Tweet
Originally posted by Sup
View Post
-
Nah it's cool man. 1/4 the people on here are never trumpers who personally hate Donald Trump and thus will vote for Crooked H or Mr. Aleppo (A lot of Latinos with napoleon complex on here). 1/2 are beta liberal democrats who eat up everything Trevor Noah blathers. And the other 1/4 are on board the Trump Train ready to lay waste to those who stand in our path. It's really sad though and just shows how much of our society is sucked into what the mainstream media is pushing. The historical significance of this election is being completely glossed over. -
I should have figured that. Some threads need to be left alone--they invite better dialogue.Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
This is a rare opportunity. I honestly didn't know if I would witness it in my lifetime--but here it is. A movement by the people, spearheaded by a man who at first many laughed at (what a joke), who was then dismissed (no need to worry about him), who was then attacked (he is gaining momentum), and who has risen to now have the liberals, the establishment, and the globalist scared (the people are awake and they are pissed)-- It's a beautiful thing.Originally posted by creekrat77 View Post
I don't agree with all of these threads being added to one "master" thread. Some should be added if repetitive, but others are better left alone as the dialogue would be much better/concise. I really hope that there is no censorship taking place on this site.Originally posted by creekrat77 View PostComment
-
Looks like whatever the perception of 1st debate was...today's polls indicate that Trump continues to gain support. I think it will be harder for CNN's Anderson Cooper and ABC's Martha Raddatz not to press Hillary harder during the 2nd debate given Holt's criticism for stacking the deck and that Trump can only look better and should be more prepared.
The 3rd debate moderated by Fox News’s Chris Wallace should be a walk in the park for Trump and the last debate is the lasting impression. All Hillary really brought to the 1st debate was dirt...and without actually bringing up Bill's past woman adventures during the debate...he still managed to get the media to talk about it anyways a la Trump style.
Latest Polls
Thursday, September 29
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Rasmussen Reports Clinton 42, Trump 41, Johnson 7, Stein 2
Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
LA Times/USC Tracking Clinton 43, Trump 47
Trump +4
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/Last edited by jaded; 09-29-2016, 08:49 PM.Comment
-
USA's 5th largest Newspaper calls it a cover-up...mainstream media's 1st real accusation against Clinton and the FBI.
It can only be ignored for so long by the mainstream media. Once this gather's just a wee bit of momentum...it will be nothing but down-hill for Hillary regardless of fat women in America and around the world. Let the real Miss Piggy stand up.
The FBI’s Hillary email probe is looking even more like a coverup
By Paul Sperry
http://nypost.com/2016/09/28/the-fbi...ike-a-coverup/
September 28, 2016 | 7:33pm
Modal Trigger
It’s bad enough that FBI Director James Comey agreed to pass out immunity deals like candy to material witnesses and potential targets of his investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s illegal private email server.
But now we learn that some of them were immunized despite lying to Comey’s investigators.
In the latest bombshell from Congress’ probe into what’s looking more and more like an FBI whitewash (or coverup) of criminal behavior by the Democratic nominee and her aides, the Denver-based tech who destroyed subpoenaed emails from Clinton’s server allegedly lied to FBI agents after he got an immunity deal.
That’s normally a felony. As a federal prosecutor, Comey tossed Martha Stewart in jail for it and helped convict Scooter Libby for it as well. Yet the key Clinton witness still maintained his protection from criminal prosecution.
With Comey’s blessing, Obama prosecutors cut the deal with the email administrator, Paul Combetta, in 2015 in exchange for his full cooperation and honest testimony. But the House Judiciary Committee revealed Wednesday that he falsely told agents in a Feb. 18 interview that he had no knowledge that emails he bleached from the server were under congressional orders to be preserved as evidence.
In a second interview on May 3, Combetta admitted he in fact did know. But he still refused to reveal what he discussed with Clinton’s former aides and lawyer during a 2014 conference call about deleting the emails.
Instead of asking Attorney General Loretta Lynch to revoke his immunity deal and squeezing him, Comey let him go because he was a “low-level guy,” he testified at the House hearing. It’s yet another action by Comey that has left former prosecutors shaking their heads.
“When I was at the Department of Justice, your reward for lying to a federal agent was a potential obstruction of justice charge,” House Judiciary Committee member Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) said. “It wasn’t immunity.”
Ratcliffe argued Combetta violated the terms of his immunity agreement and therefore “shouldn’t have immunity anymore.”
Another panel member, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), established that former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills also lied when she told agents she had no idea Clinton maintained a private email server. She once sent the server administrator a message asking “is server ok” after emails she sent Clinton kept bouncing back. Yet Mills continued to get immunity as well.
Comey said he looked “very hard” but couldn’t make an obstruction case “against any of the subjects we looked at.” He claimed not to have the evidence.
But the case suffered from the fact that he was denied evidence by Clinton and her minions, including:
A personal Apple email server used by Clinton in her first two months in office.
An Apple MacBook and thumb drive that contained her email archives, which was “lost” in the mail.
Two BlackBerry devices that were missing SIM cards and SD data cards.
13 mobile devices either lost or smashed with hammers.
Two iPads.
Server backup files that were deleted.
Copies of emails located on the laptops of Mills and another aide who got immunity that were wiped clean with software called BleachBit after the Benghazi committee sought the documents.
Clinton’s server email archive, which was deleted using BleachBit by Combetta after the emails were subpoenaed.
Backups of the server email files, which were manually deleted.
This mass destruction of evidence was known to Comey. It’s in his investigative case summary. Yet he couldn’t make an obstruction case?
“Any one of those in that long list says obstruction of justice,” Ratcliffe said. “Collectively, they scream obstruction of justice.”
Ignoring such evidence leads “not just reasonable prosecutors but reasonable people to believe that maybe the decision on this was made a long time ago not to prosecute Hillary Clinton,” he added.
In other words, the fix was in.
Either that, or Comey led one of the shoddiest probes in FBI history. God help us if that’s the way he’s investigating the 1,000-plus ISIS terrorist cases now open in all 50 states.Comment
-
Trump Camp Has Shatters Fundraising Records Less Than 24 hrs After Debate
Trump Camp Has Shatters Fundraising Records Less Than 24 hrs After Debate
http://conservativetribune.com/trump...tters-records/
Americans must believe in Donald Trump, because just after the first presidential debate, Trump raised millions of dollars for his campaign.
According to The Hill, Trump’s campaign raised $18 million in less than 24 hours after that debate.Comment
-
Originally posted by jaded View Post
did you see what happened to gary johnson when he was interviewed by chris matthews????
MSNBC and CNN on the attack....
siphoning too much votes off hillary.
I mean its his fault too for his blatant ignorance on the question but the mainstream media's disgusting one sided action against trump this election cycle is one of the main reasons why im voting trump.
that and his stance on muslim immigration and open borders.Comment
-
take the debate for example,
lester holt and the debate org told the crowd not to cheer answers,
the crowd cheers once for trump,
gets admonished by holt,
then the crowd cheers 3x for hillary AFTER the crowd cheered for trump AND NOT A SINGLE PEEP from Holt.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
NBC's Lester Holt managed to question Trump about his taxes and allowed Hillary to go on with unfounded allegations of fat shaming as if it was an indictable offence...but somehow forgot about this...
IRS Will Look Into Congressional Concerns Involving Clinton Foundation
Kelly Phillips Erb ,
Forbes Staff
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphi.../#49bb43edf126
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will look into allegations of impropriety at the Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. In a July 22 letter to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), first posted by The Daily Caller, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen wrote that the tax agency had “forwarded the information you submitted” to the Exempt Organizations program in Dallas.
The Commissioner went on to say that “this program considers all referrals and will send you a separate acknowledgment letter when it receives your information.” Due to privacy concerns under Section 6103 of the Tax Code, the Commissioner advised that “we cannot disclose any actions we may take on this information.”
If that language smacks a little bit of a standard response, it likely is. In the wake of increased scrutiny over its handling of the tax exempt organization scandal, I suspect the IRS will proceed carefully.
The letter was in response to a July 15 letter addressed to the IRS, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from dozens of Representatives, including Rep. Blackburn, calling for an investigation into the Foundation’s activities.
Specifically, the letter stated that after having previously expressed concerns to the IRS in May 2015 and the FTC last April, “unresolved media reports raising significant issues of public corruptions regarding Foundation activities, American foreign policy, and Secretary Clinton compel us to write again.” The letter says that those reports “along with recently discovered information about the Foundation’s initial tax exempt filings, portray a lawless ‘Pay to Play’ enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.”
The letter goes on to allege, as a first concern, that the Foundation’s initial application prohibits the current activity. Specifically, the letter charges that the Foundation’s global initiatives “appear to be unlawful pursuant to IRS guidance.”
The letter also singles out donations from the chairman of Uranium One, a Russian run company, which has “control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.” Those donations, the letter charges, were not reported by the Foundation and smacks of a “Pay to Play” pattern that “personally enriched the Clinton’s at the expense of American foreign policy.”
The letter goes on to ask that “each of your agencies review these allegations pursuant to your jurisdictional charge.”
Neither of the FBI or FTC has directly responded to the July 15 letter. However, the FTC did respond to an earlier inquiry by Rep. Blackburn (you can read the response here). And FBI Director James Comey previously advised during testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that he was “not going to comment on the existence or nonexistence of other investigations,” in response to inquiries about the Clinton Foundation.
Citing privacy laws, the IRS typically does not comment on specific taxpayer investigations, and that’s the case here. I reached out to the IRS for additional comment, and they issued the following statement:
The IRS receives referrals from a variety of sources. We forward all referrals to the appropriate area for consideration of whether there are issues that justify further review. We have standard processes and procedures we follow when we receive information or referrals from outside groups. Due to federal privacy protections, the IRS cannot comment on individual taxpayers or organizations.
The letter also alleges that services performed by former President Bill Clinton as honorary chancellor of Laureate International University, for which he received compensation, may be perceived as a conflict of interest since, the letter claims, Laureate is also a donor to the Foundation. The letter goes on to state that International Youth Foundation (IYF), a charity run by Laureate International University founder David Becker, received $55 million of USAID grants from 2010 to 2012. Since USAID operates under “substantial guidance from the Secretary of State,” the interconnection of those charities, the letter charges “creates an appearance that millions of dollars in taxpayer money was channeled to IYF… as a kickback for her husband’s generous contract as an honorary Laureate chancellor.”
A spokesperson from Laureate said, about the letter, “Allegations of any quid pro quo between Laureate, the International Youth Foundation and the Clintons are completely false. IYF and Laureate Education are independent organizations. Laureate has never received any funds from IYF. Both Politifact and the Washington Post’s Fact Checker column have documented the many errors and misstatements about Laureate, the IYF and federal funding.”
I did reach out to the Foundation, but they did not issue a public comment in response to my query.Comment
Comment