Brazilian Man...Gets Gang Raped By 20 Prisoners

[SkillspayBills]

Dude, how do you get raped, they stich your anus, and then they RAPE YOU AGAIN RIPPING YOUR **** STITCHING. Shheeeeesssshhh they hated this guy.

[BrotherDudeJack]

Breaking News: It wasn't 20 inmates, just Bernard Hopkins aka "Ol Soapy" with a bottle of Viagra.

[squealpiggy]

It's not about that at all. Criminals despise child molesters because firstly a great number of those who turn to a life of crime were harmed as children themselves, for many it's a way of revenge. It's also because those who harm children are harming the weakest, most defenceless people and are committing a sick crime which is not even in the same stratosphere as murder, robbery, drugs etc criminals don't want to be near child molesters, they want nothing to do with them. It's not using them as a whipping boy to make themselves feel better, it's for the atrocity of their crimes.

No it isn't. Most people in high security prisons got there by preying on people weaker then themselves, and this is just a continuation of that behaviour.

[New England]

No it isn't. Most people in high security prisons got there by preying on people weaker then themselves, and this is just a continuation of that behaviour.

no it isn't. that's an extremely limited understanding of what's going on. i don't know how much you've read about prison, but it sounds like little to nothing.

i don't expect you to change your opinion, but here's an abstract from a paper that outlines the functions of rape and violence against child molesters.

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.152...1103727409151d

[BennyST]

The one year old got his revenge on this sick fuk.

No, he really didn't at all. He's dead. The one chance at life he got is gone now, taken from him by this sick ****, and nothing can fix it or get it back. No matter how many times this guy gets raped, beaten or whatever, it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever to a kid that's now dead.

[MrTambourineMan]

No, he really didn't at all. He's dead. The one chance at life he got is gone now, taken from him by this sick ****, and nothing can fix it or get it back. No matter how many times this guy gets raped, beaten or whatever, it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever to a kid that's now dead.

Absolutely spot on, Benny. The idea that Rape is in any way redeeming for that poor Child is absolutely appalling thinking.

"Yeah, lets get our rocks off by Sodomising - This one's for you, Kid!"

[Weltschmerz]

Too bad he did not die. Child molestation is the worst thing in the world.

[Weltschmerz]

No it isn't. Most people in high security prisons got there by preying on people weaker then themselves, and this is just a continuation of that behaviour.

I found this thread, skipped to the last page, and I just knew you would be here saying the he didnt deserve this.

Let me be clear. He did.

[squealpiggy]

I found this thread, skipped to the last page, and I just knew you would be here saying the he didnt deserve this.

Let me be clear. He did.

Oh, well if you're clear.

Let me be clear: At no point have I made any statement on what he may or may not have "deserved". In the civilised world we punish crimes by restricting the freedom of the perpetrators. We do not use judicial torture. We do not use retributive rape.

Advocating the use of torture, rape and murder to punish crimes is barbaric and says more about you than about the criminals.

no it isn't. that's an extremely limited understanding of what's going on. i don't know how much you've read about prison, but it sounds like little to nothing.

i don't expect you to change your opinion, but here's an abstract from a paper that outlines the functions of rape and violence against child molesters.

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.152...1103727409151d

As you know I'm always in favour of an explanation that begins with "It's more complicated than that". From your link it seems that the paper argues that one function of abuse of child molesters in prison is to prevent future child molestation, but argues that another is to raise the prisoner's social status by differentiating them from child molesters.

Prison hierarchy is complicated but is predicated upon violence and usefulness. The people who are unable to acquit themselves using violence and have no useful abilities to offer can only gain status using a tortured metric of morality (which is a great name for a band) by which the reason for their own incarceration is measured against that of others. In other words people convicted of "dirty" crimes like rape, abuse of children, crimes against the elderly are shunned, denied the opportunity for protection and may be attacked with impunity.

The irony is that in some cultures (the US, and now apparently Brazil) perpetrators of dirty crimes like rape can be punished without a hint of irony by inmates engaging in rape. In British prisons rapists of other inmates are very quickly labeled "nonces" and treated accordingly.

[Weltschmerz]

Oh, well if you're clear.

Let me be clear: At no point have I made any statement on what he may or may not have "deserved". In the civilised world we punish crimes by restricting the freedom of the perpetrators. We do not use judicial torture. We do not use retributive rape.

Advocating the use of torture, rape and murder to punish crimes is barbaric and says more about you than about the criminals.

His crime was not civilized, so he does not deserve to be treated in a civilized way. Death penalty is used in the 'civilized' world, and this should be his punishment. Getting the treatment he did was just a consequence of his own actions, Brazilian prison rules don't engage in civilized behavior as you are undoubtedly aware by now. Yes, those people are animals, but **** happens if you end up like this guy did. Dire consequences.

That you are trying to defend this scumbag says a lot about yourself. I didn't advocate this happening, I said he deserved it, which he did. Personally, I would just have given him a lethal injection, which would be very civilized and painless.