day more citizens kill other citizens then they'd kill the opposing military force.
In 1991 the oppressive Soviet regime fell apart when people took to the streets with no weapons.
If you think the USA government would just steam roll through their people you have tunnel vision. Americans in general are well armed, certain states have their own ideologies. Meaning if a governmental revolt did happen against a place like Texas, in all likelihood it wouldn't just be Texas, states like Oklahoma, Arizona, and others would join them as well.
Again this ain't got nothing to do with nothing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lomadeaux View PostThe problem with fighting off tyranny is NOT defeating the military or anybody else. It's slapping the **** out of dumb asses who have been kneeling at the flag informing them that **** is real now. They're the ones who would surrender and give in first.
Comment
-
Comment